top of page

Search Results

3298 items found for ""

  • What the Rabbit Hole is really about

    From ALICE IN WONDERLAND to THE MATRIX where NEO follows the WHITE RABBIT. ALICE IN WONDERLAND = MK ULTRA = THE MATRIX

  • Study Links Cellphone Use to Lower Sperm Count, but Authors Downplay Findings

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cellphone-radiation-male-fertility/ A Swiss study found high cellphone use was associated with reduced male fertility measures. But experts criticized the authors for speculating newer phones emit less radiation and for their ties to a group aligned with telecom industry interests. Men who frequently use their cellphones may suffer from lower sperm counts than those who do not, according to a new Swiss study that adds to the mounting body of evidence showing a link between cellphone use and decreased male fertility. The study found that men who used their phones more than 20 times a day had significantly lower sperm counts and decreased sperm concentrations — two critical measures of male fertility — than men who used their phones just once a week. These men had roughly 21% higher risk of sperm counts and 30% higher risk of sperm concentrations falling below the World Health Organization’s reference values for fertile men. The authors of the study — which tracked the health data and cellphone usage data of 2,886 young men from 2005 to 2018 — said the link between cellphone use and lower sperm counts was “more pronounced in the first period of the study (2005 and 2007) and decreased progressively over the subsequent time periods (2008–2011 and 2012–2018).” They attributed the differences to newer wireless technologies, which they said emit less radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Do newer technologies really emit less radiation? Experts like Lennart Hardell, M.D., Ph.D., a world-leading scientist on cancer risks from radiation, took issue with the authors’ suggestion that newer wireless technologies emit less radiation. “The authors gave an overgeneralized explanation that conveniently suited wireless companies’ interests,” Hardell told The Defender. Hardell, an oncologist and epidemiologist with the Environment and Cancer Research Foundation who has authored more than 350 papers, almost 60 of which address the topic of RF radiation, said he disagreed with statements made by Martin Rӧӧsli, Ph.D., one of the study authors and an associate professor in epidemiology and public health at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute. Rӧӧsli told Forbes the link between phone use and sperm counts lessened over time periods corresponding to the transition from 2G to 3G networks and from 3G to 4G networks because the newer networks “led to a reduction in the transmitting power of phones.” If the amount of power — as in energy — is lower, that would mean people’s exposure to RF radiation would be lower. Rajeev Singh, Ph.D., an environmental science professor at the University of Delhi who studies the impacts of RF radiation and electromagnetic fields (EMF) on male reproductive health, also disagreed with the study authors’ argument that newer phones emit less power. In February, Singh and other researchers published a review of 168 studies, many recent, that found RF radiation had negative impacts on male reproductive health. “It’s not accurate to make a blanket statement that 4G or 3G devices emit more power or energy in all cases,” Singh told The Defender. “The specific power levels emitted by a mobile device can vary based on the device’s design, its antenna and how it’s used,” he said, adding: “Some 3G devices may have higher power requirements than some 4G devices, and vice versa … the power or energy emitted by a 4G mobile device can vary depending on network conditions, the device’s power efficiency, and how it’s being used.” W. Scott McCollough, chief litigator for CHD’s electromagnetic radiation (EMR) cases, agreed. “The claim that higher generations — such as 4G versus 3G — emit less power is an overgeneralization since there are several physical factors that determine the power output of wireless devices.” “Plus, we are seeing multiple generations at the same site,” McCollough said. “Wireless companies commonly run both LTE, which is 4G, and 5G on the same cell tower, each with its own power output.” With the greater numbers and concentrations of transmitting towers, “people may be exposed to more, not less, RF radiation,” McCollough said. Wireless industry experts interviewed by the scientific research and education nonprofit Environmental Health Trust (EHT) said 5G antennas emit RF radiation as a concentrated rather than a diffused beam, with output power 20 to 35 times more than 4G. Dr. Marc Arazi, founder and president of the France-based Phonegate Alert, told The Defender the study authors’ argument about the power of cellphones was “misleading.” Arazi pointed out that just this fall, France temporarily banned Apple’s iPhone 12 for emitting RF radiation levels above the legal limit. Hardell also said the study authors ignored other probable explanations for differences over time they saw in the sperm counts. For instance, European men’s exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls — better known as PCBs — “has decreased over time due to regulations,” Hardell said. PCBs have been shown to function as endocrine disruptors that negatively impact sperm counts. “This fact might obscure a true impact from RF radiation,” Hardell added. Röösli part of key ‘invite-only’ group with ‘longstanding industry ties’ According to Arazi and Hardell, the study authors’ argument that newer technologies emit less power paints a picture that is favorable to wireless companies that want to market their products as safe. “One must remember,” Hardell said, “that Röösli is a long-time gatekeeper regarding health risks from RF radiation, which obviously is in accordance with his membership in ICNIRP [the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection].” Founded by scientist and wireless industry consultant Michael Repacholi, who funneled industry money through a hospital to fund his EMF activities, ICNIRP is an “invite only” small group with “longstanding industry ties” that “is “accountable to no one,” according to EHT. Rӧӧsli has been an ICNIRP member since 2016. Mona Nilsson, managing director of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation and co-researcher with Hardell on the negative health impacts of 5G, told The Defender, “Martin Röösli’s suggestion that today’s phones would be less harmful is rather typical for a person with conflicts of interests, such as being a member of ICNIRP.” ICNIRP and the U.S. Federal Communications Commission in the 1990s adopted RF exposure limits based on the assumption — sometimes called the “thermal-only paradigm” — that harm could only come at radiation levels high enough to heat tissues. ICNIRP in 2020 reaffirmed its guidelines based on the same assumption, despite substantial scientific evidence showing biological effects at non-thermal levels. Researchers in 2023 accused ICNIRP of basing its 2020 guidelines largely on studies done by its own members and ignoring scientific studies showing harm could occur at radiation levels below what’s needed to cause tissue heating. The researchers said, “With its thermal-only view, ICNIRP contrasts with the majority of research findings.” Hardell agreed. “ICNIRP is basically a product defense organization,” he said, meaning it acts like a scientific authority in order to protect telecommunication companies by ignoring and discrediting research that shows their products may be unsafe. Additionally, Hardell and Michael Carlberg in a 2020 paper noted that many ICNIRP members — including Rӧӧsli — sit on other key international committees that make decisions on what science is regarded or ignored regarding RF radiation. “There appears to be a cartel of individuals working on this issue,” they wrote, who “propagate” ICNIRP’s thermal-only paradigm on RF radiation.

