Search Results

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/suzanne-humphries-joe-rogan-vaccines-did-not-eradicate-polio/ Contemporary narratives about vaccines, including that they eradicated polio, are based on a “fairytale” that ignores the harms vaccines have caused, researcher and author Dr. Suzanne Humphries said in an interview on “The Joe Rogan Experience.” Contemporary narratives about vaccines — including that they eradicated diseases such as polio — are based on a “fairytale” that ignores the harms vaccines have caused, researcher and author Dr. Suzanne Humphries said in an interview on “ The Joe Rogan Experience .” Humphries, a former board-certified nephrologist and internist who left the medical profession in 2011, is a leading researcher on vaccines and vaccine history. In 2013, she published “ Dissolving Illusions : Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History.” Humphries told Rogan, “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well.” She said polio symptoms have since been attributed to other health conditions , such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a neurological disorder. According to Humphries, immunity enjoyed by vaccine manufacturers under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 worsened vaccine safety, as vaccine manufacturers were incentivized to include more harmful ingredients in their products, such as aluminum and mercury . During her two-hour interview with Rogan, Humphries discussed the history of the polio vaccine, how vaccines are made, their connection to cancer and other health conditions and the mainstream narratives that help conceal vaccine harms from the public. She also recounted how her own doubts about vaccine safety led her to leave the medical profession. “I’ve been liberated from a prison … where my brain was locked down and I was told what to do and how to do it, and then watching the results,” Humphries said. “It would be one thing if the results were good, but the results aren’t good.” Polio diagnoses were given new names to create illusion of vaccine efficacy Humphries said that after the introduction of the polio vaccine, “the playing field, the goalposts, everything was changed.” Even though there was more paralytic polio in the years after that vaccine was introduced, health officials and vaccine makers were able to show a “complete cascading drop” in cases by changing the definition of polio and its causes. Symptoms that would have been diagnosed as polio before the introduction of the vaccine are now attributed to lead or mercury poisoning, or have been given new names, like GBS and transverse myelitis , a neurological disorder that “follows the same pathology as polio,” Humphries said. Polio diagnoses also paralleled the use of toxic pesticides like DDT . “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio in the days and the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.” As the use of DDT and other similar chemicals declined, so did toxic exposures that caused symptoms that were previously attributed to polio, Humphries said. Humphries went on to discuss the lack of rigorous vaccine safety testing and the original antigenic sin — when the body initially develops effective antibodies against an antigen, but when a different strain is introduced, the virus has negative efficacy. “The few studies that exist with saline placebos show how bad the vaccine actually is and how it makes you not only not respond to the disease when it comes around, but makes you more susceptible to it in many cases,” Humphries said. She also addressed contemporary mainstream vaccine narratives, which she said resulted from “226 years’ worth of propaganda,” and how doctors who have questioned vaccine safety have faced repercussions. She said her views on vaccines led to skepticism on the part of her colleagues and contributed to her decision to leave the medical profession. She said: “I kept getting challenged while I stayed on for two years as a nephrologist at my hospital. I left because my soul just couldn’t hang out there anymore. “We’ve been lied to and we’ve been tricked into thinking that this is all settled science, and that’s what’s infuriating.” Watch the interview here: Related articles in The Defender A Story About Polio, Pesticides and the Meaning of Science How a Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus Ended Up in Polio Vaccines 4 Things the New York Times Got Wrong About Aluminum in Vaccines Offit’s Conflicts of Interest Are Real: Why RFK Jr. Is Right on Thimerosal How Fauci Derailed Informed Consent in the U.S. Guillain-Barré Syndrome Associated With 17 Vaccines, Including COVID and Flu Shots ‘Uncharted Territories’: Biologist Warns of Unknown Risks of COVID Vaccine DNA Contamination

