Search Results

https://www.newstarget.com/2023-09-12-scientists-unite-to-end-climate-emergency-hysteria.html Despite being skeptical that mainstream media would pick up this breakthrough story, 1609 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, gathered together to sign a declaration, proclaiming that "there is no climate emergency." The main goal is to end the mass climate hysteria and the destruction this clamor brings to the U.S. economy. "There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero [carbon dioxide] CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works whatever the causes are," the document signed by Nobel prize recipients John F. Clauser from the U.S. and Ivar Giaever from Norway/U.S. and the others emphasized. They also note that climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. According to them, scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in the predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures. The proclamation also pointed out that Earth is undergoing cold and warm phases and they are natural phenomena and the gap between the real and modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change. "The geological archive reveals that Earth's climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming," adding that warming is even far slower than what was predicted on the basis of modeled anthropogenic or human activity forcing. Lately, climate alarmists and globalists are also pushing for CO2 emission reduction, even resorting to measures of taxing animals' burps and farts just to make sure CO2 is reduced. However, the scientists dispelled this narrative. "CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. More CO2 is favorable for nature, greening our planet. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also profitable for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide." They do not only exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases but they also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial. In fact, as per the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), when trees absorb and store CO2 in their fibers, it helps to clean the air. According to the Arbor Day Foundation, a mature tree absorbs more than 48 pounds of CO2 from the atmosphere in one year and releases oxygen in exchange. "So, you'd actually want more trees. If you actually believe the climate change narrative, you'd actually think that the solution is to plant more trees," award-winning investigative reporter Joshua Philipp pointed out during an episode of EpochTV's "Crossroads." Additionally, the declaration highlighted how global warming has not increased natural disasters as there has not been any statistical evidence that it is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts, or other such natural disasters, or making them more frequent. Meanwhile, there is ample evidence that CO2 mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. Politics and MSM distort the true message of "climate change" Professor Steven Koonin, former Undersecretary for Science at the U.S. Department of Energy and author of the 2021 bestseller, "Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn't and Why It Matters," said in his book that what the largely unreadable (for laymen) and complicated science reports say on climate change is completely distorted by the time their contents are filtered through a long line of summary reports of the research by the media and the politicians. "There are abundant opportunities to get things wrong – both accidentally and on purpose – as the information goes through filter after filter to be packaged for various audiences... It's not only the public that is ill-informed about what the science says about climate," he said, detailing how the government and UN press releases do not accurately reflect the reports themselves. "Distinguished climate experts (including report authors themselves) are embarrassed by some media portrayals of the science," he further stated. During an "Uncommon Knowledge" interview with Peter Robinson, Koonin revealed that his colleagues' reactions to his book were that he should not be telling the public or the politicians the truth about climate change. "I was taught that you tell the whole truth [as a scientist]. And you let the politicians make the value judgments and the cost-effectiveness trade-offs and so on," Koonin said. He noted as well the immorality of asking the developing world to cut down emissions when so many do not even have access to electricity and the immorality of scaring the younger generations: 84 percent of American teenagers believe, as of January 2022, that if climate change is not addressed, "it will be too late for future generations, making some part of the planet unlivable." In March, the White House released a report "undermining any claims of an ongoing climate crisis or imminent catastrophe," Koonin wrote in July. "The report's authors should be commended for honestly delivering likely unwelcome messages, even if they didn't make a show of it. The rest of the Biden administration and its climate-activist allies should moderate their apocalyptic rhetoric and cancel the climate crisis accordingly. Exaggerating the magnitude, urgency and certainty of the climate threat encourages ill-considered policies that could be more disruptive and expensive than any change in the climate itself." However, President Joe Biden continues with his radical policies and fearmongering. "I don't think anybody can deny the impact of the climate crisis anymore," he said, commenting on Hurricane Idalia on August 30. "Just look around. Historic floods. I mean, historic floods. More intense droughts, extreme heat and significant wildfires have caused significant damage."