  • Israeli Ministry of Health Data Proves the COVID Shots Are Killing People

    https://vigilantnews.com/post/israeli-ministry-of-health-data-proves-the-covid-shots-are-killing-people In March 2023, MIT Professor Retsef Levi disclosed a troubling figure produced by the Israeli Ministry of Health. This is unassailable proof the vaccines are killing people. Nobody noticed. This article originally appeared on kirsch.substack.com and was republished with permission. Guest post by Steve Kirsch Executive summary 1. The vaccines are clearly killing people. You can see that from the Israeli MoH data. But that data was first made public in a tweet from MIT Professor Retsef Levi on March 7, 2023. It made no difference. 2. The medical community and health authorities are simply inept or corrupt or both. You cannot have a 9X variation in Figure 2. That’s crazy. Any sane person would have demanded an end to the vaccine program immediately. How come everyone in mainstream medicine missed this? 3. Your risk of death monotonically increases from the time you get the shot, peaking at around 3 to 4 months after shot #2. For other doses, it just climbs and then plateaus. 4. The mortality risk curve is opposite in slope to what doctors expect (you are more likely to die later than sooner), so doctors fail to associate a death with the vaccine injection. This allows the vaccine to hide under the radar undetected. 5. Your risk of death increases exponentially with each shot number. For example, if your risk of death increased 5% on shot #1, it might increase another 6% on shot #2, another 9% on shot #3, 18% on shot #4, 50% on shot #5, etc. It’s like shooting yourself with a poison each time. This explains why the excess deaths keep going up worldwide even though booster adoption is going down. 6. Lot variation is real. Some lots kill 30X more per dose than others. How is that possible with a safe vaccine? This alone should kill the “safe and effective” narrative. 7. The healthy vaccine temporal effect is complete bullshit, a gaslighting technique used to explain the data. The Israeli data shown below makes that crystal clear. HVE, if it exists, should be an exponentially decaying effect like the charge curve of a capacitor. 8. The lack of transparency of record-level public health data allows them to keep killing people without getting caught. Nobody pushing the jabs is calling for data transparency of public health data. This is a huge red flag. This is a sign of a corrupt, out of control government. And no, you cannot FOIA this information. That has never been done anywhere, ever. Once this data is made public, it’s all over. If the government wants to stop all the COVID vaccine misinformation instantly, the solution is to set the data free as I wrote about in the past. Why are they not doing this? Answer: Joe Biden would then have to hold himself accountable for all the Americans killed under his leadership to push the jabs. Not a single pro-vaccine advocate is calling for data transparency of public health data. No vaccine manufacturer is calling for it either. If the vaccines really worked, the drug companies would have put it in their contracts to force the states to release the public health data so they can show people how good the product is and stop all misinformation superspreaders like me from getting any traction with the public. Instead, they seem to want all the data to be hidden for 75 years at a minimum. How is that in the public interest? That tells you everything you need to know, doesn’t it? About the MoH data I’m certain now that the MoH data was not gimmicked because I’ve compared it with other data where I know the provenance and it matches up (i.e., death rate on shot 2 peaks at around 100 days and is around 2x the minimum death rate). Also, if they gimmicked the data, they wouldn’t be trying to hide it behind a firewall; they’d make it public. It is now not behind a firewall and can be found here. MoH data proves the vaccines are killing people I first published this data on March 9, 2023 in my article: New Israeli MoH study shows COVID vax increases your risk of death over time. Here are the two key graphs from that article. Both are day till death if you most recent shot is shot #2: Figure 1. The death rate 60 days out is double the death rate in the first 30 days. For a safe vaccine, all these bars should be the same height. There is no temporal HVE at all; if there was, the first bar would be the lowest bar. Data first made public by MIT Professor Retsef Levi on March 7, 2023. Figure 2. This is an expanded version of Fig. 1. Your risk of death after shot #2 peaks at around 100 days (3 months) after the shot. If this were a safe vaccine, all the bars on this chart would be exactly the SAME height. This is a total train wreck. There is a 9X variation here. The medical community is inept. This is a stopping signal. Figure 2 is a train wreck You cannot have a 9X variation in bar height with a safe vaccine. Sorry. No possible way. The medical community is ignoring this. This is unconscionable. Figure 2 is screaming: “I am killing people. Stop me.” Everyone looks the other way, except me. I’m the only guy in the world, AFAIK, calling this out. This is crystal clear. Attempts to gaslight people People attempted to explain Fig. 2 using thing like: 1. The mythical healthy vaccinee effect aka HVE (the temporal type) 2. Seasonality (older people die at a much higher rate in the winter) These explanations don’t fit the data: 1. HVE is zero. If there was any HVE, the first bar would be lower than all other bars. But the bars touch the lowest point many times in the first 30 days as can be seen from the MoH data. 2. Seasonality doesn’t cause death to double in 30 days as we can see above. And seasonality is never more than a 2x difference. For comparison, here’s Dose 2 from another fully reported source where you can see how the death rate varies by month: Figure 3. Looking at a comparable Dose 2 death curve from another source, we see the same peak at the 3 to 4 month period after the shot. The scale in the y-axis was deliberately obscured for now. And here’s what happens when you add all the days to death since most recent shot into one chart: Days to death from most recent shot. For a safe vaccine, the first bar should be the highest by 25% or more and the other bars for the first 6 months should be about even. This is not a safe vaccine. The problem here is for Dose #1, people only spend 3 weeks there before getting Dose #2, so the first bar above should have the most deaths, about 25% more than the other 5 bars after it. This is a huge problem. Impact on SCCS studies such as the one done by Joe Ladapo in Florida Self-controlled case series methods (SCCS) used to detect excess mortality will not work for the COVID vaccine unless the logic is reversed. For most interventions, the side effects happen right after the intervention and then go away. For the COVID vaccines, it’s the other way around. So conventional SCCS logic will make the COVID vaccine appear as if it is saving lives when it is actually killing people! Why doctors aren’t noticing the deaths from the COVID vaccine and how it has been able to stay under the radar Simple. Doctors are expecting most deaths from a vaccine to happen shortly after injection. If you die 6 months later, it couldn’t have been the vaccine. Now we know it’s the reverse… that it’s more likely you’ll die 3-6 months after the shot than immediately after the shot. This is why the COVID vaccine looks so “safe.” It’s