3909 items found
- The COVID19 Testing SCAM
https://lbry.tv/@Conscience_Stream:9/COVID19-Test-SCAM:b?fbclid=IwAR06PaKxGKQ7H_p9b3PgkmV8praRIyE7GZk10j1y8u67hGE8I0tRTdUyONs COVID19 is generally assumed to be caused by a virus named SARS-COV-2 and infection is mostly diagnosed by RT-PCR testing. What exactly are they testing for? Some scientists claim that it is a unique sequence of RNA that is only found in SARS-COV-2, others claim that it could have been some random RNA / DNA fragment from the human body because of the improper testing methods and resulting impure substance that it was "sequenced" from. Well, now we know. The sequence has been compared to the human genome and was found! There is no mistaking it, they're testing for something that exists in every human on the planet, and they're making a vaccine to trick your body's immune system to attack this bit of DNA as if it were a foreign substance. What effect do you think that might have on your health? Getting tested for COVID19 is a mistake. DO NOT GET TESTED!!!
- How Bill Gates Controls COVID-19 and Global Food Supply
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/08/21/food-and-agriculture-policy-bill-gates-foundation.aspx?cid_source=wnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art6HL&cid=20200903Z2&mid=DM641354&rid=955272954 Story at-a-glance Bill Gates wields powerful influence over global food and agriculture policy through his funding of a large number of organizations involved in agricultural development and policy making. Eleven of just 12 people urging the UN to retain Agnes Kalibata, the president of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), as its special envoy to the 2021 United Nations Food Systems Summit, were funded by Gates. This is in stark contrast to those who opposed Kalibata: 176 civil society organizations and farmer groups, plus 500 additional signatories, called for withdrawal of her appointment due to her clear conflicts of interest with corporate actors. Gates’ massive investments in global food production have failed to solve any real problems. The solutions he backs are “Band-Aid solutions” that only deepen the root problems. Examples include the funding of the development of GMOs. These crops end up replacing local diversity with just a few GE varieties that don’t take local conditions into account. By pushing GE crops, malnutrition actually deepens, as biodiversity is reduced. Gates is a perfect example of a philanthrocapitalist. He has “donated” tens of billions of dollars over the years, yet his net worth hasn’t dropped — it has doubled, and this is largely because his donations are treated as tax deductible investments.
- Exposing the Statin Controversy
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/08/26/have-statins-reduced-heart-disease.aspx?cid_source=wnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art3HL&cid=20200903Z2&mid=DM641354&rid=955272954 Story at-a-glance The food industry shifted away from saturated fat and cholesterol to improve public health, and the medical industry has massively promoted the use of cholesterol-lowering statin drugs for the same reason. Despite that, the rate of heart disease deaths has steadily risen. Research has found that the more LDL (so-called “bad”) cholesterol is lowered, the greater the risk of heart attacks and strokes. The Minnesota Coronary Experiment, published in 2016, found replacing saturated fat with vegetable oil increased mortality and cardiovascular events, even though total cholesterol was lowered by 13.8%. For each 30 mg/dL reduction in serum cholesterol, the death risk rose by 22%. Since the commercialization of statin drugs in the late ‘80s, total sales have reached nearly $1 trillion. Lipitor is the most profitable drug in the history of medicine. Yet these drugs have done nothing to derail the rising trend of heart disease. While there are studies claiming to show statins lower your risk of heart attack, many involve misleading plays on statistics. Statins also have many serious side effects.