https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/dismantling-virology-the-viral-theory HAS THE EXISTENCE OF POLIO, MEASLES, HIV, CMV, EBV, HEP C, EBOLA, THE FLU, ZIKA AND NOW CORONA VIRUSES BEEN DEMONSTRATED AND SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN?

It seems there might be some truth to a genocide of blacks in Australia... but it wasn't the whites who did the killing. The current black mobs in Australia killed off the real original inhabitants of Australia, the one meter tall pygmy aboriginals and all recorded by multiple independent sources.

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/13/over-1600-scientists-sign-declaration-there-is-no-climate-emergency/ “There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.” World Climate Declaration. As reported on the Expose last week, the government proposed Net Zero policies that would grant them the power to create new criminal offences and also increase penalties for those who fail to adhere to energy consumption regulations, and provide, what they would term “false information” regarding energy efficiency. These Net Zero policies are therefore possibly the most fascistic, coercive, and expensive set of policies they have ever tried to impose on the UK people. The state is, of course deliberately ignoring the fact that their Climate “science” has been debunked by experts, and now there are more than 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, who have signed a declaration saying that “There is no climate emergency” at all. The scientists who have signed the declaration including 142 from the UK alone, state: “To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. Should not we free ourselves from the naive belief in immature climate models?” If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and re-adapt. The aim of global policy should be ‘prosperity for all’ by providing reliable and affordable energy at all times. In a prosperous society men and women are well educated, birthrates are low and people care about their environment. World Climate Declaration plus all signatories in pdf The declaration is unlikely to get any attention from the mainstream media, unfortunately, but it is important for people to know about: the mass climate hysteria and the destruction of the US economy in the name of climate change need to stop,” writes researcher Robert Williams in the Gatestone Institute, who is author of the article below. “Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” states the declaration signed by the 1,609 scientists, including Nobel laureates John F. Clauser from the US and Ivar Giaever from Norway/US. The statement adds: “Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures… “The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming. “Warming is far slower than predicted… “The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change. “Climate policy relies on inadequate models Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. They do not only exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases, they also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial… “Global warming has not increased natural disasters There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2 mitigation measures are as damag­ing as they are costly. “Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works whatever the causes are.” Professor Steven Koonin, former Undersecretary for Science at the U.S. Department of Energy under the Obama administration, current professor at New York University, and fellow at the Hoover Institution, authored the 2021 bestseller, Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn’t, and Why It Matters. In it, he states that what the largely unreadable (for laymen) and complicated science reports say on climate change is completely distorted by the time their contents are filtered through a long line of summary reports of the research by the media and the politicians. “There are abundant opportunities to get things wrong – both accidentally and on purpose – as the information goes through filter after filter to be packaged for various audiences… It’s not only the public that is ill-informed about what the science says about climate…” Koonin adds: “Government and UN press releases and summaries do not accurately reflect the reports themselves… Distinguished climate experts (including report authors themselves) are embarrassed by some media portrayals of the science.” In a recent interview, Koonin noted that his colleagues’ reactions to his book had been that he should not be telling the public or the politicians the truth about climate change. “I was taught that you tell the whole truth [as a scientist]. And