Search Results

https://expose-news.com/2025/01/18/ecb-is-looking-forward-to-2025/ Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank (“ECB”), is expecting European legislation for the digital euro. According to her, the European Commission will propose legislation for establishing a digital euro in the near future. “We are in the preparation phase and we are expecting European legislation,” she said in her New Year’s message. On the first day of the new year, Lagarde posted a video message announcing that the development of the European Union’s central bank digital currency (“CBDC”) – the digital euro – was in phase 2 and the ECB is “expecting legislation.” “Another significant development on the horizon is our digital euro. We are in the preparation phase and we are expecting European legislation,” she said. “Once that is done, we will decide whether we move forward with developing a digital form of cash.” Source: Christine Lagarde on Twitter , 1 January 2025 Lagarde wished those who watched her video a “very, very great start to 2025.” Well, the ECB’s aspirations, as she described them, begin the year on a very, very bad note and in wishing Europeans well she is speaking with a forked tongue.  Take for example the two blatant lies Lagarde told in her message.  Firstly, they would not be legislating for a digital euro if they were not intending to “move forward” with the agenda.  So, it’s not a case of deciding “whether” to move forward but rather the decision has already been made. Secondly, CBDCs are not a “digital form of cash.”  They are tokens which can be programmed to be used only for certain items or services and to expire – much like a gift voucher system which retailers use.  Vouchers are for a specific amount to be used on specific items or in specific retailers and expire within a specified time; the retailer’s rules and conditions apply.  It is because of the programmable and centralised nature of CBDCs that they will be used to control who can buy or sell what, when and where; the central bank’s rules and conditions will apply. Do You Trust Christine Lagarde?  If So, You Shouldn’t Here are some other reasons why you should not trust Christine Lagarde and, by extension, the ECB that has chosen to employ her. Convicted Criminal Christine Lagarde , the former French finance minister and the head of the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”) (2011-2019), was convicted of criminal charges on 19 December 2016, for her role in a €400 million ($429 million; £340 million) government payout to businessman Bernard Tapie. The court found her guilty of negligence for failing to challenge the state arbitration payout, which was given to a friend of former French President Nicolas Sarkozy. Despite the conviction, Lagarde was not given any sentence and will not face any punishment. The Court of Justice of the Republic, a special tribunal for ministers, could have sentenced her to up to one year in prison and a €13,000 fine. However, the ruling did not impose any penalties on her. Read more: Christine Lagarde convicted: IMF head found guilty of criminal charges over massive government payout , Independent, 19 December 2016 Eugenicist and Depopulationist Christine Lagarde, the then Director of the IMF, said “old people live too long” and this is a “risk for the global economy.” Attempting to debunk the statement, in 2021 Chequeado, a “fact-checker” for Facebook in Argentina, claimed : – “There are no written or audiovisual records that the statements attributed to the former IMF director are hers.”  Well, that’s easily sorted out by censoring and cleansing the internet of any incriminating evidence. – “Furthermore, the European Central Bank assured that Lagarde had not said that phrase.”  Yes, well they would say that. – “Part of the phrase attributed to the President of the European Central Bank (ECB) comes from a 2012 report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in whose presentation Lagarde was not present … In 2012, the IMF published the ‘ Report on Global Financial Stability (GFSR) ’, in which presentation Lagarde was not present. In that document, the IMF warned – in Chapter 4 – about the financial impact of longevity risk. ‘The financial implications of people living longer than expected (the so-called longevity risk) are very large’, the document says.” This is an interesting admission because according to the IMF’s report “longevity risk” is “the risk that actual life spans of individuals or whole populations will exceed expectations.” (See ‘Chapter 4: The Financial Impact of Longevity Risk’, page 3 of chapter 4 or, if you down the PDF of the report, page 137 of the PDF document.) Contrary to the claims of Facebook’s “fact-checker,” Lagarde’s negative sentiments towards the elderly were confirmed in a 2018 memo from “the Coalition.” The leaked memo, discovered in the waste basket of a high-ranking staffer in the European Commission, was sent to heads of state and finance ministers, urging them to address the issue of longevity as a risk to the global economy.  Heads of state that the memo was addressed to were “Angela, Teresa, Emmanuel …” presumably referring to Germany’s Angela Merkel , UK’s Theresa May and France’s Emmanuel Macron . The memo, as published by Monthly Review , stated: Here at the Coalition we were impressed by Christine’s bravery, saying publicly that old people “live too long” and those in charge of the global economy must do something about it, urgently. Recently, a photo of her, with potentially incendiary language from her speeches, has gone viral, without raising any resistance. Since older people do vote more reliably, her implication that old people are “superfluous” and “expensive” would seem troubling for the stability of political elites. But since then, Christine has kept her job while continually stressing the same themes, so it’s clear that the Americans who dominate the International Monetary Fund feel it’s safe to sow doubt on the need for knee-jerk protection of old people’s interests. This they have demonstrated vividly many times since the 2016 election. At Davos everyone was repeating the message. The Coalition welcomes this new moment for advancing our sensible coordinated agenda toward the superannuated, increasingly justified as all our budgets are swallowed up by entitlements, our streets and ICUs are clogged with old people, medical expenses for the senile are soaring, and adult children are burdened with costs and guilt. The ‘Christine Lagarde Memo’: FOR YOUR EYES ONLY, from ‘the Coalition ‘ , Monthly Review, 9 October 2018 It is worthwhile reading the entire memo that was purportedly leaked.  Although there is no way of validating its authenticity, it is a real eye-opener if you want to understand the possible reasons for the assault on people who have outlived “expectations.” Rather than basing decisions on someone’s age, might we suggest that it is people such as Lagarde and “the Coalition” that are the cause of longevity risk, that it is they who are clogging up our streets and are a burden to society, and that they have perhaps lived longer than “expectations”? Further reading: Digital euro legislation planned for 2023. Lagarde confirms wholesale CBDC considered , Ledger Insights, 27 September 2022 Christine Lagarde: Digital euro – a common European project , BIS, 8 November 2022 and Digital euro: a common European project , European Central Bank, 7 November 2022 European Commission to soon propose legislation on a digital Euro , AMB Crypto, 8 November 2022 Digital Euro at Least 2 Years Away, ECB’s Lagarde Says , Coin Desk, 26 September 2023 Eurosystem proceeds to next phase of digital euro project , European Central Bank, 18 October 2023 Christine Lagarde on European competitiveness, US tariffs, and creating a digital euro , Atlantic Council, 23 October 2024

Los Angeles wildfires set to be costliest disaster in US history.

