top of page

My Items

I'm a title. ​Click here to edit me.

Japanese study finds mRNA injections cause cancer

Japanese study finds mRNA injections cause cancer

https://expose-news.com/2024/04/19/japanese-study-finds-mrna-injections-cause-cancer/ A newly published Japanese study confirms UK Professor Angus Dalgleish’s concerns about mRNA injections causing cancer.  After the findings of the study were published, Australian Professor Ian Brighthope has classified the injections as class one carcinogens. More than a year ago, Professor Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a renowned oncologist practising in the UK, first published his concerns that his patients with melanoma were relapsing after several years of being in remission. “I could find none of the usual causes but on further investigation, I realised that they had all had a booster covid vaccine between three weeks and three months before their cancer’s resurgence, the time in which their immune repression fails,” he wrote in The Conservative Woman on Monday. After raising the alarm that the vaccine boosters could induce cancer relapse, he became aware of literally dozens of people who had not had cancer before developing leukaemia and lymphomas after the boosters. In November 2022, Prof. Dalgleish wrote an open letter to the editor-in-chief of the medical journal The BMJ , urging the journal that harmful effects of Covid injections be “aired and debated immediately” because cancers and other diseases are rapidly progressing among “boosted” people. A few weeks later , he reported that other oncologists had contacted him to say they were seeing the same phenomenon of the recurrence of cancer in many melanoma patients who had been stable for long periods. “Since pointing this out publicly I have been contacted by many physicians and patients from all over the globe saying that they are not only seeing the same phenomenon but also an increase in other cancers especially colorectal, pancreatic, renal and ovarian,” he wrote at the beginning of this week. Many people had covid vaccines against their will, Prof. Dalgleish said. “Others gave in to the bullying of the NHS and GPs who hounded them with texts and calls (which I myself received regularly) about the importance of having a booster even though they presented no evidence that it could be beneficial.” Adding, “Having worked in vaccine development for a decade I remembered an adage that if a vaccine needs a booster, it doesn’t work!” In his latest article, Prof. Dalgleish highlighted several sources of evidence that have proved his concerns to be justified.  One source being a paper from Japan published last week. “It was available on a pre-publication server last year but now it has been peer-reviewed and published in  Cureus . Titled ‘ Increased age adjusted cancer mortality after the third mRNA lipid nanoparticle vaccine dose during the covid pandemic in Japan ’,” he said. The results are astounding. It shows there was a deficit for all cancers in the year 2020 when the first and second covid waves occurred. In 2021 there was an excess of deaths of 2.2 per cent and a 1.1 per cent increase in cancers. However, by 2022 the excess deaths had increased 9.6 per cent and cancer by 2.1 per cent. This paper was completed and published before the 2023 figures release which will almost certainly be much worse. What is remarkable here is that we are talking mortality, that is deaths from cancer not incidence of it. So what is the cause of this sudden increase? It is revealed in the title of the paper! Massive cancer deaths study vindicates my warnings over covid boosters, The Conservative Woman , 15 April 2024 In an article published on Wednesday, retired Australian medical practitioner Professor Ian Brighthope highlighted the same Japanese paper and said: Today, on behalf of my professional friends and medical colleagues, I declare the mRNA vaccines to be class one carcinogens. mRNA is also a broad-spectrum mutagen. mRNA must be banned internationally. mRNA is a class one carcinoge n , Ian Brighthope, 17 April 2024 He then went on to explain what carcinogens are, the process of carcinogenicity and how carcinogens are classified before inviting readers to make up their own minds about how carcinogenic mRNA injections are based on the findings of the Japanese study.   Below are some extracts from Prof. Brighthope’s article but we encourage readers to read his informative article in full . Carcinogens and Carcinogenicity Carcinogens are substances, organisms or agents capable of causing cancer by altering the cellular, genetic and epigenetic mechanisms within the body, leading to the transformation of normal cells into cancer cells. These agents can be chemical substances, viruses or even certain types of radiation therapies used to treat cancer. Carcinogens do not necessarily cause cancer in every case or under all circumstances. Factors such as the amount and duration of exposure, the individual’s genetic makeup and exposure to other environmental factors play a significant role in determining whether a person exposed to a carcinogen will ultimately develop cancer. Moreover, not all mutations caused by carcinogens lead to cancer; only certain mutations in specific genes that regulate cell growth, apoptosis, and DNA repair may result in uncontrolled cell proliferation and cancer. The process of carcinogenicity, also known as carcinogenesis or tumour genesis, involves multiple stages where normal cells undergo a series of changes at the cellular, genetic, and epigenetic levels, resulting in abnormal cell division and the formation of cancer. Breast Cancer Prevention Partners: Carcinogenesis | The transformation of normal cells to cancer cells, 13 November 2013 (2 mins) Classification of Carcinogens Carcinogens can be classified based on their mode of action into genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens. Genotoxic carcinogens directly interact with DNA and/or the cellular apparatus, affecting the integrity of the genome. Non-genotoxic carcinogens exert their effects through mechanisms that do not involve direct DNA damage. International Agency for Research on Cancer (“IARC”) Classification The IARC Monographs  identify factors that can increase the risk of human cancer, including lifestyle factors. Interdisciplinary working groups of expert scientists review the published studies and evaluate the weight of the evidence that an agent can increase the risk of cancer. Agents are then categorised as carcinogenic, probably or possibly carcinogenic, or not carcinogenic to humans, based on the strength of the evidence. The IARC Working Group also considers the body of evidence as a whole, to reach an overall evaluation of the carcinogenicity of the agent to humans. The categorisation of an agent into one of four groups is a matter of scientific judgment that reflects the strength of the evidence derived from studies in humans and in experimental animals and from mechanistic and other relevant data. The four IARC groups are: • Group 1: Sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity, the highest IARC classification for carcinogenicity. [Agents that are judged to fall into this category are also referred to as “class one carcinogens.”] • Group 2A (probably carcinogenic to humans) or Group 2B (possibly carcinogenic to humans): Limited evidence of carcinogenicity, a positive association. Group 3: Inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity. Group 4: Evidence suggesting lack of carcinogenicity.
World Cancer Research Fund (“WCRF”) and American Institute for Cancer Research (“AICR”) Classification The 2007 WCRF and AICR  Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective  report and subsequent tumour-specific updates are based on systematic reviews of the scientific literature for food, nutrition and physical activity. A WCRF and AICR Panel judged and graded the evidence into five categories: convincing, probable, limited (suggestive evidence), limited (no conclusion) or unlikely to affect cancer risk. Decide for yourselves the level of carcinogenicity that characterises mRNA After describing how carcinogens are classified, Prof. Brighthope invited readers to judge for themselves how mRNA injections should be classified by sharing the conclusion from the recently published Japanese study: Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukaemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive [ Estrogen Receptors Alpha -sensitive] cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than covid-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown. Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japa n , Cureaus, 8 April 2024 As the title of his article stated, Prof. Brighthope classifies mRNA injections as a “class one carcinogen.” Sources for this article include: mRNA is a class one carcinogen & a broad-spectrum mutagen , The Liberty Beacon, 18 April 2024