you let the politicians make the value judgments and the cost-effectiveness trade-offs and so on,” Koonin said. He noted as well the immorality of asking the developing world to cut down emissions when so many do not even have access to electricity, and the immorality of scaring the younger generations: 84% of American teenagers believing, as of January 2022, that if climate change is not addressed, “it will be too late for future generations, making some part of the planet unlivable.” Of course, it would be helpful to research what can be done to relieve the problems brought about by man, such as the “hole in the ozone layer,” which is now closing, but climate change is not an apocalyptic emergency and needs to be attended to without bringing devastation to the hundreds of millions of people already in extreme poverty. The Biden administration, however, appears not to be concerned about the widespread poverty and massive starvation that will be caused by the unavailability of cheap and reliable energy in underdeveloped countries, or the inflation caused by the skyrocketing prices that are crushing Americans “barely able to afford one meal a day”. These are man-made problems, created by importing expensive (nearing $100 a barrel again) — often dirtier — oil from adversaries of the United States, such as Russia and Venezuela, instead of extracting it far less expensively at home. The Biden administration also does not seem concerned that so long as China and India keep burning coal – the Chinese Communist Party is permitting two new coal-power plants a week, easily canceling out whatever benefits the US might be providing, and reportedly exceeding “all developed nations combined” in carbon emissions. The Biden administration also does not seem concerned that it is killing wildlife, sea life and the fishing industry by installing offshore wind turbines along the Atlantic seaboard, or that mandating electric vehicles will throw virtually the entire auto maintenance industry out of work (EVs do not need routine maintenance), or that lithium batteries not only explode but cost thousands of dollars to replace. The administration even wants military equipment, such as tanks, to be electric, as if there were charging stations in the middle of foreign deserts in the event of a conflict. Moreover, according to NBC News, volcanoes, unimpressed with executive orders, “Dwarf Humans for CO2 Emissions.” The Biden administration does not even bother to act on its own climate findings: In March, the White House released a report about the impact of climate change on the US economy. “Its findings undermine any claims of an ongoing climate crisis or imminent catastrophe,” Koonin wrote in July. “The report’s authors should be commended for honestly delivering likely unwelcome messages, even if they didn’t make a show of it. The rest of the Biden administration and its climate-activist allies should moderate their apocalyptic rhetoric and cancel the climate crisis accordingly. Exaggerating the magnitude, urgency and certainty of the climate threat encourages ill-considered policies that could be more disruptive and expensive than any change in the climate itself.” But facts will not stop the Biden administration from forging ahead with its radical policies: “I don’t think anybody can deny the impact of the climate crisis anymore,” Biden, commenting on Hurricane Idalia, told reporters at the White House on August 30. “Just look around. Historic floods. I mean, historic floods. More intense droughts, extreme heat, significant wildfires have caused significant damage.” Never mind that much of climate change is apparently caused by sun flares, about which we can do nothing, and which, unlike commercial industries, do not offer grants; or that major wildfires are, ironically, exacerbated by “environmentalists” for refusing to let tinderbox brush be cleared lest the creatures there be disturbed other than by a wildfire. Climate expert Bjørn Lomborg suggests that the trillions of dollars needed to address climate change might be put to better use: “This isn’t an argument to do nothing but just to be smarter. To ensure we can transition from fossil fuels, we need to ramp up research and development to innovate down the price of green energy. We should invest across all options including fusion, fission, storage, biofuel and other sources. “Only when green energy is cheaper than fossil fuels will the world be able and willing to make the transition. Otherwise, today’s energy prices are just a taste of things to come.” Sources Gatestone Institute Clintel

Did your grandparents know this was happening in the USA in 1958? Organized child slavery (and perhaps more) right out in the open.