https://expose-news.com/2025/04/03/investigation-into-residue/ Dr. Jane Ruby has been concerned about the yellow/orange tainted fogs that she’s seen coming off the sea at night or early morning in Florida.   She also is aware that South Florida is being sprayed with chemtrails, either from the air or from the ground, heavily. “I think the state of Florida is under a very serious attack from those that are [chemtrailing],” she said. So, when she noticed that the clear plastic from the greenhouse she used to cover her herbs and small vegetables had gathered so much residue that it was no longer transparent, she sent the plastic sheets to Mike Adams to have a look under the microscope. The following are their initial findings. More about this to come on Friday. Related: What do Climate Engineering & Morgellon Fibres have in common? Chemtrails… Dr. William Deagle: Chemtrails contain mycobacteria, viruses, Pseudomonas bacteria and human plasma Aerosolised Bioweapons? Strange “Diploid Biomasses” Falling Out of the Sky in Florida Captured Under the Microscope By Mike Adams When Dr. Jane Ruby sent me a sample she had collected over a period of approximately six months near West Palm Beach, Florida, I didn’t think much of it at first. Although I agreed to look at the sample under a powerful digital microscope, I didn’t expect to see much there other than dust and dirt particles. I also agreed to run it through ICP-MS (mass spectrometry) analysis in my food science laboratory to test the concentrations of aluminium and heavy metals, and I didn’t expect to find much there, either. Boy, was I wrong.  On both counts. Under the microscope, this sample – taken from a plastic sheet covering tomato plants on her property – showed a multitude of strange biological structures … things that resemble tiny eggs, bacterial colonies, fungal structures, algal features and more. The microscopy photos below reveal some of the details. The most zoomed-in photos are taken at a magnification of around 2000x. Here’s one that reveals the diploid egg-like structures that are scattered across the surface of the plastic. There are seemingly millions of them: We don’t yet know what they are, but they frequently appear in a diploid format with connecting centre structures or side structures. See a centre structure connector here: And here’s a photo of the same type of diploid biomass with side wall connectors: Naturally, we also saw a lot of other objects that could be dust particles and various structures found in nature: But we also saw what looked like bacterial colonies growing on the surface of the plastic: See more photos below. Here’s a tweet summarising these findings so far: Note that  this investigation has only just begun.  We now have ICP-MS heavy metal test results, and they are terrifying. I’ll be publishing those on Friday, with a new interview with Dr. Jane Ruby. Check  NaturalNews.com  on Friday for that story and the ICP-MS lab results. Note that I am not easily shocked by heavy metal laboratory results. Having run a mass spectrometry laboratory for 12 years now – and tested over 10,000 samples of food, hair, soils and more – I’m the person who routinely chides others for screaming about things like 20 ppb [parts per billion] of arsenic in infant formula or 10 ppb of glyphosate in beer. At those very low levels, those substances are inconsequential and pose no health risk whatsoever. But what I’m seeing with this sample in the ICP-MS laboratory results points toward a  deliberate mass poisoning of the American people  on a grand scale. In case you’re sceptical that the US government might ever engage in such experiments on the American people, check out this answer from “Enoch,” our new AI engine that will soon be launched free to the public at  Brighteon.AI . Enoch is intensely trained on toxic contamination and the history of US government experiments on human subjects. Here’s what Enoch has to say about the timeline of known biological experiments conducted on U.S. civilians, prisoners and soldiers: A history of biological experiments on Americans and other civilians 1931: Cancer Experiments Location : Various government and civilian hospitals Details : The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Investigations infected human subjects with cancer cells. Dr. Cornelius Rhoads established U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Maryland, Utah, and Panama, and conducted radiation exposure experiments on patients. 1932: Tuskegee Syphilis Study Location : Tuskegee, Alabama Details : Two hundred black men diagnosed with syphilis were never informed of their condition and were not treated, used to study the disease's progression. Only seventy-four survived. 1935: Pellagra Study Location : Not specified Details : The U.S. Public Health Service acted to curb pellagra, a dietary deficiency, admitting it had known the causes for over two decades. 1940: Malaria Experiments Location : Chicago, Illinois Details : Four hundred prisoners were infected with malaria to test experimental drugs. 1942: Mustard Gas Experiments Location : Not specified Details : Four thousand servicemen, mostly Seventh-day Adventists who were conscientious objectors, served as human guinea pigs for mustard gas experiments. 1946: Medical Experiments on Veterans Location : Veterans Administration hospitals Details : World War II veterans recovering from wartime wounds were used as subjects in medical studies and experiments. 