He says Trump has decided to “lift all the remaining restrictions” on US munitions, allowing Israel to resume the war with “tremendous force.”

https://expose-news.com/2025/01/15/climate-and-nature-bill-is-the-uns-agenda-2030/ Featured image: George Orwell to be honoured on new £2 coin by Royal Mint. Source: The Guardian On yesterday’s episode of Trending , Gareth Icke and Richard Willet dive into the UK Climate and Nature (“CAN”) Bill, currently sneaking its way through Parliament without scrutiny. Very much like the WHO Pandemic Treaty, the CAN Bill would give unelected bodies sweeping powers to take over land, prevent travel, and control meat consumption, among other draconian powers, in the event of a “climate emergency.” Icke and Willet also discussed the Los Angeles wildfires and the possible connection to the LA Smart City 2028 agenda, the BBC’s climate change propaganda, including the vilification of family pets as a cause for climate change, and the UK’s release of a new two pound coin to commemorate the life of 1984 author George Orwell. The coin features the Big Brother eye. We Are Ickonic: Trending | Ep7 | What Is The Climate & Nature (CAN) Bill? 14 January 2024 (30 mins) In the following, we focus on Trending ’s discussion of the CAN Bill. The Climate and Nature (“CAN”) Bill has largely gone under the radar. It was reintroduced in the UK House of Commons by Liberal Democrat MP Roz Savage on 16 October 2024 and has its second reading scheduled in 9 days, on 24 January. “The reason it’s gone under the radar is they don’t want any scrutiny of it. The reason they don’t want scrutiny of it is because it ain’t going to be very good for us,” Icke said. The Bill is a rebadged version of the UN Agenda 2030. The Bill includes provisions for forced rewilding, which is another way of saying that the government will grant itself powers to seize land from farmers and others if they do not meet sustainable goals. It also includes retrofitting of homes, which would require homeowners to make changes such as installing insulation, heat pumps or solar panels at their own expense. Of course, the rules which allow the government to grab land and property or require homeowners to make changes to their homes are made by a select few using arbitrary arguments and can change at a whim. The Bill aims to ban fossil fuels, which would lead to pressure on the energy supply and drive up prices, making energy unaffordable for some people. The government would have control over various aspects of people’s lives, including energy use, food consumption, travel and what can be fitted or not fitted in their homes, with smart meters playing a role. “They’ll be able to order you not to travel, not to leave certain areas, not to fly …  they’ll be able to control food consumption what you’re allowed to [eat] … What will also tie into this is what you say,” Icke said. “Another thing that’s on there is energy use, so they can control how much energy you use.” “It should also be pointed out,” said Willet, “This will all be monitored on your digital ID system.  So all of this data will be collated on a digital ID system.” Usually, a bill has two or three sponsors.  The CAN Bill has over 200 sponsors in Parliament, indicating strong support for it to pass in Parliament.  The acronym “CAN” could easily be a psychological trick, so the public views the Bill with a positive connotation, even though in reality it is sinister. The justification for the CAN Bill is to address climate change, but the reality is it gives the government power to declare emergencies, and then implement policies and control people’s behaviour in response to that emergency without public input. Section 2 of the Bill proves the undefined, arbitrary and changeable nature of the yardsticks that the appointed enforcers will have at their disposal to invoke their powers: (1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the passing of this Act, publish and lay before Parliament a strategy (“the strategy”) to achieve the objectives [of reducing its overall contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions to net zero and halting and reversing its overall contribution to the degradation and loss of nature in the United Kingdom and overseas]. (3) The strategy must include measures that … will achieve the objectives … by – (a) limiting the United Kingdom’s total emissions of carbon dioxide to no more than its proportionate share of the remaining global carbon budget; (c) reducing the United Kingdom’s emissions of greenhouse gases other than carbon dioxide at rates consistent with a proportionate United Kingdom contribution to limiting global heating to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Climate and Nature Bill (As Introduced), Zero Hour Neither the objectives nor 3(a) nor 3(c) can ever be specific, measurable or realistic, it is simply not possible even if anthropogenic climate change were real – it is all made-up nonsense, the Bill’s premise, the strategy it is attempting to legislate and any targets that are spun out from it.  And there are 200 supporters for this Bill?! Wikipedia notes : “At the time of Roz Savage’s announcement that she will reintroduce the CAN Bill on 10 October 2024, 182 MPs (from 11 political parties), 64 peers, 371 local authorities, and the London Assembly were backing the Bill.” Every single one of them should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves. You can find a list of MPs who are supporting the horrendous Climate and Nature Bill HERE and all other supporters of it HERE .