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/12/climate-change-is-key-to-implementation-of-great-reset/ Human-caused climate change is the globalist vehicle driving policies of limited mobility, energy control, dietary restrictions, and crackdowns on free society. Great Resetters Klaus Schwab and King Charles III seized on the fear propagated by the “covid pandemic” to implement their long-planned agenda. And the vehicle to achieve their “build back better,” a new social and economic order, is “climate change.” How Climate Change Policies Are Fuelling the Great Reset Agenda By Tim Hinchliffe When World Economic Forum (“WEF”) founder Klaus Schwab and Britain’s King Charles declared that it was time for a great reset three months into the covid-19 pandemic, it had little to do with fighting a coronavirus. Instead, they called the pandemic a “narrow window” and a “shrinking, golden opportunity” to seize the moment when people were most afraid and vulnerable to thrust upon them their long-planned agenda of a golden age out of the destruction of the old – to build back better – as they say. And although the coronavirus was the catalyst to set the great reset agenda in motion, the vehicle by which they would achieve their social and economic order out of chaos was climate change. “Some leaders and decision-makers who were already at the forefront of the fight against climate change may want to take advantage of the shock inflicted by the pandemic to implement long-lasting and wider environmental changes. They will, in effect, make ‘good use’ of the pandemic by not letting the crisis go to waste” – COVID-19: The Great Reset, Klaus Schwab & Thierry Malleret, 2020 Like covid and the war on terror, the enemy remains elusive, requires heavy taxpayer funding, and leads to total surveillance and control over society with the gradual erosion of individual freedom. Overlapping climate change policies such as limited mobility, energy control, dietary restrictions, and personalised lockdowns are fuelling the great reset of society and the global economy. All roads lead to a system of social credit powered by digital ID and Central Bank Digital Currencies (“CBDCs”). With climate change as the go-to bogeyman, here’s how some of these climate policies could play out in futuristic scenarios. Limited mobility: reducing private car ownership and air travel while introducing battery passports for electric vehicles and Ultra Low Emission Zones to keep people in their place Fossil fuels are to be reduced or completely eliminated, according to the WEF. Unelected globalists also envision a future where private car ownership is either completely abolished or limited to a fraction of its current capacity. The desire to transition to only electric vehicles, whose charging stations are mostly powered by fossil fuels, will lead to limited mobility as many people will not be able to afford them, along with other variables that affect performance like differences in temperature. Apart from the massive amount of unethical mining practices for natural resources that go into producing batteries for electric vehicles, the batteries themselves are planned to be fitted with “battery passports.” These battery passports serve as a form of digital ID that will track and trace where the vehicle has been – where you and I have been – and how the battery is performing. As electric vehicles become more self-driving, any infraction a driver may incur, such as driving where they’re not allowed, the vehicle could either shut itself off or drive itself to the nearest impound station. Until then, Ultra Low Emission Zones (“ULEZs”) will slowly be installed, replete with surveillance cameras, as the invisible walls of a digital prison are to be erected for the coming 15-minute cities. “If, in the post-pandemic era, we decide to resume our lives just as before (by driving the same cars, by flying to the same destinations, by eating the same things, by heating our house the same way, and so on), the COVID-19 crisis will have gone to waste as far as climate policies are concerned” – COVID-19: The Great Reset, Klaus Schwab & Thierry Malleret, 2020 Air travel, too, is desired to be severely limited, and your digital identity will be a key component of enforcement and compliance. Even if there isn’t an outright ban on air travel, the carbon tax will be so great that only the ultra-wealthy and influential will be able to fly. While efforts are being made to produce “sustainable aviation fuel,” the pledges to reduce emissions that would cut back on air travel are already being made before the infrastructure has even been put in place. But not to worry! In the eyes of unelected globalists, our thirst for travel will be quenched by the coming of the metaverse and 15-minute cities. Personalized lockdowns: by choice, compliance, or coercion powered by digital ID, CBDC, 15-minute cities, and the metaverse Fifteen-minute smart cities, the metaverse, smart homes, digital ID, and CBDC all converge into a form of personalised lockdown where we will either have no desire to travel, or we will be coerced or forced into compliance through digital means. Since the global elite place some of the blame on you and me for our contribution to the weather via our carbon footprints, the idea is to keep us docile in our tiny living spaces in massive high-rises as we immerse ourselves in the metaverse for work and play, pausing only to go downstairs to the gym, or perhaps opening our portholes to pick up the drone-delivered goods that we never truly own, but only rent. “Commuting less, working remotely a bit more, bicycling and walking instead of driving to keep the air of our cities as clean as it was during the lockdowns, vacationing nearer to home: all these, if aggregated at scale, could lead to a sustained reduction in carbon emissions” – COVID-19: The Great Reset, Klaus Schwab & Thierry Malleret, 2020 There will be no cash machines in these 15-minute cities. Payments are