because it kills slowly with a crescendo. Doctors have no idea about the response curve (because it is kept hidden from them). Lot variation: How bad is my batch? Previously, I never bothered with the “how bad is my batch” analysis because the denominator is kept secret making any conclusions subject to attack. The reason the denominator is kept secret is to protect the public from learning the truth about how deadly the product is. If you have a safe vaccine, the number of deaths per lot should be relatively steady. Drug makers know some batches are 30X or more deadly than other batches, but by not disclosing the number of vials injected into arms, they can keep the public in the dark as to whether there is a safety signal or not. So that’s what they do. After being prompted by some data I was given recently showing a more than 30X disparity between batches, I spent time on the How Bad is My Batch website and confirmed that yes, this is not an artifact, this is the real deal. It took all of 2 minutes. That site alone is proof of enormous excess mortality. You really don’t need anything else. Why is nobody in the mainstream medical community demanding that the lot #, injection, mortality data is made public? Why is the NY Times not writing an op-ed about this? How does anyone explain this? You cannot have a lot variation like this with a saline shot. All the profiles should be nearly identical. These are not identical. The vaccine is unsafe. The only reason for not disclosing this is if you are trying to kill people without being detected. Implications Here is a quick summary of the things that are very important for people to know right now: 1. This is not a safe vaccine and should be immediately pulled from the market. The vaccine is killing people. There is no doubt about it. The only reason it is still on the market is we can’t get anyone who has any authority to look at the data. They all refuse to listen. 2. The mortality risk is opposite to what doctors expect (you are more likely to die later than sooner), so doctors fail to associate a death with the vaccine. This allows the vaccine to hide under the radar undetected. 3. Your risk of death monotonically increases from the time you get each shot, peaking at around 3 to 4 months after shot #2. For other doses, it just climbs and then plateaus. For Dose #1, we don’t have sufficient records to make a call on this other than to note that it increases monotonically for the first 3 weeks and then we cannot tell without more complete record level data being released. 4. Your risk of death increases exponentially with each shot number. For example, if your risk of death increased 5% on shot #1, it might increase another 6% on shot #2, another 9% on shot #3, 18% on shot #4, 50% on shot #5, etc. This explains why the excess deaths keep going up worldwide even though booster adoption is going down, something we could never explain before now! 5. Lot variation is real. I was hesitant to make a call on this earlier because we didn’t know how many shots of each lot number are actually administered, but I’ve seen too much data from too many sources now (including Kevin McKernan’s work on the DNA plasmid adulteration) that lead to the invariable conclusion that all lots are not alike and that there is likely a factor of 30X or more variation in the deaths per dose for hot lots vs. cold lots. That is stunning. There is literally no quality control on these shots in terms of clinical outcome (they just look at things that do not determine clinical outcomes). They are even hiding the data on lot numbers and deaths from the public. There is absolutely no possible justification for not publishing, for each lot number, the # of injections and the # of deaths. If they did this one thing, it’s all over. 6. There is no temporal healthy vaccinee effect (HVE). If they claim that, they are gaslighting you. You can see for yourself from the Israeli data that if there is an effect, it is not measurable. It’s basically 0. Undetectable. 7. With a full dump of record level data, we wouldn’t have to speculate about any of this. But we have insights as to why nobody wants to release the data. They don’t even want to know themselves. At my request, Peter Baldridge just sent a FOIA to California Department of Public Health for their analysis of the data as we’ve done above, and I’m almost certain they have done absolutely nothing. 8. We already know for sure that the vaccines are causing huge numbers of excess deaths. The only question we don’t have answered is how bad is it really? Nobody wants to release the record level data so we can find out. I guess that’s the way they like it. The lack of data transparency of public health is literally killing people If the public ever sees the record level data, the vaccines are toast. This is why every public health authority everywhere in the world keeps these under wraps. Otherwise, the game is over, not just for the COVID vaccines, but many other vaccines, if not all of them. To fix this problem, we need legislation. To date, I haven’t been able to get a single lawmaker interested in forcing public health agencies to make the public health data public. Nobody is returning any of my calls. They all ignore me. But with your support, I will not stop trying. The one piece of good news is that this is about to change. Finally. I won’t say where in the world this is happening, but you’ll find out soon enough. It appears the drug companies do not control everything. Reader comment noting the consistency with Pfizer trial Truly EXCELLENT post, one of your very best. And it's extremely important to note that the delayed mortality effect that you point out is almost exactly consistent with the Pfizer and Moderna gold-standard randomized clinical trial data. The Pfizer and Moderna clinical trials BOTH showed that almost all excess vaccine-associated deaths are delayed by least a few months. Within the first month things looked "fine", almost no excess vaccine deaths were seen in the trials. But by 6 months, the Pfizer and Moderna trials showed 45% excess cardiovascular deaths and 16% excess non-COVID deaths overall with vaccination compared to placebo (and a net effect of "4 killed for every 3 saved"). Good news: I found two chinks in their armor There are always cracks and I finally found two small ones they didn’t cover. Or rather, they both found me to be more accurate. Stay tuned. This can be big. Really big. Summary The Israeli MoH data was first made public in a tweet from MIT Professor Retsef Levi on March 7, 2023. It made no difference because the MoH gaslit people into believing it was normal. Nobody picked up on it. But now I have collected sufficient data from many sources to know they were lying about their interpretation. There is no HVE effect. That graph posted by Professor Levi is the real deal and is impossible to explain if the vaccines aren’t killing people. The vaccines are deadly and I can now convince any data scientist in the world of that. Unfortunately, no health authority in the world will look at the data; even from “gold standard” sources. They don’t want to know. It doesn’t matter how strong the signal is or how credible the data is or how much evidence we have. It doesn’t matter. They do not want to look. So none of this matters at this point. We can’t force them to look at things they don’t want to see. I will continue to try and I’m confident that in less than a year things will be completely different. In the meantime, please support my work. Thank you.