Journalist & Researcher Jon Fleetwood joins Maria Zeee to discuss the evidence for the planned launch of "bird flu," detailing how the industry of biomedical terrorism plans to continue their war on humanity. Listeners may be surprised to learn who some of the key players are.

0:00  - MUST SEE!!! 1:18  - CIA, Silicon Valley & Las Vegas 3:19  - Brain control with Wireless Technology 4:55  - Brain Control with LIGHT 6:34  - Benefits of Infrared Light 08:06  - Sunlight 09:22  - Photosynthesis 10:52  - Methanol Blue 12:44  - Our Bodies Create Light 16:06  - The Medical Industry 17:27  - Testosterone & Blue Light

https://expose-news.com/2025/01/14/how-to-shield-your-wealth/?jetpack_skip_subscription_popup The Great Taking, a plan by the global elite to strip humanity of assets and consolidate power, is imminent, according to David Webb, a former Wall Street insider and hedge fund manager. The plan involves the erosion of property rights and the weaponisation of debt, allowing financial institutions to seize securities, bank deposits, real estate and personal property financed by debt. To protect yourself, Webb advises eliminating debt, owning tangible assets like physical gold or unencumbered property, moving money out of traditional banking systems and educating yourself on the mechanisms of The Great Taking. The Great Taking of 2025: How to Shield Your Wealth from the Global Elite’s Ultimate Heist By Helena Carey as published by Gazette Teller on 9 January 2025 The clock is ticking. The masterminds behind global financial control are poised to unleash the most audacious heist in human history: The Great Taking. This isn’t a mere economic crisis; it’s a methodical and calculated plan to strip humanity of all assets and consolidate power into the hands of a few unseen architects of the financial world. David Webb, a former Wall Street insider and hedge fund manager, has exposed this sinister plot in his groundbreaking book, ‘ The Great Taking ’. Webb details the machinations of central bankers and their accomplices who, for over five decades, have meticulously prepared the legal framework to seize securities, bank deposits, real estate and even personal property financed by debt. The chilling truth is that this plan is no accident—it is designed for domination. The Mechanics of the Ultimate Heist At the core of The Great Taking lies the erosion of property rights and the weaponisation of debt. What once offered financial security – stocks, bonds, real estate – is now a trap. With the transition from physical paper certificates to digital ownership, control of assets has been systematically siphoned away from people and centralised in the hands of financial institutions.   Gone are the days when stockholders had tangible proof of ownership. Today, the illusion of control is maintained while financial giants use practices like rehypothecation to claim and reuse your assets. This sleight of hand has created a precarious house of cards where your supposed ownership is nothing more than a mirage. During the 2008 financial crisis, this agenda became blatantly clear. A small brokerage firm’s bankruptcy in Florida set the precedent for sweeping up client assets to satisfy creditor claims. Lehman Brothers’ collapse solidified this, empowering financial institutions like JPMorgan, BlackRock and Goldman Sachs to claim ownership of your investments during insolvencies. Your hard-earned securities are nothing more than collateral for their gambles. The Debt Trap: How They Plan to Take Everything Webb warns that debt is the weapon of choice in this war. Decades of engineered consumer debt dependency have reached a boiling point. Americans, buried under mountains of loans and mortgages, are now standing on the edge of a financial abyss. When the next crisis hits – and it’s not a question of  if  but  when – this tidal wave of insolvencies will allow the financial elite to seize not just securities but all debt-financed assets. Your home, your car, your business – everything you thought you owned could vanish overnight. The legal groundwork is already in place. And the trap has been meticulously constructed: Central banks, with their private control of money creation, have manipulated economic booms and busts for decades, ensuring that every downturn tightens their grip on power. Consumer debt is at an all-time high, leaving the masses vulnerable and unable to defend their assets. The illusion of ownership has been perpetuated by a media complicit in keeping you blind to the real stakes. When the music stops, only the most senior creditors – those closest to the central banking apparatus – will have a seat. Everyone else will be left scrambling, their assets confiscated and their financial independence obliterated. The Endgame: Total Control and Subjugation This is not just about money; it’s about total domination. The architects of The Great Taking have embedded their control into every facet of society – governments, intelligence agencies, the military and the media. Webb’s research exposes how these hidden forces operate with surgical precision, executing a plan that spans decades. Their control is invisible but absolute. By weaponising debt, they have transformed the global economy into a battlefield where the average citizen is left defenceless. Make no mistake: this is a hybrid war against humanity. The legal structures are already operational, and the fuse is lit. All that remains is the trigger – a crisis that will plunge millions into insolvency, enabling the seizure of assets on a scale never before seen. The Illusion of Fiat Currency and Bank Deposits If you think your money is safe in a bank, think again. Fiat currency, as Webb reveals, is nothing more than an unbacked liability of bankrupt governments. Once deposited, your money becomes the property of the bank, leaving you with nothing but an unsecured “I owe you” (“IOU”). In the coming collapse, these IOUs will be worthless. Banks, controlled by the very forces orchestrating this scheme, will turn on their customers. Your savings, pensions and retirement accounts are all at risk. The legal plumbing is in place for banks to seize deposits during the next crisis, leaving you with nothing. How to Protect Yourself While the scope of The Great Taking is overwhelming, there are ways to fight back. The key is to become a hard