The figures published for the week ending October 21 included a chart which showed that for all individuals over 30 years of age and who were double jabbed, the rate of infection was much greater than for those in the same age range who had not received any shot.

LONDON (LifeSiteNews) — After British government data on the rate of COVID infection showed that contraction of the virus was significantly higher among those who had received the jabs than those who hadn’t, the government has now retracted those graphics from its latest “vaccine surveillance” reports.
The U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA), the body which replaced the now-defunct Public Health England, publishes weekly updates “on the real-world effectiveness and impact of the COVID-19 vaccines,” collating the raw figures of recorded COVID infections from those aged 18 and over and categorizing infections according to vaccination status.
The figures published for the week ending October 21 included a chart which showed that for all individuals over 30 years of age and who were double jabbed, the rate of infection was much greater than for those in the same age range who had not received any shot.

It can be seen from the above figure that among 40–79-year-olds, the rate of infection is more than double in the “fully vaccinated” versus their unvaccinated counterparts, with “vaccine” effectiveness dropping to an all-time low of -131 percent in the 40–49 cohort and suggesting that the jabs may cripple the natural immune response.
The UKHSA defines vaccine effectiveness as “estimated by comparing rates of disease in vaccinated individuals to rates in unvaccinated individuals.”
Following an outcry of criticism from mainstream media in Britain, in which journalists and scientists criticized the UKHSA for “providing material for conspiracy theorists around the world” and the Office of Statistics Regulation (the U.K. statistics watchdog) labelled the reports as “potentially misleading,” the UKHSA backed down and has since amended its reporting to dispense of the charts detailing a decline in vaccine effectiveness.
The agency now reports infection figures in tabulated form without charting the rate of effectiveness of the jabs, leaving readers to calculate the rate of “vaccine” effectiveness themselves.