- Class action against Andrews, Sutton and others
https://www.gofundme.com/f/class-action-against-andrews-sutton-and-others?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=p_cp%20share-sheet&fbclid=IwAR3_yIlnMeYorGNmTBKOsTTlAX2dljzfa-5tDWxEMWGQsJqZwJK3lVPph5A We have instructions to commence a class action against Daniel Andrews, Brett Sutton, Jenny Mikakos, the Victorian Government and other individuals to sue for unspecified damages arising out of the directions and orders placed on the good people of Victoria. This action will be filed in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The lead plaintiffs at this time are Mr Viktor Grujic (a UFC fighter who appeared on the reality tv show 'The Ultimate Fighter'), another gentleman sole trader who operates a fishing and tackle shop in metropolitan Melbourne and Mr Paul Lay from regional Victoria. The lockdown restrictions and directions have caused many small businesses and sole traders to permanently close and are pushing people to the brink of bankruptcy. We know that there are millions of Victorian people struggling right now. This class action is for you, the good people of Victoria. Daniel Andrews, Brett Sutton and Jenny Mikakos will be named as individual defendants in the proceedings. We will allege that they are personally liable as a result of their individual actions going well and truly beyond their respective powers. Nathan Buckley, Partner of G&B Lawyers is the promoter of this class action. This action is going to happen. No refunds will be provided. If you wish to be an applicant in these proceedings please contact Nathan Buckley immediately by email and or mobile phone on 0411 067 367.
- It's gone too far in Australia!
Victoria Police execute a warrant and ARREST pregnant woman in front of her children for a Facebook post.
- CDC Admits to Inflating COVID Death Count
https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/cdc-inflates-coronavirus-deaths Another great article by Ty & Charlene Bollinger below. Just remember that these principles can be applied globally to most developed countries, including Australia! Why? Because it's part of a global agenda! The CDC recently released data showing that 94% of reported COVID-19 deaths may have been falsely reported. According to recent data from the government agency, only 6% of deaths attributed to COVID-19 can actually be attributed to the virus. We’ve been told that drastic measures that have destroyed small business, put millions out of work, and officially revoked religious freedoms are necessary. We’ve been told that this virus has killed over 180 THOUSAND Americans since March. But what if that number was lower? What if 94% of the 180,000 fatalities attributed to the disease were lies? According to the newly released CDC data, only 10,800 of those 180,000 can truly be attributed to the virus. The “pandemic” that has crippled our economy and society is a lie. The CDC and our politicians know it. We said the same thing months ago. Millions out of work. Billions in tax bailouts. Suicides, hunger, and abuse skyrocketing. And the numbers driving this devastation are 94% wrong. Let’s repeat that: Only 6% of COVID-19 deaths can actually be attributed to the virus itself. Our government has lied to us, and that lie has been catastrophic. The rise in the number of unemployed workers due to COVID-19 is substantially greater than the increase due to the Great Recession. Substance abuse has increased. Mental health issues have increased. Suicides have increased. In fact, a survey last month found that at least 40% of adults in the U.S are struggling with mental illness or drug abuse. In fact, 11% of those surveyed said that they have “seriously considered suicide” since the outbreak. 11% Domestic abuse is up. Defaults on loans and mortgages are up. Child abuse is up. Abuse of people with special needs is up. Americans are depressed, poor, isolated, and hopeless. And it’s exclusively due to false data and media lies. This is going to be a long read, so we’ll break it into three main sections for you (feel free to bookmark or share this page and come back for the entire story). First, we’re going to demonstrate that the mortality rate of the disease (and the narrative that hospitals are overwhelmed) is a lie. Second we’ll discuss the fact that masks, social distancing, and business closures are ineffective and extremely dangerous. Finally, we’ll talk about how the government and elite have used this fake pandemic to gain more control, steal more money, and wage guerrilla war on liberty. Everything You Know About COVID-19 Is A Lie We’ve been told that COVID-19 is lethal. That it has killed nearly 200,000 Americans. That masks, social distancing, and the sudden shutdown of our economy are the only reason more haven’t died. But there’s a big difference between dying FROM the virus and dying WITH the virus. According to the CDC, only 6% of coronavirus deaths can be confirmed as coronavirus deaths. “For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death,” they say. (You can look at the official data here.) So, for over 95% of reported deaths (the same deaths that have led to economic collapse and significant loss of life), there were almost 3 additional causes of death. People who have drowned, people with late-stage cancer, people involved in traffic collisions… ALL of these people we classified as COVID-19 deaths simply because they tested positive. There are 3 fundamental truths that you need to understand: Reporting is Faulty Tests Are Faulty