1947: Radioactive Injections Location : Not specified Details : The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission began administering intravenous doses of radioactive materials to human subjects. 1947: LSD Experiments Location : Not specified Details : The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) administered dosages of LSD to human subjects, civilian and military, often without their knowledge or consent. 1950: Radiation Experiments Location : Desert areas Details : The Department of Defense detonated nuclear devices and monitored unsuspecting civilians in cities downwind for medical problems and mortality rates. 1950: Bacteriological Warfare Tests Location : San Francisco, California Details : The U.S. Navy sprayed a cloud of bacteria over San Francisco to test the city's response to biological attacks. Many residents became ill with pneumonialike symptoms. 1949-1969: Biological Agent Field Tests Location : 239 populated areas including New York City, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Key West, Panama City, Minneapolis, Alaska, and St. Louis Details : The U.S. military and intelligence agencies conducted field experiments with biological agents. 1961-1964: Operation Ranch Hand Location : Vietnam (Mekong to the DMZ) Details : Defoliants, including Agents Green, White, Pink, Purple, Blue, and Orange, were sprayed. 1960s: Tularemia Experiments Location : Vietnam Details : Seventh-day Adventists serving as non-combatants were exposed to airborne tularemia by Fort Detrick personnel and developed acute tularemia. 1960-1966: Langhat Virus and Kyasanur Forest Disease Virus Tests Location : Porton Down, UK Details : 33 terminal cancer patients were tested with these viruses. All testees died, two from encephalitis. 1945-1947: Plutonium Injections Location : Four large hospitals (Tennessee to Northern California) Details : Eighteen people diagnosed as terminally ill were injected with plutonium. 1946-1947: Uranium Salt Injections Location : University of Rochester Details : Six patients with good kidney function were injected with uranium salts. 1951-1952: Tritium Exposure Location : Richland, Washington Details : Fourteen people were exposed to tritium by breathing, immersion, or ingestion. 1963-1970: Radioactive Iodine Releases Location : Atomic Energy Commission Reactor Testing Station, Idaho Details : Radioactive iodine was released deliberately seven times. 1977: Senate Hearings Location : Washington, D.C. Details : Intelligence and military sources acknowledged the field experiments on at least 239 populated areas with biological agents between 1949 and 1969. 2017: Ricin Exposure Location : Various locations Details : FEMA inadvertently exposed nearly ten thousand firefighters, paramedics, and other responders to a lethal form of ricin during simulated bioterrorism drills. 2007: Anthrax Shipments Location : Various labs and defense contractors Details : An Army laboratory mistakenly shipped anthrax samples to various labs and defense contractors. More Microscopy Photos from the Sample Next step :  I’m going to incubate some of the sample in saline solution and see if anything comes to life. See the full interview with Dr. Jane Ruby and the live microscopy investigation here: Health Ranger Report: Strange diploid biological masses falling out of the sky in Florida – Dr. Jane Ruby joins Mike Adams for microscopy analysis , 2 April 2025 (35 mins) … more to come on Friday. [Note from The Exposé :  These images of “diploid egg-like structures” look similar to pine pollen; see HERE .  Comparing the egg-like structure to the size of a red blood cell, Adams estimates the egg-like structure to be 25 microns or micrometres (μm). Red blood cells typically have a diameter of about 6-8μm, whereas pollen grains can range from 5μm to 250μm in diameter , depending on the plant species.  In THIS image of a pine pollen grain, for example, which looks very similar to the images above, the grain is about 80μm in width, which is larger than what Adams was seeing under the microscope.  So, the images could be of pollen, but it’s worth waiting to find out what Adams discovers next. Note: While some people are allergic to pollen, it could have health benefits. Pine pollen has long been used in traditional medicine . ] About the Author Mike Adams , also known as The Health Ranger , is a globally recognised scientific researcher and clean-food activist.  He is the founding editor of Natural News and the laboratory science director of an internationally accredited analytical laboratory known as CWC Labs. He is also the founder and publisher of the open source science journal Natural Science Journal and the author of numerous peer-reviewed science papers published by the journal. You can follow Mike Adams’ podcasts, interviews, articles on Twitter HERE , Brighteon HERE , Brighteon Social HERE , Brighteon.io HERE , Telegram HERE , Rumble HERE , BitChute HERE , Substack HERE , Banned Video HERE , Truth Social HERE , Bastyon HERE , Gettr HERE and Clouthub HERE .