target: Eliminate Debt: Debt is their weapon, and every dollar you owe is leverage against you. Pay off your loans and free yourself from their control. Own Tangible Assets: Shift your wealth into assets that you can hold and control directly, like physical gold, silver or unencumbered property. Ditch the Banks: Move your money out of traditional banking systems and into alternatives that don’t tie you to unsecured liabilities. Educate Yourself: Knowledge is power. Read Webb’s book and other resources to fully understand the mechanisms of The Great Taking and how to counteract them. The Fight for Survival This is not a time for complacency. The Great Taking is not a far-off event – it’s imminent. The financial elite have spent decades perfecting their trap, and they are ready to spring it. When the next crisis hits, the unprepared will lose everything. Webb’s warning is clear: act now or be swept away. The coming collapse is by design, and only those who see through the lies and take decisive action will survive. Prepare yourself, protect your assets, and don’t fall victim to the greatest theft in human history. About the Author Helena Carey is a seasoned news author renowned for her engaging storytelling and insightful analysis. With a decade of journalism experience, she’s a trusted voice in the ever-evolving news landscape.

https://expose-news.com/2025/01/13/how-to-survive-the-great-taking/ “The Great Taking” is a plan by central bankers to confiscate all securities, bank deposits and debt-financed property, as revealed by former hedge fund manager David Webb. The plan involves exploiting the global debt accumulation super cycle, rehypothecation of assets, and the centralisation of control over financial institutions. To survive “The Great Taking”, Nick Giambruno suggests people should aim to be debt-free and own unencumbered assets within their direct control, avoiding fiat currency in bank accounts and unsecured liabilities. How To Survive “The Great Taking” in 2025 By  Nick Giambruno It’s a “scheme of central bankers to subjugate humanity by taking all securities, bank deposits, and property financed with debt.” David Webb, a former hedge fund manager, and Wall Street insider, has blown the lid off a diabolical plan more than 50 years in the making in a shocking new book.  He calls it ‘ The Great Taking ‘.  I consider it an urgent must-read (available for free  HERE ). Here’s the synopsis (emphasis mine): It is about the taking of collateral (all of it), the end game of the current globally synchronous debt accumulation super cycle. This scheme is being executed by long-planned, intelligent design, the audacity and scope of which is difficult for the mind to encompass. Included are all financial assets and bank deposits, all stocks and bonds; and hence, all underlying property of all public corporations, including all inventories, plant and equipment; land, mineral deposits, inventions and intellectual property. Privately owned personal and real property financed with any amount of debt will likewise be taken, as will the assets of privately owned businesses which have been financed with debt. If even partially successful, this will be the greatest conquest and subjugation in world history. Private, closely held control of ALL central banks, and hence of all money creation, has allowed a very few people to control all political parties and governments; the intelligence agencies and their myriad front organisations; the armed forces and the police; the major corporations and, of course, the media. These very few people are the prime movers. Their plans are executed over decades. Their control is opaque. To be clear, it is these very few people, who are hidden from you, who are behind this scheme to confiscate all assets, who are waging a hybrid war against humanity. Webb shows how the dark forces behind central banking have spent the last 50 years meticulously putting the legal structures in place worldwide to sever property rights for securities. Gone are the days of physical paper share certificates and bearer securities, where you had control and ownership of the asset. Today, your control and ownership have become increasingly distant as stocks, bonds and other investments have been centralised away from account holders and rehypothecated – a slimy practice where financial institutions reuse an account holder’s asset for their own purposes, creating multiple claims on the same asset. Contrary to what most brokerage account holders believe, they only have the appearance of ownership. If their broker goes bust, the stocks and bonds they think they own will be used to satisfy the other more senior creditors of their broker. Webb shows how, during the 2008 financial crisis, a small broker in Florida went bankrupt.  Instead of sending the clients’ securities to another broker, as had traditionally been the case, they were swept up by the bankruptcy receiver. But it’s not just some isolated small broker. The bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers set the case law precedent for secured creditors to take client assets in the case of insolvency. The most senior secured creditors are the most powerful financial institutions closest to the central banks – JP Morgan, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, etc. The net effect of The Great Taking will be the biggest centralisation of money and power in history as they take everyone’s securities during a future crisis.  Though it’s not just securities, they will also take ANY asset financed by debt – like real estate, cars and small businesses – as people become unable to service their debts. Webb provides all the details and proof in his book.  Here’s the bottom line. The most powerful people in the world have succeeded in subverting the property rights of securities and ensnaring most of the world with debt. The trap has been set, and the legal plumbing is in place. All that is needed is a big crisis that will cause a tidal wave of bankruptcies and the hidden forces behind the world’s central banks will be able to take everyone’s stocks, bonds and any property financed by debt. All the assets people think they own in brokerage accounts, bank accounts, pensions and other financial accounts could vanish overnight. Webb says, “There will be a game of musical chairs. When the music stops, you will not have a seat. It is designed to work that way.” The Coming Collapse Is by Design Webb makes a compelling case that the next financial crisis won’t be an accident; the global elite are making it happen to proceed with The Great Taking.  