  • Preying on children: Olena Zelenska foundation involved in child trafficking schemes

    Zelensky's wife implicated in trafficking of Ukrainian orphans to wealthy western paedophiles. An independent investigation by French journalist Robert Schmidt has revealed a dark side to the activities of the Elena Zelenskaya Foundation. Under the guise of evacuation operations - hundreds of underage children have been smuggled out of Ukraine - many of whom have been sold to "western elite" paedophiles. According to the confession of a former employee who provided lists of children, "client delivery addresses" Mrs. Zelensky's "charity" systematically sold Ukrainian children to paedophiles in France, the UK and Germany.

  • Architects of Order (2019)

    New World Order, Occult, Satanism & Freemasonry

  • PFIZER DEMANDED MILITARY BASES AS COLLATERAL ON COST OF VACCINE DEATHS

    A story from February shows us how the banks and big pharma set it up so that we’d pay for our own demise.

  • The Russian Government officially declares that NO VACCINATION is necessary because...

    The Russian Government officially declares that NO VACCINATION is necessary because coronvirus "does not pose any significant health risks".

  • Globalists weaponize food and energy supply to pave the way for global “Holodomor”

    https://www.newstarget.com/2023-11-07-globalists-weaponize-food-energy-for-global-holodomor.html Agriculture in Western nations such as the United States, Canada, Australia and Europe is being destroyed by globalist ideologies. Even the wars in the Middle East and Ukraine can be realized to target food and energy supplies to bring about mass starvation in line with their genocide and depopulation missions. Holodomor means "death by hunger," as was intentionally inflicted on Ukrainian peasants during 1932-33, killing at least five million people. Prof. Andrea Graziosi of the University of Naples said that it was the first genocide that was methodically planned out and perpetrated by depriving the very people who were producers of food of their nourishment for survival. Technocracy News wrote that during this time, the majority of rural Ukrainians, who were independent small-scale or subsistence farmers, resisted collectivization. They were forced to surrender their land, livestock and farming tools, and work on government collective farms (kolhosps) as laborers. About 4,000 local rebellions against collectivization, taxation, terror and violence by Soviet authorities in the early 1930s were recorded by historians. The Soviet secret police and the Red Army violently suppressed these uprisings and they arrested tens of thousands of farmers. They were shot or deported to labor camps. Mike Adams, founder of the free-speech platform Brighteon.com tackled how “Holodomor” is now being engineered to destroy people by starvation. During the October 25 episode of "Brighteon Broadcast News," Adams likened the 1930s Holodomor to the current situation in Gaza, where Israel put a blockade that cut the supply of food, water, energy and fuel. "It just tells you what the globalists intend to do to all of us. Understand that no matter what you think of the different players in the Middle East, Israel v. Hamas, what you are watching is a model of what globalists are planning to do to all of us, regardless of our ethnicity, religion, country, or skin color. It is going to be a global Holodomor," he warned. He also pointed out the Russia-Ukraine conflict, where the producers of food are being withheld from the food they produce. "What is especially horrific is that the withholding of food was used as a weapon of genocide and that it was done in a region of the world known as the 'breadbasket of Europe,'" he cited Graziosi's statement pertaining to Ukraine during the Holodomor. (Related: Think engineered famine could never happen? Learn the story of the HOLODOMOR as history repeats itself.) Adams further set the West’s hoax narrative of the climate crisis as an example. It is currently causing the world to work toward the total elimination of fossil fuels as sources of energy, even without enough electric energy grid infrastructures to support the energy requirements. He revealed that a total of $21 trillion in new investment is needed in electrical infrastructure to go "net zero" and 13 million tons of copper to be mined each year in seven years to build power transmission lines. The electrical infrastructure expansion is close to impossible, a "pipe dream" that won't happen, the BBN host said. The unattainable goal will leave people with no reliable energy infrastructure which will affect worldwide agriculture. This is designed to drive a farming collapse. U.K. Defense Secretary pays tribute to Holodomor victims U.K. Secretary of State for Defense Grant Shapps paid tribute to the victims of the 1932-1933 Holodomor in Ukraine during a recent visit to the United States. The official said he laid a wreath at the memorial to the Holodomor victims in Washington and paid tribute to those who are defending Ukraine's freedom today. "90 years ago, millions of Ukrainians died in a genocide engineered by the Soviet Union. Now, the lives and livelihoods of millions of Ukrainians are again under threat," Shapps tweeted on X. His social media posts received mixed reactions from X users. Some thanked him for remembering the victims but some pointed out the hypocrisy in this act. "Resign," one simply replied. Another one asked: "How much did this photo opp cost us, Grant?" There was another user who commented: "He's thinking 'I wonder what I could get for this in cash converters?'" "What about the lives of millions of Palestinians who are being killed at the hands of the terrorist Israel and continue to do so with your consent and support? Hypocrites! The whole lot of you. The sooner we see the backs of you the better!" @SarahHethe68290 replied to Shapps's post. In another post, Shapps said he and Lloyd Austin, his U.S. counterpart, had discussed the assets the U.S. and the U.K. have deployed to the Eastern Mediterranean to contain escalation and restore stability in the Middle East following the Hamas terrorist attack. There were also unofficial claims that the U.K. had supplied Ukraine with most of the defense equipment it could have given without risking its own defense potential. Shapps also announced tens of thousands of artillery projectiles for Ukraine. He also revealed the U.K.'s plans to train 30,000 more Ukrainian military personnel. Critics could not help but recognize the two faces the British official is showing to the public. One face is sympathetic to previous genocide victims and the other one supports ongoing wars with weaponry, despite awareness that many are dying and many more will in the coming days as the wars are being waged both in the Middle East and in Ukraine. Famine.news has more stories related to the mass starvation the ongoing conflicts are causing.