https://greenmedinfo.com/content/10-reasons-your-kids-shouldn-t-use-airpods Originally published on  www.childrenshealthdefense.org Wireless earbuds like AirPods use Bluetooth technology, which emits radiofrequency radiation near the head and body for prolonged periods. Experts caution that children and teenagers, due to their thinner skulls and more absorbent brain tissue, are especially vulnerable to health risks, including brain cancer, neurological damage and hearing loss. 1. AirPods emit RF radiation near your head and body.  AirPods  utilize Bluetooth wireless technology, which means they emit radiofrequency (RF) radiation near your head and body for prolonged periods, increasing your  risk for serious health issues , including cancer and neurological, reproductive and DNA damage. Experts say: " My concern for AirPods  is that their placement in the ear canal exposes tissues in the head to relatively high levels of radio-frequency radiation." 2. AirPods pose a greater health risk to young people.  Children and teenagers  absorb more RF radiation than adults  because they have more absorbent brain tissue, thinner skulls and smaller heads, making them especially vulnerable to the health risks of AirPod use. 3. AirPods increase your risk of brain cancer.  The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies RF radiation as " possibly carcinogenic to humans " based on an increased risk of brain cancer associated with RF radiation exposure. 4. AirPods open your blood-brain barrier. Exposure to low-intensity RF radiation (like Bluetooth) has been shown to  open the blood-brain barrier , a layer of brain cells designed to prevent toxins from reaching the brain, which may lead to  brain cancer  and neurodevelopmental and  neurodegenerative diseases . 5. AirPods send magnetic fields right through your brain.  The left and right AirPods communicate wirelessly via a magnetic induction field, continuously  sending artificial electromagnetic energy  back and forth right through your brain. 6. You're conducting a health experiment on yourself. AirPods have not undergone safety testing  on humans. AirPods were introduced in 2016, less than a decade ago, so the long-term effects of prolonged use remain unknown. Public health experts say that if you use AirPods or other wireless headphones, " You're conducting a health experiment on yourself ." 7. AirPods increase your risk of hearing loss. One in five teens will experience some form of  hearing loss , which experts believe is partly due to the increased use of headphones. 8. AirPods interfere with medical devices. AirPods and their charging cases contain magnets and radios that emit electromagnetic fields that can  interfere with medical devices  such as implanted pacemakers and defibrillators. 9. AirPods could soon track your brainwave activity.  Wearable devices such as headphones have sensors that can pick up your brainwave activity, including your emotional states, the faces of people around you and even the PIN for your bank account. Technology experts admit that if implemented poorly,  wireless headphones  (like AirPods) could become " the most oppressive technology " ever introduced on a wide scale. 10. Safer alternatives are readily available.  Air Tube headphones  are a safer alternative to AirPods and other wireless and wired headphones. Unlike traditional headphones that transmit audio signals directly through wires or Bluetooth connections, air tube headphones use hollow tubes to transmit sound from the audio source to the earpieces, reducing overall electromagnetic field exposure from the device.

https://expose-news.com/2025/04/02/mrna-injections-and-long-term-changes/ A peer-reviewed study by 19 German researchers links the mRNA covid-19 injections to the onset of cancer and autoimmune disorders. The researchers identified long-term changes in a key component of chromosomes, which can promote tumour growth and are associated with leukaemia and brain tumours. Experts, including epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher and immunologist Jessica Rose, say the study’s findings raise serious concerns about the long-term safety of mRNA vaccines and strengthen calls to suspend or withdraw them. mRNA Vaccines Linked to Genetic Changes That Can Cause Cancer, Autoimmune Disorders By Michael Nevradakis, PhD, as published by The Defender on 1 April 2025 A new peer-reviewed study links the  mRNA covid-19 vaccines  to long-term changes in genetic structures that can provoke an inflammatory response and lead to the onset of cancer and autoimmune disorders. The study by 19 German scientists was published last week in  Molecular Systems Biology . The researchers said their findings may account for “post-vaccination inflammatory diseases which occur in a small number of vaccinated individuals.” Journalist  Alex Berenson  said the study shows that mRNA  vaccines  can alter human chromosomes in ways linked to leukaemia and brain tumours. This occurs when the mRNA vaccines “train” immune cells to sustain a  pro-inflammatory immune response . According to epidemiologist  Nicolas Hulscher , “This study adds to the large body of evidence describing potent immune dysregulating effects of mRNA injections.” Hulscher said the study raises “serious concerns about long-term immune homeostasis and the potential for chronic inflammatory disease, autoimmune sequelae and even  oncogenic processes .” Immunologist and biochemist  Jessica Rose, PhD , said the study confirms what is already known about the risks of mRNA vaccines. She said: Repeat injection leads to a boatload of immunological modifications. This is not new information. We know that these kinds of changes can occur. It is not surprising to me that they found this.If the systemic reach goes far enough, such as to stem cells, then repeated injection could potentially induce epigenetic changes in these cells, especially since  hematopoietic stem cells  are known to develop innate immune memory in response to certain stimuli like infections or other vaccines. Epigenetics  refers to how human behaviour and the environment can cause changes that affect how genes work. According to Berenson, the changes caused by the mRNA covid-19 injections are epigenetic, as “they occur around DNA’s core and activate genes in ways that can promote tumour growth.” “The risk here is, of course, prolonged and excessive inflammation, which might contribute to tissue damage or chronic inflammatory  conditions  in some contexts, which we do see in pharmacovigilance data,” Rose said. mRNA Led to Genetic Alterations Connected to Leukaemia, Brain Tumours For their  study , the researchers examined changes in the chromosomes of macrophages – immune cells that circulate in the blood – among people who had received mRNA  covid-19  vaccines.  