Reese Reports – Nanobots That Release Toxins And Harvest Energy From the Body

Reese Reports – Nanobots That Release Toxins And Harvest Energy From the Body

In a report for Infowars, Greg Reese says that the Moderna patent filed in 2020 lists variations for the technology that was used in their covid jabs and this technology contains self assembled nanoparticles. He supports these findings by citing Todd Callender’s team who have concluded that the jabs contain a variety of synthetic pathogens that can be released with external 5G frequencies and each have a catalogued IP address. Callender’s research shows that the technology is turning the human body into an antenna which can output energy. Meaning that humans are being turned into batteries to fuel the digital A.I. prison, Greg claims.

Bird flu does not transmit to humans; if it does it will be because it has been engineered in a lab

Bird flu does not transmit to humans; if it does it will be because it has been engineered in a lab

https://expose-news.com/2024/04/16/bird-flu-does-not-transmit-to-humans/ Featured image: A person in Texas caught bird flu after mixing with dairy cattle. Should we be worried?  The Conversation, 8 April 2024 The Bird flu virus has been modified in laboratories in the USA using gain-of-function to make it infectious and transmissible among mammals.  This research has been occurring for at least a decade.  During that time there have been laboratory accidents, one of which is known to have happened at the end of 2019.  It is these laboratory accidents that pose a risk of infection to humans and mammals, not the naturally occurring bird flu. On 25 March 2024, the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) was notified about a case of human infection with an influenza A (H5N1), bird flu , virus by the national authorities of Vietnam. According to the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005, a human infection caused by a novel influenza A virus subtype is an event that has the potential for high public health impact and must be notified to the WHO. WHO will then assess the risk posed to the general population based on available information.  In the case of the Vietnamese, WHO assessed the risk of this virus as low . On 1 April, a person in Texas tested positive for H5N1 bird flu. The Texan worked with dairy cows “presumably infected with H5N1 bird flu viruses,” the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) said .  This was the second human case of H5N1 bird flu reported in the United States. There was a previous case in 2022 in Colorado in a poultry worker.   The case of the Texan was also reported to WHO . WHO assessed the public health risk to the general population posed by this virus to be low and for occupationally exposed persons, the risk of infection is considered low-to-moderate. Related: Bird flu in 2005 was used to begin the biggest power grab in history – now it’s back Last week we published an article by Dr. Joseph Mercola who cautioned: “As we move forward, it is important for to keep an eye on the narratives we’re being fed. If bird flu becomes a human epidemic or pandemic, there are plenty of reasons to suspect it’s a weaponised virus, and the “solution” offered will be the same as that for covid-19: ‘Get vaccinated’.” Dr. Mercola also offered some advice on what to do should they release such a virus. John Leake agrees that any H5N1 epidemic would likely be due to a virus created in a laboratory. “H5N1 does NOT efficiently transmit to humans and therefore poses little risk to humans,” he notes. “Far more dangerous … is the possibility of a lab-modified H5N1 virus escaping from a laboratory.” A History of H5N1 Laboratory Accidents By John Leake Exactly one year ago, the investigative journalist and author, Alison Young, published  a report in  USA Today   on an accident that occurred on 9 December 2019 at the University of Wisconsin’s Influenza Research Institute. The accident involved experiments with an H5N1 influenza virus that had been modified through gain-of-function (“GoF”) to make it transmissible among ferrets. The research team leader – a renowned virologist named Yoshihiro Kawaoka – had gained international attention (or notoriety) for his controversial GoF research on H5N1. As Alison Young reported: … in late 2011 the world learned that two scientific teams – one in Wisconsin, led by virologist Yoshihiro Kawaoka, and another in the Netherlands, led by virologist Ron Fouchier – had potentially pushed the virus in that direction. Each of these labs had created H5N1 viruses that had gained the ability to spread through the air between ferrets, the animal model used to study how flu viruses might behave in humans. The ultimate goal of this work was to help protect the world from future pandemics, and the research was supported with words and funding by two of the most prominent scientists in the United States: Dr. Francis S. Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Kawaoka contended it would be “irresponsible not to study” how the virus might evolve in nature. “Some people have argued that the risks of such studies – misuse and accidental release, for example – outweigh the benefits.  I counter that H5N1 viruses circulating in nature already pose a threat ,” he said at the time. In November 2013, a needlestick accident happened on Kawaoka’s research team, followed by failure to adhere to the established quarantine rules. Though no human infection resulted from this accident, it was nevertheless alarming. Young’s report continues: By 2014, there was a growing discomfort at the highest levels of the US government about the risk of an accident with an engineered virus. Wisconsin’s needlestick incident, which drew questions within NIH but wasn’t publicly known, was soon followed by a series of high-profile accidents at federal labs in 2014 – from  safety breaches with anthrax and avian influenza at the CDC  to the discovery of  forgotten vials of smallpox  that had been kept for decades in a storage room on the NIH campus. In October 2014, citing these federal laboratory incidents, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy announced a  moratorium on new federal funding for certain gain-of-function research  while the risks and benefits of the controversial experiments were studied. The funding pause remained in place for three years until it was finally lifted in December 2017. But it was only in 2019 that some of the halted experiments were quietly allowed to begin again under a revised federal oversight process, which was criticised for keeping secret the details of the new experiments and the basis for the government approvals. The second accident on Kawaoka’s team occurred less than a year after GoF experiments were allowed to resume. This time, a laboratory researcher in training was working with ferrets infected with the GoF-modified H5N1 when his respirator hose was discovered to have detached from his hood, allowing him to breathe the possibly contaminated air in the cabinet. Again, the quarantine rules were not properly followed, and nor was the incident promptly reported to the NIH. Though the accident purportedly did not result in a human infection, it nevertheless raises many questions about the prudence of manipulating the H5N1 virus in a laboratory in order to make it infectious and transmissible among mammals. Alison Young’s report prompted me to start reading her book, ‘ Pandora’s Gamble: Lab Leaks, Pandemics, and a World at Risk ’,  published on 25 April 2023. Young has a long history of researching and reporting on biolabs and their checkered past. Most laboratory manipulation of pathogens is purportedly done to develop vaccines against them in the event that their natural iterations should ever evolve to infect humans, but this rationale is highly questionable if not downright mendacious. Indeed, on 18 December 2013, the Foundation for Vaccine Research wrote  a letter to the European Commission , signed by 56 scientists (including Nobel Laureates) in which they sharply criticised the GoF experiments on H5N1 by virologist, Ron Fouchier. The 56 scientists vehemently express their opinion that naturally occurring H5N1 does NOT efficiently transmit to humans and therefore poses little risk to humans. Far more dangerous, they claim, is the possibility of a lab-modified H5N1 virus escaping from a laboratory. The scientists refer to the resurgence of H1N1 influenza in 1977 after a 20-year hiatus, most likely after escaping from a laboratory in the former Soviet Union. About the Author John Leake is a true crime author and investigative journalist.  Among the books he has written is ‘ The Courage to Face Covid-19: Preventing Hospitalisation and Death While Battling the Biopharmaceutical Complex ’ which he co-authored with Dr. Peter McCullough .  Leake often publishes articles on Dr. McCullough’s Substack page titled ‘ Courageous Discourse ’ which you can subscribe to and follow HERE .