  • Bill Gates ‘Digital IDS’ Will Be Mandatory To Participate in Society

    https://expose-news.com/2023/11/07/bill-gates-digital-ids-will-be-mandatory-to-participate-in-society/ Tomorrow, November 8th 2023, a virtual launch event is to take place for what is termed the “50-in-5” agenda. The United Nations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and partners of the Rockefeller Foundation are launching a campaign to accelerate digital ID, digital payments, and data sharing rollouts in 50 countries under the umbrella of digital public infrastructure (DPI) by 2028. (source). The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) has announced plans to rollout “digital IDs” worldwide by the year 2030, and they will be mandatory for people who wish to participate in society, say Reclaim the Net, who advocate for free speech and individual liberty online, Social Credit System The push for DigitalPublic Infrastructure (DPI) which includes. “Digital IDs,” vaccine passports, and central bank digital currencies (CBDC) – is being championed by the globalist WEF and unsurprisingly is backed by the Bill Gates along with the the UN, and the European Union (EU). The Sociable editor Tim Hinchliffe says that “Advocates are adamant that DPI is essential for participation in markets and society — just like we saw with vaccine passports — only on a much broader scope and “If successful, DPI will give governments and corporations the power to implement systems of social credit that can determine where and how you can travel, what you are allowed to consume, and how you will be able to transact with your programmable money. “Think individual carbon footprint trackers, Ultra Low Emission Zones (ULEZ), and CBDC programmed to restrict “less desirable” purchases — all of which are being pushed by proponents of the great reset.”(source) The “50 in 5” Campaign The “50 in 5” bills itself as “a country-led advocacy campaign. By 2028, the 50-in-5 campaign will have helped 50 countries design, launch, and scale components of their digital public infrastructure,” according to the official announcement. The 50 countries are designated as global testbeds, (guinea pigs) and the DPI’s will first in Africa (sub-Saharan, particularly) and India but the plan is to roll digital IDs globally by 2030 to include all citizens of UN member-states, according to Planet Today “50 in 5” campaign is also unsurprisingly a collaboration between the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the United Nations Development Program, the Digital Public Goods Alliance, and Co-Develop. Co-Develop was founded by The Rockefeller Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Nilekani Philanthropies, and the Omidyar Network. The Digital Public Goods Alliance lists both the Gates and Rockefeller foundations in its roadmap showcasing “activities that advance digital public goods,” along with other organisations and several governments. (Source) DPIs are being sold as a mechanism for financial inclusion, convenience, improved healthcare, and green progress. but is is an “all inclusive phrase applied to a looming technocratic governance system powered by three foundational components: digital ID, digital payments like Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), and massive data sharing.” The World Economic Forum WEF published a series of articles in September essentially pushing for DPI enforcement and of course, WEF is out there “thinking about the children” like the best of them, “Children’s rights around the world can be boosted by investing in digital public infrastructures,” said one caption in an article published on September the 18th, 2023, entitled@ ‘Two-thirds of child-related SDGs are off-pace to meet targets’: Here’s why we must invest in digital public infrastructure now.” “2023 marks the halfway point for achieving the United Nations’ sustainable development goals (SDGs)“, the WEF reminds us, this halfway mark “is an opportunity to “assess and recalibrate” efforts to realise the rights of every child, everywhere and with only seven years to go, to the 2030 target, two-thirds of child-related indicators are off-pace to meet their targets, according to a new UNICEF report, For Every Child a Sustainable Future. * 1.9 Billion Children Left Behind – If recent progress continues, only 60 countries, home to just 25% of the child population, will have met their targets by 2030, leaving around 1.9 billion children in 140 countries behind. * The world today looks unlikely to achieve the ambitious goals we set for children in 2015. * Hunger – The world, is back at hunger levels not seen since 2005, and food prices remain higher in more countries than in the period from 2015 to 2019. * Children are Lacking Foundational Skills – While in education, data shows that 600 million children and adolescents are not acquiring foundational reading and math skills and 11 million additional ten-year-olds lacking foundational skills. The “Solution” to the “Problem”? The “problem” the WEF says, has been the pandemic, of course, which “worsened the situation,” and the digital public infrastructure, is the “solution.” as it has been identified as a “key transition required for accelerating SDG action and results for children by 2030.” Protecting the “rights or safety of children” has been a tactic used before by the unelected globalists, while promoting a technocratic system that will actually take away the rights of all individuals, including children’s. Reclaim the Net, say that essentially, “DPI is a buzzword used in somewhat interesting/alarming concord by organizations such as the UN, but also the European Union (EU), the Gates Foundation, and of course, the World Economic Forum (WEF) is never quite out of any such picture. “What DPIs are supposed to do, in the best case scenario, is aid development in a number of ways. Those looking deeper into platitudes and “corporatespeak” coming from these organizations, however, are dismissing the term and the policy as a ruse to speed up introduction of digital IDs and payments, with a deadline of 2030.” The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. will be there for the launch of “50 in 5” program on November 8th for “50in5” program. “and why not”Reclaim the Net, ask, “the group’s Digital Public Goods Alliance and Co-Develop has taken the center-stage of a lot of this effort.” They conclude, “if you’re a citizen of a UN member-state, and your government (i.e., taxpayers) are contributing to various UN efforts and, you feel either uneasy, or just insufficiently informed about all this, well, too bad. They’re going ahead anyway.” (source).