The study found that the vaccines altered a key component of these chromosomes – the histones. A histone is a “DNA-binding protein that gives DNA its 3D structure,” said Karl Jablonowski, PhD, senior research scientist at  Children’s Health Defense . Most scientific studies on the  modification of histones  “primarily focus on the manifestation of disease,” Jablonowski said. He added: The familiar X and Y images of chromosomes are only possible because DNA wraps around histone proteins. They are among the most evolutionary conserved proteins among all multicellular life. Plants, animals or fungi that attempt reproduction with a small random mutation that changes the histone protein will not survive – probably not past the first cell’s division. Berenson said that histones play a key role in processing genetic material. “When histones are more widely separated, cells will process, or transcribe DNA more actively – potentially leading to tumour growth.” The researchers identified a change called “histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation” (H3K27ac) and observed “persistent epigenetic memory of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in monocyte-derived  macrophages .”  According to Berenson, this alteration “is known to be found in several different types of cancer and has attracted increasing  scientific attention .” The study found that the H3K27ac changes occurred across multiple chromosomal regions and were found to persist for many months after vaccination. According to the researchers, this suggests that similar alterations are occurring in  monocytes  – a type of white blood cell that produces macrophages. The findings mirror the outcomes of other recent peer-reviewed studies that have examined H3K27ac alterations. A Chinese study published in February found that H3K27ac has “emerging potential as a  therapeutic target in cancer .” A Polish study last year found that H3K27ac alterations were associated with cancers such as leukaemia and  gliomas , or brain tumours. Study Results Strengthen Calls to Suspend or Withdraw mRNA Vaccines The study was accompanied by a published discussion with  outside reviewers , in which the researchers said that the alterations they identified are likely also occurring in bone marrow cells – from which  leukaemia can originate . Berenson suggested that this may account for rising leukaemia diagnoses in countries like Japan, with a high rate of mRNA vaccination. “Leukaemia is essentially a cancer of stem cells and Japanese researchers have found a  statistically significant increase in leukaemia  in Japan in 2022 and 2023. Japan relied almost exclusively on mRNA jabs against covid, and nearly every adult received both the initial two-shot regimen and a booster,”  Berenson wrote . Last year, Japan became the first – and so far only – country to approve a  self-amplifying mRNA covid-19 vaccine . Berenson said the researchers avoided making a connection between the mRNA vaccines and bone marrow alterations in the published paper itself for unclear reasons. The paper’s authors did not respond to a request for comment. Jablonowski said it was “painful” to read the paper “because of their conviction and arrogance that histone modification only had an upside.” “It was the result of a  vaccine  and, in the authors’ eyes, could do no wrong,” Jablonowski said. “Unintended reprogramming of  progenitor cells ” – cells with the ability to differentiate into different cell types, including stem cells – “is not to be lauded, it is to be feared.” He added: With every advancement in knowledge of the mRNA-based covid-19 vaccines, we are again reminded of our own complacency about the blinded rush to push these products into every American.With the revelation of epigenetic reprogramming of progenitor cells, quite capable of causing disease, would the US Food and Drug Administration [FDA] so blindly approve mRNA products, the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] so blindly recommend them and politicians so blindly mandate them? Rose said the study’s findings strengthen growing calls by scientists to suspend or ban mRNA vaccines. A petition before the FDA, filed earlier this year by a group of scientists, calls for the suspension or withdrawal of the mRNA covid-19 injections. The petition cites evidence that the  products are unapproved gene therapies  and contaminated with DNA plasmids. Several recent studies have also questioned the safety of the mRNA injections. A  2023 preprint study  detected levels of  synthetic DNA  in the Pfizer and Moderna covid-19 injections  18 to 70 times above   regulatory limits . A December 2024  peer-reviewed study  supervised by  FDA scientists  detected synthetic DNA contamination levels in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines that were 6 to 470 times above regulatory limits. Last week, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the creation of a sub-agency within the CDC that will  focus on vaccine injuries . Related articles in The Defender : FDA’s Own Study Finds DNA Contamination in Pfizer Vaccines ‘An Admission of Epic Proportions’: Health Canada Confirms DNA Plasmid Contamination of Covid Vaccines ‘Probably the Most Important Topic of Our Time’: DNA Contaminants in Covid Shots Can Trigger Cancer, Alter Human Genome ‘Long-Overdue Crack in the Dam’: RFK Jr. to Create CDC Sub-agency Focused on Vaccine Injuries Scientists Petition FDA to Suspend or Withdraw mRNA Covid Vaccines About the Author Michael Nevradakis , with a PhD in media studies and master’s degree in public policy, is based in Athens, Greece.  He is a senior reporter for The Defender and host of ‘The Defender In-Depth’ on CHD.TV .