Interesting perspective on what's likely coming

Interesting perspective on what's likely coming

Lettuce Virus X and the weaponisation of food

Lettuce Virus X and the weaponisation of food

https://expose-news.com/2024/04/16/lettuce-virus-x-and-the-weaponisation-of-food/ In an article titled ‘ Virus X is Not What Anyone is Expecting ’ posted on her Substack, Karen Kingston highlighted an interview from more than 20 years ago with the late Michael Crichton , author of many bestselling novels including ‘ Jurassic Park ’. Crichton’s books have sold over 200 million copies worldwide , and over a dozen have been adapted into films. On 26 November 2002, Crichton was interviewed by American journalist and talk show host Charlie Rose   about his book  ‘Prey’ which was published that month .  He also discussed “the dangers of   self-replicating biosynthetic pathogens   (or what we call genetically modified viruses), gene editing and the dangers of  highly advanced biotechnologies ,” Kingston said. The synopsis of Prey reads: In the Nevada desert, an experiment has gone horribly wrong. A cloud of nanoparticles – micro-robots – has escaped from the laboratory. This cloud is self-sustaining and self-reproducing. It is intelligent and learns from experience. For all practical purposes, it is alive. It has been programmed as a predator. It is evolving swiftly, becoming more deadly with each passing hour. Every attempt to destroy it has failed. And we are the prey. As Britannica notes , although he was often criticised by the scientific community for being sensationalist, Crichton was known for the careful research that went into his work. For example, he meticulously studied the science underlying the premise of Jurassic Park . “Crichton continued to postulate on the effects of scientific advancements in works of science fiction such as Prey (2002), about nanotechnology; Next (2005), in which he returned to the blurry ethical boundaries of genetic engineering; and the 2005 thriller State of Fear , his polemical take on global warming,” Britannica notes. Crichton described his book Prey as follows: In the case of Prey , I was interested in knowing where three trends might be going – distributed programming, biotechnology, and nanotechnology. As a concept, nanotechnology dates back to a 1959 speech by Richard Feynman called There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom. Forty years later, the field is still very much in its infancy. But practical applications are starting to appear. Nanotechniques are already being used to make sunscreens, stain-resistant fabrics, and composite materials in cars. Soon they will be used to make computers and storage devices of extremely small size. And some of the long-anticipated “miracle” products have started to appear as well. In 2002, one company was manufacturing self-cleaning window glass; another made a nanocrystal wound dressing with antibiotic and anti-inflammatory properties. Prey: In His Own Words In 2002, Michael Crichton wrote an article ‘ Could Tiny Machines Rule the World ’ for Parade magazine that coincided with the release of his novel, Prey .  In the following excerpt, Crichton speculates about how nanotechnology could change our world.  We were unable to find a copy of the original article published by Parade on 24 November 2002, however, there is an extract published on the Michael Crichton website and also by The Fountain magazine, a publication controlled by the Gülen or Hizmet movement . Crichton says: “These organisms [self-reproducing tiny computers] will be created by nanotechnology, perhaps the most radical technology in human history: the quest to build man-made machines of extremely small size, on the order of 100 nanometres, or 100/billionths of a meter. Such machines would be 1,000 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair. Experts predict that these tiny machines will provide everything from miniaturised computer components to new medical treatments to new military weapons. In the 21st century, they will change our world totally.” Nanotechnology , The Fountain, 1 July 2003 Two days after his article was published in Parade , Crichton was interviewed by Charlie Rose. “I’m quite worried about the whole area of self-reproducing technologies – which is already biotechnology … [With genetic engineering] conceivably, just conceivably, if there was some kind of a virus that interfered with the photosynthesis, in enough plants … everything’s gone. The biosphere is essentially wiped out,” he warned. Michael Crichton interview on Charlie Rose about ‘Prey’, 26 November 2002, (32 mins) If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it and read the transcript on Charlie Rose’s website HERE . What Crichton was referring to is self-replicating biosynthetic viruses that could infect plants and hijack the photosynthesis process, Kingston wrote. “Please see  THIS 2022 report  on self-replicating biosynthetic pathogens being bred into plants to hijack the photosynthesis process.” Lettuce Virus X In 2008, Springer Link published an article about a virus infecting lettuce in Tehran province in Iran. The article stated: Based on particle morphology, physicochemical properties and the complete genome sequence, this virus is a member of a new species in the genus Potexvirus, for which the name lettuce virus X (LeVX) is proposed. Biological assays using an infectious cDNA clone and a wild-type isolate of LeVX revealed that the virus, despite reaching high concentrations in all lettuce cultivars tested, does not cause symptoms in lettuce. Dizadji, A., Koohi-Habibi, M., Izadpanah, K. et al. Characterisation of lettuce virus X, a new potexvirus infecting lettuce in Iran. Arch Virol 153, 1867–1875 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-008-0191-x For 180 euros, LeVX virus inoculum – any part of the pathogen that can initiate infection – can be purchased from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (“DSMZ”). “There are NO known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for [LeVX],” DSMZ states . DSMZ claims to be the world’s most diverse collection of biological resources – bacteria, archaea, protists, yeasts, fungi, bacteriophages, plant viruses, genomic bacterial DNA as well as human and animal cell lines – providing all users with the necessary legal certainty in the handling of their bioresources under the Nagoya Protocol , a 2010 supplementary agreement to the Convention on Biological Diversity signed at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Related:   Under the guise of biodiversity, they want to genetically manipulate all living things According to Wikipedia , DSMZ is a global supplier of microorganisms and cell cultures for university, non-university and industrial research with more than 10,000 customers in over 80 countries.  It is a member of several international organisations such as the European Culture Collections’ Organisation (“ECCO”), the World Federation for Culture Collections (“WFCC”) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (“GBIF”), which is a partner in the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data . Related: Global Public Private Partnership on The Exposé At the end of March, the Tennessee House of Representatives passed a bill dubbed the “ House Lettuce bill ” which defines any food that “contains a vaccine or vaccine material” as a drug under Tennessee law and the “food” would have to be labelled as a “vaccine.” “Lettuce is being weaponised with mRNA, not medicated,” Kingston said . Lettuce Virus X, or what we call  “mRNA Vaccine Lettuce”  includes mRNA viruses that hijack the chloroplasts of green plants to produce highly infectious pathogens instead of oxygen. Please see this report of the China National GeneBank Plant Databases and   Lettuce Virus X . [Note: The ‘Lettice Virus X’ article Kingston linked to is behind a paywall.  However, we were able to find Lettuce Virus X on the China National GeneBank so we can assume she is using the term, abbreviated to LeVX, as described above.] If you’d like to better understand  synthetic biology ,  Lettuce Virus X ,  mRNA gene editing technologies , and how you can protect you and your community, please subscribe to The Kingston Report [on Substack]. Virus X is Not What Anyone is Expecting , Karen Kingston, 15 April 2024