to be made with a swipe of a hand or an iris scan, and all transactions will be done in CBDC, which cannot function without a digital ID. Whether you are employed or artificial intelligence (“AI”) has made you part of the “useless class,” your paycheck or Universal Basic Income (“UBI”) will arrive in the form of a programmable CBDC that will be sent to your digital wallet, and there will limitations on where you can spend it, what you can spend it on, and when, including in the metaverse, where your digital ID will be the driver for a reputation-based social credit system. But the metaverse is not just a virtual reality space where business, pleasure, and imaginary travel can be conducted from the comfort of your couch. There is also an augmented reality aspect to this “ecosystem” where augmented reality (“AR”) glasses will have cameras and microphones turned on at all times, recording everything you see and hear, including everything in your home. In order to access the metaverse, a digital ID will be required, and it will store all the data collected from your AR glasses and smart devices in your home and on your person, including Fitbits, thermostats, fridges, mirrors, and just about any other Internet of Things (“IoT”) device in your smart home, which can all be accessed and controlled remotely. “The abundance of fake news and its ability to magnify and manipulate polarisation hinders our ability to deal successfully with the momentous collective action problems that humanity faces” – The Great Narrative, Klaus Schwab & Thierry Malleret, 2022 And in a future where public and/or private entities crackdown, anything you say will be recorded and can be used against you, using the Chinese Communist Party (“CCP”) social credit system as the blueprint. These crackdowns will take the form of limited purchasing power, limited mobility, and limited luxuries programmed onto your digital ID and CBDC to ensure that you stay in your personalised, invisible lockdown. But if your thoughts and words don’t get you into trouble, your consumption habits will – all in the name of saving the planet from your contribution to climate change. Dietary restrictions: reducing meat and dairy consumption, propping up lab-grown proteins and insect consumption, and … In order to save the planet from flatulent cows and fertilizer-favouring farmers, climate change alarmists are attempting to achieve net zero carbon emissions by limiting our diets. Meat and dairy, like travel, is to be limited and phased out, such as the culling of hundreds of thousands of cows, to make way for alternative proteins based on plant and insects, along with artificial meat. “The difference between ‘good governments’ and ‘bad governments’ will be measured by how fast they implement the transition to net zero while providing concomitantly a welfare policy that makes societies fairer and more prosperous” – The Great Narrative, Klaus Schwab & Thierry Malleret, 2022 Where “meat is difficult to track consistently along the supply chain,” alternative proteins that are produced in factories, farms, and a laboratory can all be fitted with sensors hooked up to the IoT for ultimate traceability stemming from centralised systems of control and surveillance. While real meat may still be available in limited amounts, it will be considered a luxury, and its purchase by individuals will be monitored and controlled via individual carbon footprint trackers programmed into your digital ID. Your CBDC will be programmed to either cut you off completely from going above your allowed limit of meat, or it will automatically deduct a hefty carbon tax. Lab-grown proteins will replace farmers as their land use is deemed unsustainable due to their carbon emissions. Farmers will either have to forcibly vacate, pay an extortionary carbon tax, or sell off their land for pennies on the dollar. Ordo ab chao clima The above scenarios, whether they come to any fruition in whole or in part, can be seen as either utopian or dystopian, depending on the person. Some people would have no problem with staying in their pods and eating bugs while virtually travelling to imaginary lands in the metaverse as they sit back and collect their UBI in CBDC. Others would not go so gently into that dark night. But while climate change has been the go-to bogeyman for implementing policies leading to mass surveillance and complete control over society, this particular “crisis” is sometimes temporarily swapped out with other perceived crises as they arise. Whether it’s the covid-19 pandemic, geopolitical conflict, the war on terror, rogue intelligence agencies meddling in foreign and domestic affairs, famine, or a potential cyber pandemic, the proposed solutions parallel those for climate change. In the end, they all call for the merging of corporation and state – public-private partnerships – to centralise power with the help of non-governmental organisations (“NGOs”) and unelected globalists with their digital armies and propagandists in the media. None of the dystopian scenarios mentioned need to come to pass. Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietam servitutemv – I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery. Note to censors, “fact checkers,” and advertising platforms: This op-ed has nothing to do with any “scientific consensus” about climate; it is a perspective on the potential outcomes of policies and solutions that have already been publicly proposed. About the Author Tim Hinchliffe is editor of The Sociable, a technology news blog that picks apart how technology transforms society and vice versa. Hinchcliffe is also an author of articles that cover technology and society, with perspectives on public and private policies proposed by governments, unelected globalists, think tanks, big tech companies, defence departments, and intelligence agencies. Previously, Tim was a reporter for the Ghanaian Chronicle in West Africa and an editor at Colombia Reports in South America.