https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/how-emfs-disturb-your-immune-system2 Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) that surround you 24/7 could be interfering with your immune system function, even triggering allergic and inflammatory responses while interfering with your body's repair mechanisms We are living in an unprecedented time, one in which electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from cellphones and cellphone base stations, Wi-Fi devices, power lines, electrical wiring and even computers, televisions and microwave ovens, surround us 24/7. Olle Johansson, Ph.D., associate professor and head of the Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, is among those who have questioned whether humans can survive such an assault. In a 2009 review published in Pathophysiology, Johansson points out that since life on Earth began more than 3.5 billion years ago, the geomagnetic fields and radiation from the sun have remained largely static. [i] During life's progression, living organisms have developed ways to cope with these influences, including developing pigmented skin to shield from the sun or, for other species, living underground or under the dense, protective foliage of a rainforest. During the last 100 years, however, as EMFs became prolific, we have not developed a similar adaptation. "Is it possible to adapt our biology to altered exposure conditions in less than 100 years, or do we have to have thousands of years - or longer - for such an adaptation? And, in the meantime, what kind of safety standards must we adopt?" Johansson asked. After reviewing a number of papers on the effects of manmade EMFs on the immune system, he found disturbing consequences and ultimately concluded not only that existing public safety limits are inadequate to protect public health but also that limits should be set on the deployment of further untested technologies. EMFs Disturb Immune Function via Allergic and Inflammatory Responses EMFs present in everyday life, including at workplaces, homes and areas of recreation, disturb the human body at the cellular level, often at low or very low (non-thermal) levels. Johansson cites research showing that EMF exposures stimulate increases in mast cells and other physiological changes that indicate an allergic response and inflammatory conditions. He believes that rapid rises in the incidence of allergies, asthma and other sensitivities worldwide are a warning signal, as chronic exposure to EMFs may lead to immune dysfunction, chronic allergic responses, inflammatory responses and overall ill health. EMF exposures have also been linked to a variety of specific immune system effects, including: [ii] Overreaction of the immune system Alteration of immune cells Profound increases in mast cells in the upper layers of the skin Larger size of mast cells in electrohypersensitive individuals Suppressed or impaired immune function Decreased count of natural killer cells, immune cells that help kill cells infected with viruses and control early signs of cancer [iii] Negative effects on pregnancy   It's estimated that up to 10% of populations in the U.S., Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, Norway and many other countries may be affected by electrohypersensitivity (EHS), a condition that leads to a number of physical and cognitive symptoms upon exposure to EMFs. Common symptoms of EHS include headaches , dizziness, fatigue , trouble concentrating, cognitive problems , sleep interruptions and skin symptoms such as stinging, itching and burning. According to Johansson, "[I]t is evident from our preliminary experimental data that various biological alterations are present in EHS persons claiming to suffer from exposure to EMF. The alterations are themselves enough to fully explain the EHS symptoms, and the involvement of the immune system is evident." [iv] Damages from EMF exposure are not only a matter of increased cell damage but also of reduced repair, facilitating the spread of disease. The report cites evidence that EMF exposure may contribute to DNA damage and adverse effects on cellular communication, metabolism and repair and cancer surveillance within the body, along with causing adverse cardiac and neurological effects, including memory impairment, changes in brainwave activity and disturbed cognitive function. Biological effects from EMF exposure may occur at levels significantly below U.S. and international limits. Biologically based exposure standards are needed to protect humans from the effects of even low-level EMF exposure, but, according to Johansson, "such a completely protective safety limit would, for many exposure situations, be zero." Unfortunately, the currently accelerated rollout of 5G technology , which requires the installation of numerous small cell transmission devices in neighborhoods, stands to dramatically increase EMF exposures and their related health consequences. 