Words are spells 🪄

Words are spells 🪄

Massive Rallies Break Out in Japan Against WHO’s Pandemic Treaty. – ‘Don’t Underestimate the Japanese’

Massive Rallies Break Out in Japan Against WHO’s Pandemic Treaty. – ‘Don’t Underestimate the Japanese’

https://expose-news.com/2024/04/15/massive-rallies-break-out-in-japan-against-whos-pandemic-treaty-dont-underestimate-the-japanese/ “Let’s stop the third atomic bomb with our hands, in the hands of the Japanese people!” April 13, 2024, will be etched in the annals of modern Japanese history as tens of thousands of citizens across the nation came together in a series of pandemic rallies. The protests centered on the widespread opposition to the Pandemic Treaty, with escalating concerns over “infectious disease” and “public health” becoming potent tools for an  unprecedented push towards what is perceived by many as a totalitarian surveillance society. Source The following was written by Aussie 17 in Pharma Files. Massive Rallies Break Out in Japan Against WHO’s Pandemic Treaty. – ‘Don’t Underestimate the Japanese’ From the bustling streets of Ikebukuro to the gatherings at Higashi-Ikebukuro Central Park, the sheer scale of participation speaks volumes.  Organizers aimed for a monumental turnout of 100,000 protesters  to demand answers on crucial issues, such as the  stark increase in excess deaths and the lack of transparency on the adverse effects following vaccinations. The protest not just opposed potential mandatory vaccinations but also the perceived overreach of health authorities and their ties with global pharma, echoing a distressing sentiment of disenfranchisement among the populace. Demonstrators criticized the lack of explanations for a sharp increase in excess deaths and demanded accountability and clarity on vaccine-related casualties. Eminent speakers, including Professor Masayasu Inoue and modern history researcher Chikatsu Hayashi, provided compelling pre-demonstration speeches that laid bare the concerning dynamics between global health authorities and pharmaceutical agendas. Professor Inoue highlighted the concerning trend of our health being weaponized in what he termed as “ a third world war fought with information. ” He urged the public to  resist introducing genetic vaccines into their bodies , implicating a significant portion of WHO’s funding comes from pharmaceutical giants and private interests like the Bill Gates Foundation. This follows Japan’s Message to the world delivered by Prof Inoue a few days ago. Modern history researcher Prof Chikatsu Hayashi’s address was a rallying cry to resist the encroaching shadows of global totalitarianism, symbolically referring to the proactive stance against it as “ stopping the third atomic bomb with our hands. ” His poignant discourse highlighted a national movement poised against not only the Pandemic Treaty but also the underlying structures threatening Japan’s sovereignty and the well-being of its citizens. April 13 marked not just a protest against a treaty but a stand against a future where health becomes a lever for control and surveillance. The massive turnout signifies a critical moment in Japan’s civic engagement. It’s a call from its people for autonomy, transparency, and the reassessment of global health governance that resonates beyond its borders. Today, Japan stands at the forefront, questioning, challenging, and seeking change for a future where health policy respects national sovereignty and individual rights. Video Sources  here ,  here ,  here . Don’t Underestimate the Japanese! Translation of the X post below: “The chants from the front group were far away! There was no megaphone, so I barked in my normal voice! A huge number of friends! It is supposed to be the largest demonstration in Japanese history. Don’t mess with me, WHO! Don’t underestimate the Japanese!” Source: PharmaFiles by Aussie 17 – https://www.aussie17.com

PROJECT PEGASUS What really happened on April 8th

PROJECT PEGASUS What really happened on April 8th

Radio Wave Frequencies CAN INDEED Modify the weather

Radio Wave Frequencies CAN INDEED Modify the weather

The US Government says it is possible to modify the weather using electromagnetic radiation (radio waves).

