After months of litigation by the Informed Consent Action Network (“ICAN”), a US court ordered that, by the end of September, the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) must produce the first batch of over 19 months’ worth of data collected from v-safe participants during the Covid-19 vaccination program. On 3 October, ICAN announced it had obtained CDC data for the approximate 10 million v-safe users:
The first batch of data, containing 144 million rows of health entries by v-safe users, has now been obtained by ICAN and you can search it using a user-friendly interface that ICAN worked around the clock to create … It … reveals shocking information that should have caused the CDC to immediately shut down its Covid-19 vaccine program.
Among numerous alarming results, out of the approximate 10 million individuals that registered and submitted data to v-safe, 782,913 individuals, or over 7.7% of v-safe users, had a health event requiring medical attention, emergency room intervention, and/or hospitalisation. Over 25% had an event that required them to miss school or work and/or prevented normal activities.
ICAN Obtains CDC V-Safe Data, Informed Consent Action Network, 3 October 2022
Dr. Guy Hatchard assesses what the v-safe evidence of high rates of vaccine harm means for New Zealand’s reporting system Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (“CARM”) and how it can be used to determine the true number of Covid vaccine injuries in New Zealand. He goes on to explore what this means in the wider context of the “pandemic” and the social compact – the implicit agreement between the governed and the government defining and limiting the rights and duties of each.
By Dr. Guy Hatchard
The pandemic response has broken the social compact
The Social Compact is an evolution of theories attributed to enlightenment philosophers Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau. In the modern context, a Social Compact is an implicit understanding between the government and the people and between individuals on the roles and responsibilities that each play. The aim is to ensure they can live successfully and safely together and shape the orderly and mutually fulfilling growth of society in both the present and the future.
Implicit in the social compact is the notion that differences of opinion, ideas, and styles of living can happily coexist. The belief that individuals and the government can rationally discuss and defend their ideas and proposals between each other without conflict and rancour. Except, that is, in the case of deliberate intention to cause harm.
The social compact has been broken because pandemic policies have imposed harm on individuals and society
The rate of adverse effects following Covid mRNA vaccination is more than fifty times that of any previous vaccine. Covid vaccination is strongly correlated with excess rates of all-cause mortality in countries across the globe. The normalisation of medically induced mortality marks the end of the social compact.
This involves one of the most disturbing results of pandemic policy—the denial and rejection of the accepted principles of medical causality. Suspicious deaths proximate to vaccination have been labelled “unrelated” or “cause unknown” because of the a priori assumption of Covid vaccination safety. Apart from death, a huge range of serious adverse effects have been labelled unrelated in the absence of reliable evidence. It cannot be overstated how concerning this is. It ranks among the great mistakes of history, where obvious truths have been overturned through coercion or propaganda.
The correct initial response, according to the pre-existing social compact, should have been a precautionary pause of vaccination, followed by further investigation involving collection and analysis of data including vaccination status, disease type or cause of death, and age. This has only been undertaken on data voluntarily reported on adverse event systems. These systems hugely underreport adverse events. CARM in New Zealand is estimated by Medsafe to only capture 5% of adverse events. Thus, the conclusions of its analysis are worthless statistically speaking and break the notion of medical ethics inherent in the social compact.
Just released data from the CDC indicates rates of vaccine adverse events greatly exceed historical background rates of conditions
Due to underreporting, CARM records that only 1 in 180 vaccinations resulted in any adverse event and only 1 in 3500 were judged to be serious. Medsafe then analysed these figures and concluded that this rate was lower than the rate of similar historical medical events in the general population. Therefore, Medsafe erroneously concluded they were of no concern.
Three days ago in the USA, after a prolonged legal battle, the CDC released the raw data from its v-safe adverse event monitoring program. V-safe involves 10 million users and facilitates the reporting of adverse events via the user’s smartphone. Among the alarming safety signals in the data set:
* Over 7.7% of v-safe users had a health event requiring medical attention, emergency room intervention, and/or hospitalisation.