In short, it’s not plausible that such an intelligent, deliberate plan executed with persistence for more than 50 years could happen by accident. Further, the forces behind central banking and (fake) money creation undoubtedly understand the dynamics of the boom-bust cycle they create by expanding and contracting the money supply.  They know the Everything Bubble they created will lead to a massive bust. That’s when they will execute The Great Taking. Further, consumer debt is at record highs.  After many years of being encouraged to go deeply into debt, many Americans have reached their maximum debt saturation. They will be ripe for the picking.  As Webb explains: “Debt is not a real thing. It is an invention, a construct designed to take real things. The bottom line is that debt has for centuries had the function of dispossessing, of taking away property, capital and investments from someone.” What You Can Do About It? Nobody knows the future or how The Great Taking will play out. The best you can do is to make yourself a hard target and not be among the low-hanging fruit. You can do that by being debt-free and owning unencumbered assets within your direct control. You don’t want to own something that is simultaneously someone else’s liability. That’s because the legal structures are already in place to take it from you during the next crisis.  Crucially, this includes fiat currency in bank accounts. Remember, fiat currency is the unbacked liability of a bankrupt government.  Further, once you deposit currency into a bank, it is no longer yours. Technically and legally, it is the bank’s property, and what you own instead is an unsecured liability of the bank. As The Great Taking unfolds, you won’t want to be on the other end of unsecured liabilities or IOUs of any kind. I believe The Great Taking could happen sooner than most realise – and it won’t be pretty for many.  Most people have no idea how bad things could get – or how to prepare.  That’s why I’ve published a detailed guide called ‘ The Most Dangerous Economic Crisis in 100 Years: The Top 3 Strategies You Need Right Now’ .  Click here to download the free PDF. About the Author Nick Giambruno is a renowned speculator and international investor known for his expertise in identifying geopolitical and economic trends.  He specialises in finding lucrative investment opportunities in overlooked markets and advises on reducing political risks through international diversification. He is the founder of The Financial Underground , a platform dedicated to uncovering truths about money and markets. He frequently speaks at investment conferences worldwide and has been featured in various publications including The Economist , Forbes , Zero Hedge and MoneyWeek .

https://www.newstarget.com/2025-01-14-gabbard-betrays-civil-liberties-for-dni-confirmation.html Former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (R-HI) has surprisingly switched her stance on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which permits warrantless surveillance of Americans' communications and metadata. Her about-face is believed to be an effort to secure her confirmation as the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), a position she was nominated for by President-elect Donald Trump. Previously, Gabbard was known for her vocal opposition to Section 702, citing concerns over Fourth Amendment violations. She even introduced legislation to repeal the provision in 2020. Gabbard's sudden support for Section 702 is viewed with skepticism, especially given her own experience as a target of surveillance under the outgoing Biden administration. Critics argue that her new rhetoric is inconsistent with her past advocacy for civil liberties. Gabbard’s confirmation as DNI, contingent upon her support for Section 702, highlights the power dynamics and compromises required in Washington. Her transformation serves as a cautionary tale about the influence of political power on principles. Former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (R-HI), once a vocal critic of the Deep State and its overreach, has shockingly reversed her stance on one of the most controversial tools of the surveillance state: Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). This abrupt about-face, reportedly made to secure her confirmation as Director of National Intelligence (DNI), marks a stunning betrayal of the principles she once claimed to champion. Gabbard's newfound support for warrantless surveillance of Americans stands in stark contrast to her own experience as a target of the very system she now endorses – a system that placed her on a terrorist watchlist under the outgoing Biden administration. Gabbard's transformation from civil liberties advocate to Deep State enabler is a cautionary tale of how power can corrupt even the most outspoken critics. As a congresswoman for the Aloha State, she repeatedly voted against reauthorizing Section 702, a provision that allows intelligence agencies to conduct warrantless searches of Americans’ communications and metadata. She even introduced legislation to repeal the provision in 2020, citing its blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment. Her principled opposition earned her credibility among those who value privacy and constitutional rights. But now, as President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for DNI, Gabbard has abandoned her principles in exchange for political power. In a recent statement, she declared her support for Section 702, calling it "crucial" and claiming that reforms have addressed her previous concerns. "If confirmed as DNI, I will uphold Americans' Fourth Amendment rights while maintaining vital national security tools like Section 702 to ensure the safety and freedom of the American people," Gabbard said. This rhetoric rings hollow, however, given the reality of Section 702's abuse. The provision has long been a cornerstone of the surveillance state, enabling the FBI and other agencies to spy on Americans without a warrant. Despite Gabbard’s claims of reform, the program remains deeply flawed. Congress