Bill Copper on Israel's Role in the One World Government

Bill Copper on Israel's Role in the One World Government

“Israel was created as the instrument to bring about the battle of Armageddon..."

Western taxpayers are funding the global rollout of the controligarchs’ surveillance and control system

Western taxpayers are funding the global rollout of the controligarchs’ surveillance and control system

https://expose-news.com/2024/04/07/controligarchs-surveillance-and-control-system/ Dozens of national governments, along with the United Nations and Bill Gates, are collaborating on a global initiative called “50 in 5” to implement a “digital public infrastructure” within five years. This infrastructure includes central bank digital currencies, digital identification, comprehensive data systems and more, all aimed at functioning across national borders. It will enable total surveillance and control of people, with every transaction being tracked and controlled. The program is guided by the United Nations and various elitists, including Bill Gates and the Rockefellers, with funding from US and European taxpayers. UN and Bill Gates Behind “Digital Public Infrastructure” for Global Control By Alex Newman as published by Frontline News Dozens of national governments are joining with the United Nations and billionaire population-control fanatic Bill Gates on a global program to impose “digital public infrastructure” (“DPI”) on their citizens within five years. This “DPI” includes central bank digital currencies (“CBDCs”), digital identification (“digital ID”), comprehensive data systems and more, all functional across national borders. The new scheme, unveiled late last year and moving ahead rapidly, is known as “ 50 in 5 ” because 50 governments expect to have the Orwellian “digital infrastructure” of tyranny in place within five years. Almost a dozen governments, including numerous corrupt kleptocracies and socialist regimes, have volunteered their populations to serve as “First Mover” countries so far. However, the UN’s assumption is that every government will eventually impose this on every person on Earth. This is clearly expressed throughout its announcements. “All countries, regardless of income level, geography, or where they are in their digital transformation journey, can benefit from being a part of 50-in-5,” the UN agency behind the scheme declared. “Joining the campaign helps ensure countries don’t have to tackle DPI implementation alone or start from scratch.” Led by the UN Development Programme (“UNDP”), the new “digital infrastructure” is being framed as a tool to accelerate the imposition of the   highly controversial UN’s 2030 Agenda “Sustainable Development Goals” (“SDGs”), referred to in 2015 by key UN leaders as the “Master Plan for Humanity.” The SDGs, as they are known, call for global wealth redistribution and drastically more government power over people’s lives at all levels. The mass-murdering regime ruling China boasted of playing a “crucial role” in developing the plan.    Gates, who had a troubling relationship with convicted child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, celebrated the role of these technologies in imposing the UN SDGs on humanity. “The G20 reached a groundbreaking consensus on the role of digital public infrastructure as a critical accelerator of the Sustainable Development Goals,”  he said  on Twitter. “I’m optimistic about the potential of DPI to support a safer, healthier, and more just world.”    The whole program is being guided by the UN and elitists including Gates and others such as the Rockefellers, longtime financiers of globalism, eugenics, and population-control schemes. Multiple front groups steered by such “controligarchs” were created for the purpose. But US and European taxpayers are being conscripted to foot much of the bill via UN agencies and international “development” banks.   If not stopped, critics say the new suite of “digital public goods” and “infrastructure” will create a technological panopticon allowing for total surveillance and control of all people everywhere. Indeed, as the 2030 Agenda makes clear, “no one will be left behind.” Once in full swing, literally every transaction would be tracked, monitored, and controlled. UN bureaucrats put a happy face on the program. “For UNDP, a DPI approach that combines people-centric governance is critical to ensure that this new infrastructure can accelerate the [2030 Agenda] SDGs,” argued Keyzom Ngodup Massally, head of digital programs at UNDP. “This country-led 50-in-5 campaign is a core part of how UNDP continues to support meaningful global digital cooperation and strengthens local ecosystems to design and implement rights-based DPI.”   Already, virtually all national governments and central banks around the world are working on central bank digital currencies (“CBDCs”), according to the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland which is helping to guide and coordinate the rolling out of such currencies worldwide. As cash is sidelined and then disappears, CBDCs will create a permanent record of all transactions. Perhaps even more troubling, the digital currencies will also be programmable, leading experts and officials say. That will allow governments an unprecedented degree of control over the economy and individual decisions of consumers. In fact, the Biden White House has even called for CBDCs to advance “racial equity” and “environmental priorities.” Leading luminaries have called for them to track individual carbon footprints, too.   Along with CBDCs, governments around the world are rolling out digital IDs to go with them. The Australian Senate just voted to approve such a system last week. Multiple American state governments, including some controlled entirely by Republicans, are pursuing similar schemes. And various organisations associated with Gates, the Rockefeller dynasty, and the UN have been promoting such IDs for years, including through groups such as ID2020. Ultimately, the digital IDs and CBDCs will become inseparable. The  Financial Times  discussed the relationship between all the different systems in the digital infrastructure system in a 2021 piece headlined ‘ Why CBDCs Will Likely Be ID-based ’. It reveals how CBDCs and digital IDs can (and will) be used together to ultimately control people.   “What CBDC research and experimentation appears to be showing is that it will be nigh on impossible to issue such currencies outside of a comprehensive national digital ID management system,” wrote the Financial Times ’ Izabella Kaminska. “Meaning: CBDCs will likely be tied to personal accounts that include personal data, credit history and other forms of relevant information.” Eventually, healthcare will become intertwined with all of it, as CCP-backed World Health Organisation (“WHO”) boss (and former ethno-Marxist terrorist leader) Tedros Ghebreyesus  explained . “The covid-19 pandemic highlighted the value of digital health solutions in facilitating access to health services,” he declared before touting covid “vaccine passports” imposed by the European Union (“EU”). The WHO is now using the EU’s system to design a similar regime for all of humanity. Top globalists have hinted at where this is all going. “The trick is to build public digital infrastructure, that is interoperable, open to all and trusted. Let me give you one example that is reality today,” said EU “President” Ursula von der Leyen at the G20 summit in September. “Many of you are familiar with the covid-19 digital certificate. The EU developed it for itself. The model was so functional and so trusted that 51 countries on 4 continents adopted it for free.” A social credit score whereby each person receives a rank based on his or her compliance with technocrats’ demands is essentially inevitable under this regime as well, critics say. “Advocates are adamant that DPI is essential for participation in markets and society – just like we saw with vaccine passports – only on a much broader scope,”  explained   The Sociable editor Tim Hinchliffe, one of the first to sound the alarm. The potential for control, he continued, is almost endless. “If successful, DPI will give governments and corporations the power to implement systems of social credit that can determine where and how you can travel, what you are allowed to consume, and how you will be able to transact with your programmable money,” added Hinchliffe. Of course, this sort of system already exists in Communist China, something  The New American  has been  warning about for almost a decade . The Chinese Communist Party (“CCP”) serves as a “role model,” according to World Economic Forum (“WEF”) boss and Great Reset frontman Klaus Schwab and countless other globalists. And so, it is only a matter of time before such a regime is eventually unveiled in the West without massive opposition. Tracking children is at the top of the priority list, according to the WEF, as the data gathered is used to make decisions for people. “Fundamentally, a digital public infrastructure is about enabling data to flow seamlessly across sectors and systems, thereby enabling data-driven decision-making and policies,” the globalist organisation  says in a piece  about tracking children with DPI. The “Digital Public Infrastructure” will also fuel increasing restrictions on everyday life, including on movement amid the emergence of 15-minute cities. It will be used to impose all sorts of mandates, including “lockdown” policies under pretexts ranging from alleged “public health” emergencies to supposed man-made “climate change,” opponents are warning, citing statements by the peddlers of these systems.     But it gets weirder. At the end of what Schwab describes as the “Fourth Industrial Revolution,” there will be a “fusion of our digital, our physical, and our biological identities,” the German technocrat has said on multiple occasions. The full implications of that vision have not been worked out, but Schwab himself frequently promotes microchips to be implanted inside of human brains, among other transhumanist schemes .     The “50 in 5” campaign for DPI officially launched late last year in New York. It aims to “radically shorten” the length of time that it would take to digitise everything from identification to currency. That will happen through collaboration between the UN and governments as they share technology to eventually create an interoperable system in at least 50 countries by 2028. The whole world is expected to follow suit.   In addition to the UNDP, the Gates Foundation and the governments that have already signed up, a wide array of AstroTurf groups and UN agencies is also involved – many of them funded by governments as well as profiteers such as Gates and his technocratic allies. These include UNICEF, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Centre for Digital Public Infrastructure and the Digital Public Goods Alliance. The first governments to jump on the bandwagon – most with promises of “free” money extracted from Western taxpayers – include Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Moldova, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka and Togo. A handful of wealthier governments, including those in Norway and Singapore, have also signed on. “These countries serve as beacons of progress and inspiration for countries to build their own digital foundations and improve their economies and the well-being of people,” claimed the UNDP in  a press release  announcing the first 11 governments to participate in imposing these digital surveillance and control tools on their populations. By bringing 50 governments into the program, the UN is hoping each one can focus on one area or element of the “DPI” scheme. Then, each government will share what it learned with other governments, so the digital surveillance and control architecture can be imposed faster and in a way that transcends national borders. Sierra Leonean Minister of Communication, Technology, and Innovation Salima Monorma Bah called on all governments to sign on. “Sierra Leone is excited to be part of 50-in-5 and urges everyone else to join the campaign – the next five years are the window of opportunity to speed up safe and inclusive DPI implementation together and thereby accelerate positive outcomes for people globally,” Bah said.   Even as totalitarian technocrats rush ahead with these technologies, opposition is growing. In Florida, for example, a new law has officially banned CBDCs. Numerous other states are pursuing similar measures. After the devastating lies and tyranny that underpinned the covid “pandemic” were exposed, billions of people around the world are unlikely to ever have their trust in institutions restored, with most Americans now saying the media is an “enemy.”   About the Author Alex Newman  is an award-winning international journalist, educator, author, and consultant who co-wrote the book ‘ Crimes of the Educators: How Utopians Are Using Government Schools to Destroy America’s Children ’. He writes for diverse publications in the United States and abroad.  He is a senior editor for The New American .