The criminals who have highjacked our government are letting us know that America is over and we are now their slaves. https://gregreese.substack.com Elections have been rigged for centuries because government is a form of slavery. Which is why what the founding fathers of these United States gave us is so revered. They drafted a form of government unlike any other in history. A revolutionary form of governance based upon the foundation that all men are created equal and independent, and that all are born with the inherent and inalienable right to the preservation of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. George Washington wrote: “If men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences that can invite the consideration of mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the slaughter.” Benjamin Franklin wrote: “Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government: When this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins” And this is where we are at today. Our first amendment states that: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” And it has been stripped away from us by tyrants. NEWS host, Owen Shroyer, is being charged with the crime of questioning the results of the 2020 presidential elections, the most blatant election fraud in US history. And he did so peacefully which is his god-given right under the US Constitution. But America has already been defeated. And while many haven’t noticed, others don’t seem to care. Shroyer isn’t being charged with conspiracy, incitement, or any actual crime at all. He is being charged for exercising his freedom of speech. The sentencing document goes on for pages quoting him for saying what Americans on both sides of the crippling two-party system have been saying for over a century. In short, that the government is tyrannical and criminal. Which should be obvious to just about everyone at this point. And this is not a crime. It is the first line of defense against tyranny, our freedom to call it out. The document mentions a simple misdemeanor that involves Shroyer being on capitol grounds. This was a violation of a court order that resulted from a 2019 arrest when Shroyer stood and protested a House Judiciary Committee meeting. But this is not the crime he is being charged with. The 30-page sentencing document is nothing but hot air being blown by a legal team held on the leash by tyrants who occupy the halls of our government. What Shroyer is actually being charged with is best summarized on page 20 where it states: “his statements and actions after January 6 illustrate his complete lack of remorse. To date, despite a number of opportunities he has taken to speak about the election and January 6, he has yet to sincerely demonstrate genuine remorse for his conduct.” In other words, he won’t shut up about the stolen 2020 election. This is his god-given right. But the criminals who have highjacked we the people’s government are letting the rest of us know that those days are over, and we are now their slaves to be experimented on, thrown in jail, and murdered.

https://www.express.co.uk/comment/expresscomment/1809903/Uk-net-zero-rules-energy-bill-jail-for-new-zero-jacob-rees-mogg A piece of legislation snuck quietly through Parliament yesterday. If we don't fight it you might very well face jail time for non-compliance with new zero diktats on your home, writes Lois Perry. Back to work after the Summer recess,the UK Government introduced legislation related to net zero measures, which has set off major alarm bells amongst lovers of freedom across the country. Many are questioning the necessity and feasibility of the draconian net zero measures contained in the flagship Energy Bill which cleared the Commons at third reading yesterday, and they're rightly worried property owners facing criminal charges for opposing them. In fact, under this new legislation, those who fail to adhere to energy consumption regulations could face imprisonment for up to a year and fines of up to £15,000. Prosecutions may also occur for providing false information about energy efficiency or obstructing enforcement authorities. Most shockingly, the legislation provides for “the creation of criminal offences” where there is “non-compliance with a requirement imposed by or under energy performance regulations”. It seems the net zero row back from Starmer and Sunak due to public dissatisfaction with the ULEZ (Ultra Low Emission Zone) at the recent byelection was little more than a feint. The proposed legislation grants the Government (and it could be either party given the election next year) the power to create new criminal offences and increase penalties in pursuit of their net-zero globalist goals. Critics argue that this move starkly contradicts the will of the British people and fortunately has sparked a high degree of opposition from some members of the Conservative Party. The Government's ‘get out of jail’ card is that they do not intend to create new criminal offences but may simply need to amend existing