Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?


https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475002100161X


Steve Kirsch, health philanthropist, feels validated, according to his Sept 26th post on Gab. Steve moved to Gab from Twitter feeling he could no longer tweet without risking account deletion. In Gab he posted, “Here’s the BOMBSHELL paper showing vaccines kill more people than they save... This paper validated my research.”

This paper:

  • Explains why the C_V_D-19 inoculations are operationally a "treatment" and not a vaccine.

  • Shows why the clinical trials did not predict either the seriousness of adverse events that have occurred as of mid-June (as reported in VAERS) or the potential extent of the underlying pre-symptomatic damage that has occurred as a result of the inoculations.

  • Summarizes the adverse events that have occurred as of mid-June (through reporting in VAERS) from the mass inoculation.

  • Presents biological evidence to support the potential occurrence of many more adverse effects from these inoculations in the mid- and long-term.

  • Examines why the normalized post-inoculation deaths are small, but not negligible, in children.

  • Provides a detailed analysis of the major clinical trials that were used to justify Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the inoculants presently being administered in the USA.

  • Presents a novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis of the C_V_D-19 inoculations that have been administered in the USA.


Explore the science that concludes:

  • People in the 65+ demographic are five times as likely to die from the inoculation as from COVID-19 under the most favorable assumptions!

  • The long-term cost-benefit ratio under the best-case scenario could well be on the order of 10/1, 20/1, or more for all the demographics, increasing with decreasing age.





Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?


Ronald N.Kostoff, Daniela Calina, Darja Kanduc, Michael B.Briggs, Panayiotis Vlachoyiannopoulos, Andrey A.Svistunov, AristidisTsatsakis

Download PDF


Highlights

Bulk of COVID-19 per capita deaths occur in elderly with high comorbidities.

•Per capita COVID-19 deaths are negligible in children.

•Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term.

•Clinical trials did not address long-term effects most relevant to children.

•High post-inoculation deaths reported in VAERS (very short-term).

Abstract

This article examines issues related to COVID-19 inoculations for children. The bulk of the official COVID-19-attributed deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, and the COVID-19 attributed deaths per capita are negligible in children. The bulk of the normalized post-inoculation deaths also occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, while the normalized post-inoculation deaths are small, but not negligible, in children. Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term (a few months), had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power because of their small size. Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases. Most importantly, the clinical trials did not address long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.

A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.

Graphical abstract


1-s2.0-S221475002100161X-main
.pdf
Download PDF • 1.26MB