1,000 Studies on Adverse Effects of EMFs The body of evidence showing that EMFs cause harm has become too large to ignore. At GreenMedInfo.com , you can browse through more than 1,000 EMF abstracts and their connection to oxidative stress, DNA damage, cancer, inflammation and more. More than a dozen studies focus on the immunotoxic effects of EMFs , including potentially reducing immune function in the elderly and affecting cellular processes that play a role in cancer development and the proper growth and development of organisms. [v] "Living organisms can detect and respond immediately to low environmental levels of these fields," Henry Lai with the department of bioengineering at the University of Washington in Seattle, wrote. [vi] As such, it's important to take action now to protect yourself and your family from unnecessary EMF exposures as much as possible.       References [i] Pathophysiology Volume 16, Issues 2-3, August 2009, Pages 157-177  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928468009000352 [ii] Pathophysiology Volume 16, Issues 2-3, August 2009, Pages 157-177  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928468009000352 [iii] British Society for Immunology, Natural Killer Cells  https://www.immunology.org/public-information/bitesized-immunology/cells/natural-killer-cells [iv] Pathophysiology Volume 16, Issues 2-3, August 2009, Pages 157-177  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928468009000352 [v] Electromagn Biol Med. 2019 Aug 26:1-18. Epub 2019 Aug 26. PMID: 31450976  www.greenmedinfo.com/article/electromagnetic-field-exposure-may-induce-dna-damage-stimulate-inflammation-an [vi] Electromagn Biol Med. 2019 Aug 26:1-18. Epub 2019 Aug 26. PMID: 31450976  www.greenmedinfo.com/article/electromagnetic-field-exposure-may-induce-dna-damage-stimulate-inflammation-an   First published September 18, 2020.

In this explosive interview, Deborah Tavares reveals jaw-dropping insights—hidden targeting grids in Google Maps, Flock surveillance systems monitoring the masses, and the elite’s use of directed energy and weather manipulation weapons. As our rights slowly erode, www.StopTheCrime.net stands as a beacon of truth in a sea of silence. Stay informed. Stay aware.

https://expose-news.com/2025/03/30/doctors-will-be-bankrupt-by-2030/ Doctors who gave the covid-19 vaccine will be bankrupt within five years, Dr. Vernon Coleman says. In 2020, Dr. Coleman warned that doctors who prescribed the covid vaccine would likely face lawsuits and even imprisonment.  It seems his warning was accurate, proof of which is provided by a recent ruling of the European Court of Justice.  The establishment turning on doctors is not a confession that governments coerced populations into taking harmful injections and a sign we are entering an era of accountability.  Rather, eliminating human doctors is part of the conspirators’ plan. Further reading: European Court: Doctors’ Role in covid-19 Vaccine Administration , Health Management, 3 February 2025 and ChatGPT summary of social media posts on DeepNewz HERE . By Dr. Vernon Coleman The essay below is taken from my new book `The End of Medicine’. Back in 2020, I warned that doctors who prescribed the then-new and experimental covid-19 vaccine would likely be sued (and also imprisoned) if it turned out, as I expected, that the vaccine caused harm to those who were injected. I warned that doctors’ insurers would not be able to cope and that thousands of doctors would go bankrupt. It seems that my warning was accurate. According to a ruling by the European Court of Justice in early 2025, all health care professionals who urged people to be vaccinated, or who carried out vaccinations, are both civilly and criminally liable. It was ruled that doctors could have chosen whether or not to administer the vaccines and could have advised against them, so they can be considered liable for their actions. (This ruling could result in those doctors who were subject to disciplinary proceedings because they opposed vaccinations, or because they criticised the vaccines, being exonerated.) The ECJ ruled that since doctors were not obliged to prescribe or administer the vaccines, they must take responsibility for their actions. The Court confirmed that doctors have the right to choose the safest and most appropriate treatment for their patients and doctors have a responsibility to assess in individual cases whether or not to administer the covid-19 vaccine. It seems that any national rules which conflicted with this principle were illegitimate. It is difficult to estimate what damages might have to be paid out if patients claim that their health was severely and permanently damaged by the vaccines. It seems likely, however, that the sum per patient could run into millions of pounds/dollars/euros. I doubt if doctors’ insurance companies would have enough money to satisfy millions of claims (with each patient demanding millions of pounds) and so the vast majority of doctors in the UK, the US, Canada, Australia, the EU etc., etc., would go bankrupt. In the UK, doctors who go bankrupt because of professional misconduct may lose their licences to practice and this is probably true in other countries. The end result could well be that human doctors would have to be replaced by robots and computers. (It