laws, particularly those stemming from EU legislation like the Energy Performance of Buildings Regulations, which includes Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs). These amendments aim to provide stakeholders, including landlords, businesses, and tenants, with information to make informed decisions regarding energy efficiency. However, there are very real concerns that these amendments could lead to the criminalisation of individuals who do not comply with the new energy rules. It’s this pandemic-style shift in power dynamics – this time using the Climate rather than Covid - which is the source of worry for many. To address these concerns, it is vital for the electorate to communicate their views loud and clear to their Members of Parliament. It's crucial to ensure that the criminalisation of energy use without public consent does not become a reality. My organisation CAR26 conducted YouGov polls in October 2021 and February 2022, which revealed in both instances, that a significant proportion of the British public supports the idea of a net zero referendum. In fact the numbers supporting a referendum went up the second time around. This suggests that there is a desire for a more inclusive and democratic approach to shaping these policies. Before turning the questioning of net zero into a criminal offence, the Government should consider conducting a thorough review and hold a referendum to gauge public opinion. This would help ensure that the policies align with public sentiment and garner broader support. After all, our elected representatives always argue they work for you. If a referendum is not pursued (both Boris and now Rishi ruled it out so don’t hold your breath) it is essential to demand clear assurances from the Government that they will not enforce net zero targets without explicitly outlining them in an election party manifesto. The issue of net zero has become a significant point of contention in the UK. It is essential to engage in open and democratic discussions about the path forward to ensure that these policies reflect the will of the people and do not undermine fundamental democratic principles. Lois Perry is director of CAR26 a pressure group calling for "rationality" in climate matters.

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/12/cancer-heres-what-corporate-media-is-not-reporting/ Featured image: The success of the Covid jab has escalated the development of vaccines for cancer and other conditions, according to The Guardian, 7 April 2023 The incidences of cancer suddenly accelerated after the vaccine rollout began. In this article, Dr. Guy Hatchard considers what corporate media are currently reporting about rising cancer cases and what they could have investigated, but haven’t. Cancers Rise Dramatically in Tandem with Covid Vaccinations By Dr. Guy Hatchard A study published in BMJ Oncology this month entitled ‘Global trends in incidence, death, burden and risk factors of early-onset cancer from 1990 to 2019’ has reported a 79.1% rise in cancer incidence among people under 50 years of age during the last thirty years. This averages to a 2.6% annual rise. Over 350 news outlets around the world have published articles reporting the results. Developed nations, including North America, Western Europe, and Oceania (that’s New Zealand), are disproportionately affected. The authors suggest that: Dietary risk factors (diet high in red meat, low in fruits, high in sodium and low in milk, etc.), alcohol consumption and tobacco use are the main risk factors underlying early-onset cancers. In addition to these factors, the authors also explain that changes in lifestyle and environment since the turn of the 20th century, resulting in increased rates of obesity, physical inactivity, westernised processed diets, and environmental pollution, may have affected the incidence of early-onset cancer. These are, of course, alarming figures. Concern has been widely registered around the world. More than 1 million under 50s now die annually from cancer worldwide. The identification of possible causes in the study is helpful. It points to factors that are particularly prevalent in richer nations. What Has Been Happening Since 2019? You might have noticed that the study covers data up to the end of 2019, and you are perhaps wondering what is happening now. If you have been reading our reports, you probably know that up-to-date data on specific disease categories is hard to come by and might just be subject to some form of suppression. You have to dig around to get a hold of the current situation. Phinance Technologies, a company specialising in independent data mining and consultation, has published an analysis of UK disability claims over the last seven years (See ‘UK PIP Analysis – Body Systems’). The total number of new claims for Personal Independence Payments (“PIPs”) for all ages and all causes made by people claiming disability is graphed as follows: Source: Phinance Technologies The 2022 rate of new claims was 71% higher than the average 2016-2019 