  • Gates-Funded Plan to Vaccinate 86 Million Girls Against HPV Will ‘Unleash Mass Casualty Event,’ Crit

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/gates-gavi-invest-vaccinate-african-girls-hpv/ Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance is investing more than $600 million to reach its goal of vaccinating 86 million girls in low- and middle-income countries by 2025. The alliance is funded in large part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. An international campaign — funded in large part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation — to inject tens of millions of young girls with the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is drawing fire from critics who allege the vaccine will cause far more harm than good. Claiming the initiative will avert “over 1.4 million future deaths,” Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance announced it is investing more than $600 million to reach its goal of vaccinating 86 million girls in low- and middle-income countries by 2025. The Gates Foundation co-founded Gavi and is one of its four permanent board members. UNICEF, the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO) — whose second-largest donor is Gates — hold the other permanent seats. The Clinton Health Access Initiative also sits on the board. James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., a critic of the global HPV vaccine campaign, suggested mass vaccination will cause a devastating number of serious side effects among young girls, even though there are still no studies showing the HPV vaccine prevents cancer, despite claims to the contrary by vaccine makers and public health officials. Lyons-Weiler, head of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge, told The Defender: “In 2009, we were told the Severe Adverse Event [SAE] rate of HPV vaccines was 6.5%. But a study we published in Science, Public Health Policy & The Law showed that the adverse events profile of the HPV vaccine is far worse than has been reported. “Unleashing this vaccine on millions of girls and young women will lead to a mass casualty event these countries do not now have, and do not need. SAE’s will occur at the rate of 65,000 per million women vaccinated, and the claimed net benefits of the vaccine are just not there.” ‘No eligible girl … left behind’ Nigeria earlier this month became the latest country in Africa to promote HPV vaccines by introducing the vaccine into its routine immunization program and announcing an initial drive to vaccinate 7.7 million girls — the largest number yet in a single round of HPV vaccination in Africa. Gavi said Nigeria’s initiative would kick off with a five-day mass vaccination drive in schools and communities in 16 of Nigeria’s 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory. Phase 2 of the campaign will launch in the rest of the country in May 2024. Gavi, UNICEF, the WHO and other “unnamed partners” are providing financial support so Nigeria’s Federal Ministry of Health can offer the vaccines at no charge across the country. Gavi is co-financing vaccine purchases and providing technical support. The WHO paid to train workers and set up vaccination sites. UNICEF is providing 15 million vaccines, infrastructure for cold storage and logistical support. It is also running radio and TV ads “in multiple local languages to dispel misinformation and rumours,” the press release said. The partners trained over 35,000 health workers to deliver the vaccines at 4,163 sites across the 16 states participating in phase one of the rollout “to ensure no eligible girl is left behind.” Mobile vaccination units will be sent to remote communities. “Gavi-supported vaccine introductions” for the HPV vaccine have been hindered by global supply shortages, the press release said, but those supply issues are being overcome “thanks to years of market-shaping efforts to develop a more robust vaccine market.” HPV Gardasil vaccine-producer Merck, which has invested heavily in shaping the market since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the drug in 2006, last week announced that its 2023 third-quarter Gardasil sales grew 13% to $2.6 billion. Merck is one of Gavi’s key partners in distributing vaccines in low- and middle-income countries worldwide. The vaccine rollout in Nigeria comes on the heels of a similar Gavi-led — and UNICEF-, WHO- and Clinton Health Access Initiative-supported — national HPV campaign launched in Indonesia in August to add HPV vaccine to that country’s routine schedule. The initiative aims to vaccinate 90% of girls there. Bangladesh also launched a similar national HPV vaccine rollout in October, aiming for 100% coverage. Zambia launched the same initiative in September, vaccinating 1.42 million girls ages 9-14 in six days. Sierra Leone introduced the vaccine into its routine vaccination program in October and Eritrea launched a nationwide vaccine program in November 2022. These programs are part of a 2020 program initiated by the WHO’s World Health Assembly to eradicate cervical cancer as a public health problem worldwide. Gavi, Gates and the African HPV vaccine rollout Gavi, the WHO and UNICEF are interconnected in a number of ways. Gavi is a public-private partnership launched in 1999 at a World Economic Forum meeting. By its own count, it has vaccinated 1 billion children since then, by employing “innovative finance and the latest technology.” Gavi has long been criticized for placing too much emphasis on novel vaccines developed by its pharmaceutical partners rather than ensuring that basic vaccination is carried out, for being largely “top-down” and for subsidizing Big Pharma through questionable contracts and incentives — all in the name of “saving children’s lives,” according to scholar Anne-Emanuelle Birn, Sc.D. The Gates Foundation maintains a heavy hand in directing Gavi. Although as a “public-private partnership” its private donor list includes upwards of 50 individual corporations, most of them have donated only between $200,000 and a few million dollars to Gavi. The Gates Foundation has donated $4.1 billion to date. In addition to the seats held by the Gates Foundation, the WHO, UNICEF and the Clinton Health Access Initiative, board members include representatives from donor countries — of which the U.S. is the largest donor — and countries targeted by Gavi’s interventions. Industry representatives include Andrew Otoo, who holds a doctorate in pharmacy, formerly of Pfizer and now representing Merck, and Sai Prasad of Bharat Biotech. A number of “independent individuals” drawn from global finance and government also sit on the board, along with one representative of civil society organizations. Gavi has been distributing the HPV vaccine in Africa since 2011 when it financed Rwanda’s program to be the first African nation to implement a national HPV vaccine program aimed at girls under age 15. Today it purports to have 90% coverage for girls in Rwanda. Although Gavi’s logo, not the Gates Foundation’s, appears on the HPV promotional literature and press releases, researchers have argued that Gates’ substantial funding for Gavi and the WHO, and the foundation’s research grantmaking give it outsized power to drive global and local health priorities and spending. The Gates Foundation in September awarded a nearly $2 million, five-month grant to the Sydani Group in Nigeria, which is providing technical assistance for Phase 1 of Nigeria’s vaccine rollout. The foundation also funded the HPV trials in low- and middle-income countries such as India and Kenya that justify mass vaccination and that are used to make dose recommendations, some of which have ended in scandal. The campaign to eradicate cervical cancer is reminiscent of the Gates Foundation’s previous campaign, also initiated by the WHO and supported by Gavi, UNICEF and others, to eradicate polio. That campaign eventually faltered and also led to “a massive outbreak of vaccine-derived infections” that “engulfs much of Africa,” the BMJ reported. By the end of 2020, Gavi funded the introduction of the HPV vaccine in 13 African countries. Now, it is behind the new round of rollouts. “I am deeply disturbed by continuing Big Pharma/GAVI/WHO attacks on African people, at the tip of blatantly unnecessary, dangerous and expensive injections,” Shabnam Palesa Mohamed of Children’s Health Defense Africa told The Defender. “It is critical that we strengthen our efforts to raise awareness in Africa about Big Pharma crimes and informed consent.” But, she added, there is a lot of resistance to this program by African people. “African countries