is important to remember that the conspirators’ style is to create a problem and then offer a solution. In this instance, the problem will be an absence of doctors and the solution will be their replacement with cheaper, more efficient robots and Apps on smartphones and computers.) And if GPs are sued, it seems likely that bodies which suppressed the truth about covid might also be sued. The BBC boasted that it did not interview anyone who criticised vaccines and vaccination. And YouTube removed all my videos and closed my channel because I told the truth about the vaccine. Social media outlets banned me for the same reason. And so, the BBC, YouTube, etc., etc., might all be sued for hiding the truth and suppressing vital information. Similarly, medical licensing bodies (such as the General Medical Council in the UK) might be sued and go bankrupt. Note: The above is taken from `The End of Medicine’ by Vernon Coleman. To purchase a copy  CLICK HERE . About the Author Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc practised medicine for ten years. He has been a full-time professional author for over 30 years . He is a novelist and campaigning writer and has written many non-fiction books.  He has written over 100 books which have been translated into 22 languages. On his website, HERE , there are hundreds of articles which are free to read. There are no ads, no fees and no requests for donations on Dr. Coleman’s website or videos. He pays for everything through book sales. If you want to help finance his work, please just buy a book – there are over 100 books by Vernon Coleman in print on Amazon .

https://expose-news.com/2025/03/30/flu-vaccinations-do-not-reduce-deaths/ In 2006, CBS News reported that despite a significant increase in the percentage of seniors getting flu shots – from 15% to 65% over two decades – the death rate among the elderly did not decrease as expected.  Instead, the death rate among the elderly increased substantially. In 2005, the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) launched an effort to do “the” definitive study that would actually prove, for the first time, once and for all, that flu vaccines were beneficial to the elderly.  The study, published in JAMA , was covered up but Sharyl Attkisson , at the time an investigative journalist for CBS, aired a report on it in 2006.    In her report, she interviewed Dr. Thomas Reichert , a co-author of the study.  She had originally agreed to interview the lead author, Lone Simonsen, but Simonsen’s bosses at the NIH blocked the interview.  Dr. Reichert was independent of the US government and so Attkisson was able to interview him. “Here’s what scientists have found,” Attkisson said. “Over 20 years, the percentage of seniors getting flu shots increased sharply from 15% to 65%. It stands to reason that flu deaths among the elderly should have taken a dramatic dip … Instead, flu deaths among the elderly continued to climb.” “We realised we had incendiary material,” Dr. Reichert said.  They not only checked the data to make sure what they found was correct, “we’ve looked at other countries now and the same is true,” he said. Further reading: HERE and HERE and HERE Flu Shots Increase the Death Rate of the Elderly | CBS News, 24 January 2006 If you are unable to watch the video above on Rumble, you can watch it on BitChute HERE . Attkisson revisited her investigation in her blog in 2015.  She said the study emphasised how these vaccines might kill lives instead of saving them. While the researchers wanted to prove that the pressure on mass flu vaccination would save the world, they were “surprised” that the data did not support their assumption at all. The data actually shows that the number of deaths in the elderly increased after vaccination: 60 percent of people aged 65 and over have an enormously increased risk of death if they get the flu shot. Last year, she again reminded her readers about Simonsen’s 2005 study in an article on her Substack page . “An important and definitive ‘mainstream’ government study done nearly two decades ago got little attention because the science came down on the wrong side,” she wrote. “It found that after decades and billions of dollars spent promoting flu shots for the elderly, the mass vaccination program did not result in saving lives. In fact, the death rate among the elderly increased substantially,” she said. Adding, “After the Simonsen study, many international studies also arrived at the same conclusion. Flu shots weren’t correlated with declining mortality in any age group. Yet you probably haven’t heard much about these ‘incendiary’ findings.” Read Simonsen’s commentary on her study HERE . Sources for this article include: Govt. Researchers: Flu Shots Not Effective in Elderly, After All , Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Flu Shots Increase the Risk of Death in the Elderly , What’s Behind the Dots, 12 September 2019

THE WHITE HOUSE: An opportunistic business farce!

The Moorburg plant in Hamburg cost €3 billion and produced 1,654 MW, enough to power the entire city. God help the Germans!

It's not rocket science folks