rate and mirrors the Covid vaccine rollout. Phinance Technologies also reports separate data for payments made to those suffering from disability due to cancer incidence. These payments increased by 35% in 2022 compared to the long-term average. An increase of 12,271 cases. Source: Phinance Technologies It is interesting that a 79% increase in early onset cancers over a thirty-year period has elicited global concern and publicity, whereas a 35% rise in cancer incidence over one year after the vaccine rollout began, a rate of 13 times higher, has been ignored by corporate media. How strange is that? Just imagine if these figures are being replicated around the world. That would amount to an additional 1 million cancer cases, being quietly swept under the rug. One million people are unaware of a possible deadly cause of their disease – covid vaccination – being administered by the same health professionals who say they are dedicated to preserving public health. The figures are even more concerning if you consider the increase in the total number of people applying for disability payments in the UK because they are unable to work due to various conditions – 372,000. If this is being repeated worldwide, in 2022 there will have been 31 million new cases of disability. A figure that is similarly being swept under the rug by medical authorities and governments. Here in New Zealand, we have few reasons to doubt the validity of these figures. The Household Labour Force Survey reports that there are 6,600 working-age people (15-64) who dropped out of the workforce through disability in the year since June 2021 when vaccination of this age group began. Leaked hospital data from the Wellington Region revealed a rising incidence of cancers. We know that our health service is overwhelmed, but we are still being offered puerile excuses by our politicians, medical authorities, and mainstream media. We are being treated daily to heart-wrenching personal stories in the press about working-age and student people who are falling ill or even dying unexpectedly. In a few cases, we are being told that we will have to wait for a coroner’s report to know why, but as long as public health data remains hidden, parents, friends and colleagues may never know why. No doubt there are multiple causes for serious illness and excess deaths including pre-existing conditions, delays in treatment due to pandemic lockdowns, long covid and covid infection, poverty, poor lifestyles, etc. But it seems from whatever data we do have that the most significant cause of appalling hospital statistics is likely to be quite different from the tired excuses currently being rolled out for public consumption. Watch THIS video to get an update on excess deaths by country which remains high in nations with high Covid vaccination rates, but are below the long-term average in countries with low vaccination rates. As long as complete public health data broken down by vaccination status, age and condition are being kept well-hidden and withheld from independent researchers no one will know what exactly is going on. Overseas data is now catching up with us. New Zealand can’t keep its head in the sand any longer. This needs to be a topic in election debates and at public meetings. Candidates are showing their disdain for the New Zealand public by refusing to address the growing evidence of covid-19 vaccine harms on a scale that dwarfs previous risks to public health. Time to wake up, get up to date and show some respect. Many people write to me, some of them performing important roles in society, expressing concern, regretting that there are few forums where they can make their concerns known. The cancellation of these voices, as well as continuing government funding of unqualified “fact-checkers” and so-called “disinformation experts” in the face of mounting scientific evidence of covid vaccine harm is becoming a serious matter. This week, I read an account of a former pillar of the UK media establishment and editor of the Independent on Sunday and the New Statesman, Peter Wilby. He spent years cancelling and denigrating victims of child abuse but has recently been exposed as a prolific collector of sickening explicit child sex abuse images. Wilby used his influence to craft a media environment which was hostile to whistle-blowers and journalists working to expose child sex abuse, characterising the victims as easily manipulated by overzealous reporters engaged in a witch-hunt. Wilby used his power in the media to call for “nuance” and a more relaxed and understanding stance towards abusers. We can’t help but feel threatened by how much power our media has to shape public narratives that don’t have a basis in reality. They have failed the New Zealand public. If we don’t learn from the pandemic, we have failed as a society to protect ourselves from abusers and misinformation. Our politicians need to take note, political ideology and belief devoid of relevant information do not amount to a public health policy with any chance of success.