fulfilled an important role in rejecting most dystopian amendments to the International Health Regulations at the WHO’s World Health Assembly 75 last year.” Experts ‘profoundly concerned’ about likely adverse events According to Gavi, nearly 80-90% percent of the approximately 300,000 deaths per year from cervical cancer — the fourth most common cancer among women — occur in low- and middle-income countries and the majority occur in sub-Saharan Africa. About 8,000 Nigerian women die per year from cervical cancer in Nigeria, Muhammad Ali Pate, the coordinating minister of Health & Social Welfare, said. The higher rates are largely attributed to low screening coverage for cervical cancer and limited treatment options in the region, although actual numbers vary widely from country to country. The HPV virus can lead to cervical cancer, but the vast majority of infections clear on their own. There are more than 150 strains of HPV. High-risk HPV types can cause cervical cell abnormalities that are precursors to cancer, although HPV infection is not the sole risk factor for cervical cancer. Regular pap screening has been found to reduce the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer among women by at least 80%. But Gavi argues, “Cervical cancer is almost entirely vaccine-preventable, which means that alongside screening for early detection, rolling out the HPV vaccine is critical to preventing infections.” Public health officials like Dr. Diane Harper from the University of Michigan’s Department of Family Medicine celebrate Gavi’s strategy. Harper told The Defender, “Nigeria is making awesome strides in eliminating the risk of cervical cancer in its population by vaccinating its girls.” Lyons-Weiler disagreed: “First, the studies never showed that HPV vaccines reduce the incidence of cervical cancer. “Instead, they showed the HPV vaccines reduce the prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, a precondition sometimes associated with cervical cancer, associated with HPV-vaccine targeted HPVs. “The second important point, and this is directly related to the first, is that the biomedical research literature is filled with studies that show that HPV vaccination programs have actually caused the replacement of the previously most common types of HPVs with rarer types of HPVs that also cause cancer. This is known as HPV-type replacement. “Rarer types of HPVs can be less common because they are more deadly. So this means that HPV vaccine programs should lead to an increase in cervical cancer rates even in fully vaccinated populations, involving more aggressive cancers at an earlier age.” Studying HPV vaccine efficacy for eliminating cervical cancer is challenging due to the length of time between infection and the development of cancer (mean time 23.5 years), lack of adequate informed consent, complexity between HPV infection and cervical cancer, and the negative impact of girls’ sexual behavior, which may worsen the risks of cervical cancer. ‘Merck cares more about profit than it does people’ The Gardasil vaccine has been linked to myriad adverse events. Some of the signature impacts observed following HPV vaccination include permanently disabling autoimmune and neurological conditions such as postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, or POTS, fibromyalgia and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. There have been thousands of reports of adverse events worldwide. Peer-reviewed scientific literature from the U.S., Australia, Denmark, Sweden, France and Japan, and statistics published by public health agencies in each of these countries demonstrate plausible associations between HPV vaccination and autoimmune conditions. Merck keeps a database of such reported adverse events but does not make that information public. A North Carolina district judge ordered Merck to turn over all of its Gardasil adverse events databases to plaintiffs suing the pharmaceutical giant for injuries allegedly caused by the vaccine. The federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid out more than $70 million to people making claims regarding Gardasil for injuries. There are currently about 80 cases pending against Merck for vaccine injuries in federal court in the U.S. Michael Baum, senior partner at Wisner Baum and the attorney representing vaccine-injured plaintiffs in several lawsuits against Merck, told The Defender that the data on HPV vaccine injuries in the U.S. raises serious concerns about Nigeria’s mass vaccination program: “U.S. data makes it clear that vaccinating millions of Nigerian girls with Gardasil will cause a staggering number of serious adverse events, including death. Before COVID, Gardasil had more adverse event reports in the U.S. than any other vaccine. “We know it is dangerous, and on top of that, its efficacy in preventing cervical cancer has never truly been established. There is not a single study that shows Gardasil can prevent cervical cancer because Merck’s studies were not designed to establish that claim. Nevertheless, Merck markets Gardasil around the world as a ‘cervical cancer vaccine.’ “If the company were interested in backing up this claim, it would have conducted long-term studies by now. But it hasn’t. I believe the sad truth is Merck cares more about profit than it does people.” According to an article in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, most low- to middle-income countries have very low reporting rates for adverse events associated with vaccines or other pharmaceutical products, so it is difficult to know how many adverse events have been associated with the rollouts that have happened so far. Lyons-Weiler told The Defender that resources now going into vaccination should instead go toward cervical cancer screening, which for most people is a curative diagnostic. “Early detection is key, and delaying screening because one feels protected due to the misleading narrative over HPV vaccines protecting against cervical cancer will lead to increased cases of late-stage cancer, and deaths,” he said. Harper also supported screenings, but also strongly supported the vaccines. “It is not a question of investing only in vaccination or only in screening. Both are necessary. Compromises in the amount of finite money allocated to each will be necessary, but both are necessary.” Kim Mack Rosenberg, CHD acting general counsel and co-author of “The HPV Vaccine on Trial” told The Defender: “Having studied the HPV vaccines in depth for several years, I am profoundly concerned about Nigeria’s mass vaccination campaign. Instead of vaccinating millions of girls, steps should be taken to reduce risk factors that may contribute to cervical cancer, including early pregnancy and multiple pregnancies, poor nutrition and poor nutritional status, lack of access to clean cooking fuels, and others. “Moreover, there have been so many innovations in cervical cancer screening that now enable doctors and others to more easily screen, even in rural areas.” Different dose recommendations for high vs. low/middle-income countries? In the U.S., the current HPV vaccination schedule recommended by the CDC is two doses of Merck’s Gardasil 9 vaccine for children ages 9-14 and three for those ages 15 and up. Gardasil 9, which protects against 9 HPV strains, is the only HPV vaccine distributed in the U.S. Nigeria’s vaccine advisory committee in 2021 recommended Gardasil’s quadrivalent HPV vaccine for use in Nigeria, which protects against four strains. When the vaccine first came on the market, the WHO recommended a three-dose course of any version of the vaccine — but in 2014, it changed its recommendation to two doses as part of routine vaccination. Last year, the WHO announced that “a single-dose Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine delivers solid protection against HPV,” and it changed its recommendations again to “a one or two dose schedule” for girls and women ages 9 and up, based on “evidence emerging over past years,” but without any citations. But most of the press release celebrated the single-dose recommendation as “less costly, less resource intensive and easier to administer,” predicting that it would be a “game-changer,” adding that “a single-dose recommendation has the potential to take us faster to our goal of having 90 per cent of girls vaccinated by the age of 15 by 2030.” Lyons-Weiler said the language around dosing was “absolutely misleading,” because the shift to “one or two doses” doesn’t actually make a shift from the recommended two-dose schedule, but might make it easier to get buy-in to the program by skeptics.