itself has exempted its members and staff from warrantless surveillance, leaving ordinary Americans vulnerable to the same abuses she once decried. From surveillance state critic to Deep State ally Gabbard's reversal is particularly galling given her personal experience with the surveillance state. Just last year, she revealed that the outgoing Biden administration had placed her on the Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) "Quiet Skies" program , a secretive initiative used to monitor potential domestic terrorists. Under the TSA initiative, she was subjected to invasive searches and surveillance simply for criticizing the Democratic administration's policies. "The Harris-Biden regime has now labeled me a domestic terror threat," Gabbard said in a video at the time. "Why? They see me as a threat to their power." (Related: Tulsi Gabbard: Criticizing Kamala Harris put me on "secret terrorist watchlist." ) Her placement on the watchlist sparked bipartisan outrage, with lawmakers like Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) condemning the targeting as politically motivated. Yet, despite this firsthand experience of government overreach, Gabbard has chosen to align herself with the same surveillance apparatus that once targeted her. The Senate Select Intelligence Committee has reportedly made Gabbard's support for Section 702 a condition of her confirmation. This quid pro quo reveals the extent to which the Deep State demands loyalty to its agenda. By capitulating to these demands, Gabbard has not only betrayed her principles but also the millions of Americans who trusted her to stand up to government overreach. Gabbard's confirmation as DNI would mark a troubling victory for the surveillance state. As DNI, she would be required to certify Section 702 annually, ensuring its continued use. Her willingness to do so, despite her past opposition, underscores the corrosive influence of power in Washington. Her journey from critic to collaborator is a stark reminder of the compromises demanded by the Deep State . By supporting Section 702, she has abandoned the fight for civil liberties and embraced the very system she once condemned. Watch former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard explaining why she endorses Donald Trump for president below, which paid off when Trump picked her as the DNI nominee. This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com . More related stories: Three powerful Dems sound major alarm bells over Comrade Kamala's plans to BUTCHER social media. Tulsi Gabbard endorses Donald Trump for president as former Dems reject the tyrannical, Marxist Left. Trump names Tulsi Gabbard to be the next Director of National Intelligence.

https://expose-news.com/2025/01/14/one-world-government-using-technocracy/ We have all become familiar with the term “conspiracy theory” over the last five years.  But what is less clear for some is what the “conspiracy” actually is. The “Conspiracy” refers to a movement among top intellectuals, industrialists, and globalists to create a single world government, which would threaten individual freedom and lives. This movement, also known as the New World Order, is driven by a philosophy called technocracy, which advocates for rule by experts, scientists or technicians, rather than democratic processes. Proponents of the New World Order, such as Zbigniew Brzezinski and Klaus Schwab, aim to create a more controlled society dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values, and potentially governed by autonomous AI systems. Is the current talking point about the USA annexing Canada part of the Conspiracy? Technocracy, Fear-Mongers, and the Conspiracy By Bert Olivier as published by Brownstone Institute on 8 January 2024 The term, “conspiracy theory” became part of common parlance during the “Covid era,” but although all of us know what it refers to – and who are supposed to be the “conspiracy theorists” in question, namely those people who saw through the “pandemic” scam and everything it entailed – the precise nature of the “conspiracy” is probably less clear. When I ask people what they understand by it, they usually answer in more or less vague terms. So, what is it?  In his book, ‘ HAARP: The Ultimate Weapon of the Conspiracy ’  (2003) – followed in 2006 by ‘ Weather Warfare ’ – Jerry Smith indicates the importance he attributes to the concept by capitalising it throughout. Smith relates it to what he regards as a weapon for warfare; to wit, the “High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP),” and uncovers what the powers behind this project would have preferred to remain undisclosed, for obvious reasons, once one is apprised of the reasons for its establishment by the “Conspiracy.” Here I do not wish to delve into the specifics of HAARP but merely focus on Smith’s illuminating insights as far as the “Conspiracy” is concerned. His answer to the question about its “what?” is scattered throughout the first of the two books mentioned earlier. Here are some excerpts (Smith, 2003, p. 22-24):   Some people believe that there is one over-arching conspiracy, a cadre of incredibly powerful people who want to rule the world. Most of us dismiss such people as paranoid kooks. Still, there is no denying that for over a hundred years a movement has been developing among the world’s top intellectuals, industrialists and “global villagers” to end war and solve societal problems (like overpopulation, trade imbalances and environmental degradation) through the creation of a single world government. Whether this globalist movement is a diabolic “conspiracy” of the evil few or a broad “consensus” of the well-intentioned many, in fact matters little. It is as real as AIDS and potentially just as deadly, at least to our individual freedom, if not our very lives … To grasp why Smith employs the term “deadly” with regard to the Conspiracy, one has to read the book, but here it is sufficient to point out that, if nations were to surrender their own sovereign right to deal with overpopulation, environmental problems and so on, as they see fit – even if this were to be done in cooperation with international agencies – a “one solution for all” system would mean that policies would be imposed on them which are not suitable, or acceptable, for their own needs. The idea of a “League