‘The Metropolitan Police Finally Admit They Know What’s Going On’ and ‘It’s All Being Suppressed.’

‘The Metropolitan Police Finally Admit They Know What’s Going On’ and ‘It’s All Being Suppressed.’

https://expose-news.com/2024/04/15/the-metropolitan-police-finally-admit-they-know-whats-going-on-and-its-all-being-suppressed/ Have The Metropolitan Police finally admitted they know what’s going on out there? asks former police officer Mark Sexton who later tweeted on the X platform “The Metropolitan Police the biggest police force in the U.K., admit they know there are issues out there re the vaccines and it’s all being suppressed.” Mark Sexton came to this conclusion following his recent call to the Metropolitan police crime desk/victim focus team where he asked for an update on crime number 01/62447/24. This was the crime number he was issued following his criminal complaint at Acton police station, London on Friday 8th of March 2024 for allegations against Sir Graham Brady MP, Dame June Raine, The MHRA, Pfizer and the U.K Government, for misconduct in public office, misfeasance in public office, gross negligent manslaughter, corporate manslaughter and fraud by false representation. Dr Mike Yeadon had contributed to the complaint and had written a supporting letter at at this time ( Our report here . ). Later in the month of March, Mark emailed the MI5 office regarding “serious concerns and that we were being subjected to terrorism.” and the very next day received a call back from an officer who was reminded of the Terrorism Act and why Mark had concluded that this was what had occured in the UK. He said at this time: ‘All evidence clearly points to a preplanned, well funded attack, not just in the UK but around the world against the people. This is with the knowledge, and forethought of governments, civil servants, regulators and the media and we can prove that.” Mark asked: “ How does the anti terrorism organisation and MI5 plan to deal with this information because it is a clear act of terrorism? “ These criminals need to be arrested.. …’ (Our report on this update can be read here ) New Update “It’s clear they know and allow it to continue.” Mark has said and continues: “MI5 and The Anti Terrorism Unit know also and they are ignoring all correspondence and refuse to engage any further.A complaint was made to The Met, acknowledged and yet again I’m being ignored despite their promises to contact me within 48 hours. The Metropolitan Police are clearly complicit in these heinous crimes, they’ve been given every opportunity to act and protect the public from harm, injury and death.How on earth can the British police knowingly turn a blind eye and watch its people die and suffer?It is absolutely right and in the public interest for me to share this. To the Constable on the call, I’m sorry, I know I gave my word not to release this and I’ve broken my promise but I was left with no choice. Many lives have already been lost and more are at risk, there has to be accountability and remedy for the millions of victims. To the British public, let it be known that all Chief Officers and Constables of all rank know what’s going on, they follow unlawful orders by being told to do nothing and refuse to help and support us, the public, the very people who pay them.In the absence of a functioning, caring, legitimate or lawful policing system we have every right, in law, to protect ourselves, our families and our property.” Mark Calls The Met Mark has recorded his most recent conversation with the Metropolitan Police, which he says he had to edit to remove all personal and private information. You can listen to this below. Lawyers of Light The Lawyers of Light group have spoken to Mark Sexton about his visit to the police prior to this call and the issue of misconduct in public office. Here are their thoughts and they say they would welcome other lawyers adding to this. “ It is well known and provable that only a temporary authorisation for supply of Pfizer’s injectable had been granted at roll out in the UK, not a full marketing authorisation. As such the injectable was not even legally classed as a prescription only medicine . It is also now known from the SA Pfizer contract that the contract clearly stated that the efficacy and side effects of the injectable were unknown. A prudent or reasonable man would have told the public of the temporary authorisation, what it actually meant legally, and the lack of safety and efficacy claims in the contract for supply, that had been signed by the UK G ovt. Public officers are held to a higher standard than the ordinary prudent reasonable man. Failure to reveal the above led to the injury of and deaths of people taking the injectable. It clearly isn’t safe and as the contract stated, the safety profile was unknown, and therefore could only come to light after people had taken it. This is what is known as a massive gamble with people’s lives. Misconduct in a public office may involve a positive act or an omission in circumstances where action is required. In Dytham (1979) QB 722, for example, a police officer was held to have been correctly convicted when he made no move to intervene during a disturbance in which a man was kicked to death. ( https://t.me/lawyersoflight/13715 ) See definition of misconduct in public office below: Lawyers of Light assert “ We think it’s that simple. We would be pleased to hear from other lawyers on this issue.” We Must Protect Each Other and Lawfully Take Back our Country From These Criminals. However, Mark concluded that “ It’s never been more clear, nobody is coming to save us, not the police, nor the military or the judiciary. It’s up to us, the people, to come together as one, we must protect each other and lawfully take back our country from these criminals.We must do this for all of our children, to safeguard them and guarantee they have a happy, prosperous and safe future and their freedom is of paramount importance.”

bottom of page