  • Honey Plus Coffee Beats Steroid For Treating Cough

    https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/honey-plus-coffee-beats-steroid-treating-cough-1 One of modern medicine's most celebrated 'miracle drugs' are steroids, but a recent double-blind, randomized clinical trial found that honey plus coffee outperformed prednisolone in treating symptoms of post-infectious, persistent cough. A remarkable study looking at natural alternatives to medications found that compared to a systemic steroid, a combination of honey and coffee was superior in reducing symptoms associated with a post-infectious cough (PPC). PPC is a cough that remains after a common cold or an upper respiratory tract infection for more than three weeks, and in some cases as long as several months. Conventional treatment may involve any number of powerful drugs, many of which have serious side effects, including codeine and dextromethorphan (so-called centrally acting antitussives), antihistamines, narcotics, and bronchodilators. The study, published in Primary Care Respiratory Journal, was conducted by researchers at Baqiyatallah University Hospital, Tehran, Iran from 2008 to 2011.[i] 97 patients who had experienced PPC for more than three weeks were randomized in double-blinded fashion into three groups: 1. A jam like paste was prepared which consisted of 20.8 grams of honey plus 2.9 grams of instant coffee for the first group ('HC'). 2. 13.3 mg of prednisolone for the second group (steroid, 'S'). 3. 25 mg of guaifenesin for the third group (control, 'C'). The researchers described the patient treatment protocol as follows: "The participants were told to dissolve a specified amount of their product in warm water and to drink the solution every eight hours for one week. All the participants were evaluated before treatment and one week after completion of treatment to measure the severity of their cough. The main outcome measure was the mean cough frequency before and after one week's treatment calculated by a validated visual analogue cough questionnaire score." The results of the study are summarized in the following table: As you can see by the table above, the honey-coffee group saw their degree of cough frequency decrease from 2.9 before treatment to .2 after treatment, whereas the prednisolone group decreased only from 3.0 before treatment to 2.4 after treatment. They detailed are as follows: "RESULTS: There were 97 adult patients (55 men) enrolled in this study with the mean of age of 40.1 years. The mean (+/- SD) cough scores pre- and post-treatment were: HC group 2.9 (0.3) pre-treatment and 0.2 (0.5) post-treatment (p < 0.001); steroid ('S') group 3.0 (0.0) pre-treatment and 2.4 (0.6) post-treatment (p < 0.05); control ('C') group 2.8 (0.4) pre-treatment and 2.7 (0.5) post-treatment (p > 0.05). Analysis of variance showed a significant difference between the mean cough frequency before and after treatment in the HC group versus the S group (p< 0.001). Honey plus coffee was found to be the most effective treatment modality for PPC." [emphasis added] The researchers reflected on the implications of their findings: "Each year, billions of dollars are spent on controlling and trying to cure cough while the real effect of cough medicines is not quite reliable.1,45 Even though PPC is reported to account for only 11-25% of all cases of chronic cough8 and it is not associated with disability and mortality, it can cause morbidity and is responsible for medical costs...13 Honey and coffee are natural edible substances that are safe, agreeable, less expensive than medicines, and easily available. Moreover, they have proved to be effective in a short period of time." Prednisone is a semi-synthetic hormone with a broad range of side effects, some of which are life threatening. Given the relative safety and superior effectiveness of honey plus coffee versus prednisolone, this study adds to a growing body of biomedical research indicating that natural substances, including spices, vitamins and foods, are often superior in efficacy to synthetic drugs while often maintaining far higher levels of safety relative to them. Learn more about the health benefits of coffee by reading our featured article: Coffee: Medicine for the Body and Soul and search the GreenMedInfo coffee database below: Reference [i] Mohammad Ali Raeessi, Jafar Aslani, Neda Raeessi, Homa Gharaie, Ali Akbar Karimi Zarchi, Fereshteh Raeessi. Honey plus coffee versus systemic steroid in the treatment of persistent post-infectious cough: a randomised controlled trial. Originally published: 2013-10-22 Article updated: 2019-01-28

bottom of page