of Nations” that was floated after World War I was but one embodiment of this movement. Today’s United Nations (UN) was built on the League of Nations concept. The UN was created primarily to end war – by ending nations. The logic is that if there are no nations, then there can be no wars between nations. This was clearly stated in the United Nations’ ‘World Constitution’ with these words: “The age of nations must end. The governments of the nations have decided to order their separate sovereignties into one government to which they will surrender their arms.” While 18th-century thinker Immanuel Kant, would have applauded the aim of terminating wars between nations, he would certainly have been less enamoured of the idea that sovereign nations would have to relinquish their sovereignty in favour of a wholesale assimilation into an encompassing world government. His reasons were clearly stated in the second of the ‘ Definitive Articles ’ formulated in his essay on ‘ Perpetual Peace :’ “The law of nations shall be founded on a federation of free states.” For Kant this is essential for lasting peace, insofar as such a federation, where states would be subject to federal laws, is comparable to a state with a republican constitution, which is governed according to laws that are external to the (often disorderly) will(s) of citizens themselves.  Unless such a federation of nations (as opposed to a “state” of nations, where all member states would comprise only one “nation of states”) were to be established, the rights of every member state would not   be guaranteed, parallel to the way citizens’ rights are guaranteed in a republican state. In other words, every member state, together with its citizens, would be at the mercy of what the overall “world government” decides. Particularly the words (in the excerpt, above), “to order their separate sovereignties into one government to which they will surrender their arms,” sound outright ominous. The New World Order (NWO) is but one name given to this push to create a true world government. Many supporters of the NWO espouse a philosophy called technocracy, which is rule by experts, scientists or technicians. It is not democratic in any sense by which Americans understand the term. One very famous advocate of the New World Order is Zbigniew Brzezinski. He was a National Security Advisor to Jimmy Carter and other presidents. He called his version of technocracy “technetronics.” In his book, ‘ Between Two Ages ’, Brzezinski wrote: “The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.” This “technetronic” union of nations would call for the de-sovereignisation of all existing countries. This new ordering would reduce the United States of America to a mere regional government – perhaps the “United States of North America.” [See end note] The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is widely seen as one stepping stone to the NWO. Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was quoted by the  Los Angeles Times Syndicate  in 1993 as saying: “NAFTA represents the single most creative step towards a New World Order.” The Common Market in Europe and the European Union (EU) are similarly seen as bridges to an eventual United States of Europe, which in turn would be just another region of the United Nations’ global state (or “global plantation” as some detractors have called it). It is an understatement to claim that technocracy is “not democratic in any sense by which Americans [or anyone else; B.O.] understand the term.” Strictly speaking, technocracy would go further than merely using technical means to govern people, such as surveillance equipment, water cannons or armoured cars for crowd control, or tasers to neutralise resistance; in the true sense of the word technocracy, technical devices, such as AI-robots, would be the means of governance.  Even this does not go far enough, because it suggests that some other agents, presumably human, would be the true power behind the robots, whereas technocracy in the extreme or “pure” sense would entail the autonomous power to rule of the robots themselves, such as the machines in James Cameron’s ‘ Terminator ’ films, or the Cylons in  Ronald D. Moore ’s ‘ Battlestar Galactica’ . I need not point out that the valorisation of AI by members of the globalist cabal puts them squarely in the company of those who would welcome technocracy; in what capacity it is difficult to say. Would they go as far as to surrender human oversight and control to the machines? Sometimes Noah Juval Harari – Klaus Schwab’s advisor – seems to suggest that they would .  Seen in this light, it makes complete sense that Brzezinski is quoted as saying that the “technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society,” which “would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.” This is possibly the most important reason for ordinary people to resist the Conspiracy as characterised by Smith. Why? His use of the term “unrestrained” to qualify “traditional values” is symptomatic of an implicit belief that  voluntary  restraint on the part of people living in society is somehow undesirable, in contrast with which “restraint through being controlled” by others – the so-called elites – is desirable. Keeping in mind that these “elites,” minus any traditional values that function as guardrails within which civilisation develops, could foist just about any whim on people, who would presumably be “controlled” in such a manner that they would have no say in the matter.  Does that sound familiar? Isn’t that precisely what one witnessed during the Covid era, and could justifiably expect to occur again if another event, not “restrained by traditional values,” should be (ab)used to implement the same kind of controls as before? That this is no idle speculation is evident from a recent warning, issued by the high priest of the supposed “elites,” Klaus Schwab himself, that  climate change  will be the “next big virus,” accompanied by “restrictions worse than covid.” From the article one may gather that Smith’s depiction of the “Conspiracy” – although in a different context – rings true where Schwab and the World Economic Forum (“WEF”) are concerned: they prioritise control of ordinary mortals above everything else. Hence the usual pattern of disruption, followed by severe measures of restriction.  Moreover, again as the article in question avers, Schwab habitually uses “veiled threats” and “apocalyptic rhetoric to emphasise the need for global coordination, often promoting the centralisation of power under elite institutions including the World Economic Forum.” Unsurprisingly, the “crises” that the “elites” – that is, the Conspiracy – conjure up, are utilised as openings for them to strengthen and consolidate their control over the rest of us, predictably employing “fear-based programming, while reshaping society according to their vision.”   Another instance of the same old saw is encountered in the recent report of a WEF doctor – yes, they never stop, do they? – warning that  avian flu , an outbreak of which is perceived as being imminent, has been estimated as capable of killing “52% of the population,” simultaneously calling on the Biden administration to commence “a mass vaccination campaign before President Donald Trump is sworn in next month.” The most interesting thing here is the estimate, by the World Health Organisation (“WHO”), according to the doctor concerned, that “the mortality rate is 52%,” reflecting a precision that boggles the mind, considering that the strain of bird flu regarded as being dangerous to humans has,  as far as I can ascertain , not ever killed the number of people that allowed such a judgment to be made.  This does not mean that avian flu does not hold a significant threat for human beings, as I have argued  before , but it is imperative to distinguish between deliberate fear-mongering and the real McCoy, lest one fall for precisely the kind of ruse they need to get lethal needles into arms. As may be gathered from the above – Smith’s observations about the “Conspiracy” as well as the instances I have adduced to validate these – it is not at all far-fetched to claim that there are persuasive indications of the growth of organisations hellbent on the construction of a one-world government. Calling these, collectively speaking, the “Conspiracy” – while perhaps sounding paranoid – makes sense to the degree that (as some of Smith’s observations show) such a projected government would not be willing to share democratic power with ordinary citizens; on the contrary, it would rule in a  totalitarian  fashion. This has already been abundantly demonstrated by events over the last five years, as well as ongoing occurrences of the kind I have referred to.  About the Author Bert Olivier works at the Department of Philosophy, University of the Free State. Bert does research in Psychoanalysis, poststructuralism, ecological philosophy and the philosophy of technology, Literature, cinema, architecture and Aesthetics. His current project is ‘Understanding the subject in relation to the hegemony of neoliberalism.’ End Note by The Exposé In recent days, Donald Trump has proposed using “economic force” to annex Canada as the 51st state and has threatened to impose a 25% tariff on Canadian goods.  This would effectively create a “United States of North America.” Also in recent days, a “1942 Map of the New World Order” has been shared on social media as evidence that this plan has been long in the making.  The map by Maurice Gomberg proposed a reorganisation of the world into regions after an Allied victory in World War II. This map included the United States of America, encompassing the US, Canada, and several Caribbean and Pacific islands. A 1942 Map of the New World Order , Big Think, 28 July 2010 More than a decade ago, the European Commission (“EC”) also published a map showing its vision for carving the world into regions. The EC proposed dividing the world into 10 regions, which aligns with the Club of Rome’s 1973 proposal. According to End Times Truth : The Club of Rome in 1973 proposed that the new global order include dividing the world into 10 economic trading blocks.  Today, the European Commission includes a world map on their website that shows 10 groups of nations, which would be designed to consolidate regional control.  The first map of a 10-region division was done by the Club of Rome in their 1973 report ‘ Regionalised and Adaptive Model of the Global World System ’, and the EC map alters these divisions only slightly based upon changes over several decades of economic growth. The EC’s web page for the hyperlink provided by End Times Truth is no longer available.  However, a copy is archived on the Wayback Machine: World Map, Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission, 23 November 2013.  Archived HERE . How does the EC map compare to the Club of Rome?  You can compare for yourself. The Club of Rome 1973 report titled ‘ Regionalised and Adaptive Model of the Global World System ’ was authored by Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard Pestel.  It proposed dividing the world into ten economic and political regions, or “kingdoms,” to unite the entire world under a common leadership.  The report aimed to address global issues through a regionalised and adaptive model, suggesting that global problems could only be solved in a global context with a unified approach. You can find a copy of the Club of Rome’s report HERE but no map is attached.  Another version with a map can be found HERE .  Going by the title, this version was been taken from Milton William Cooper’s book ‘ Behold a Pale Horse ’.  The book’s appendix includes the full Club of Rome 1973 report beginning on page 449. Behold a Pale Horse , William Cooper, 1991, pg. 456 We found an almost identical map titled ‘ Regionalisation of the World Integrated Model’ included in a report published in 1976 titled ‘ Mankind at the Turning Point: The Second Report to the Club of Rome ’.  As with the first, this second report was also authored by Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard Pestel: Mankind at the Turning Point: The Second Report to the Club of Rome , 1976, pg. 38 In all four versions – Gomberg’s 1942 map, the EC map and the two Club of Rome reports – the United States and Canada are shown as one.  By Donald Trump threatening to annex Canada, is he simply following the plan, or the Conspiracy as Bert Oliver would say?

Every single “right wing” leader rising up to “defeat the left” is passionately devoted to Israel. It is positively bizarre to obsess over a foreign nation like this, especially when your own country is in shambles.