Most Patients Are Not Contagious Reporting is Faulty That’s really the headline here. 94% of reported fatalities had other causes of death. But it gets worse. Reliable data and information are essential to making decisions. You can’t plan a dinner party if you don’t know what’s on the menu or how many guests will attend. You can’t order parts to fix your car if you haven’t diagnosed the problem. And you can’t effectively implement drastic, global, “protective” protocols if you don’t yet understand the extent of the virus. And yet, that’s exactly what’s been happening. Scarce and unreliable data haven’t stopped entire nations from issuing “stay at home” orders and forcibly closing millions of businesses. A massive amount of the U.S. population is now out of work and quarantined in their homes despite virtually no reliable data to support it. Professor John Ioannidis (an expert in medicine, epidemiology, population health, biomedical data science, and statistics) may have summed it up best: “The data collected so far on how many people are infected and how the epidemic is evolving are utterly unreliable. Given the limited testing to date, some deaths and probably the vast majority of infections due to SARS-CoV-2 are being missed. We don’t know if we are failing to capture infections by a factor of three or 300… This evidence fiasco creates tremendous uncertainty about the risk of dying from COVID-19. Reported case fatality rates, like the official 3.4% rate from the World Health Organization, cause horror — and are meaningless. Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes. As most health systems have limited testing capacity, selection bias may even worsen in the near future.” “The numbers are almost meaningless,” says Steve Goodman, a professor of epidemiology at Stanford University. There’s a huge reservoir of people who have mild cases, and would not likely seek testing, he says. The rate of increase in positive results reflects a mixed-up combination of increased testing rates and spread of the virus. It’s also worth mentioning that many COVID-19 cases are diagnosed without tests. If a person dies with COVID symptoms (which are common among MANY diseases), doctors may diagnose them without ever testing. If a person dies and tests positive for the virus, they’re added to the body count. But that’s scientifically irresponsible at best and criminally negligent at the worst. In Italy, New York, and other parts of the world where the outbreak has been most severe, the likelihood that many of these fatalities weren’t caused by the virus is high. We know that COVID-19 is much worse for the older population. Those aged 0-64 make up about 84% of the U.S. population. But they only account for a little over half of the documented hospitalizations and about 20% of all deaths. Meanwhile, those aged 65-84 make up a little over 14% of the population but account for 36% of hospitalizations and 46% of the deaths. Those 85+ comprise only 2% of our population, yet they account for 9% of hospitalizations and a whopping 34% of deaths! Now, we’re not saying that every life isn’t precious. Anyone who knows us (or our mission) can see that preserving human life is our primary mission. But when you look at the numbers in context, things just don’t add up. We know that this disease disproportionately affects the elderly. It also disproportionately affects those with compromised immune systems. But so does almost every disease known to man. Did you know that the median life expectancy in the U.S. is about 78 years? The sad truth is that people die every day… and older people die more often. If an elderly person comes in with health issues, passes away, and is diagnosed with the virus, they are added to the number of people killed by COVID-19 – EVEN IF THEY HAD OTHER UNDERLYING CONDITIONS! To put that into perspective, there have been reports of people around the country dying from car accidents, drowning, or premature birth who have been counted among the coronavirus victims. But the testing has been notoriously unreliable, and the causation simply isn’t there. Just last month, it was confirmed that a positive test is no longer required to attribute a fatality to the virus. Which brings us to point #2… Tests Are Faulty The U.S. government has mismanaged Covid testing so badly that we were both the slowest and the most inaccurate when it comes to COVID testing. Rather than allow the free market to create testing kits, the government assigned the task to the CDC, who rolled out an inaccurate test, contaminated thousands of samples, and refused to test a patient in Northern California who turned out to be the first probable COVID19 cases. The more data and information we have, the more we can make informed decisions. In this case, bad and missing data resulted in catastrophically terrible decisions. And testing today is still wildly inaccurate. Earlier this month, shortly before Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine was due to meet President Donald Trump at a Cleveland airport, the governor tested positive on a rapid antigen test for the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, that causes the disease COVID-19. Two follow-up tests, using a more accurate polymerase chain reaction, or PCR test, showed the governor didn’t have the virus. This kind of false positive with an antigen test isn’t an isolated incident. Dozens of people who took a rapid SARS-CoV-2 test developed by biotech company Quidel at a Manchester, Vermont, clinic in July were told they had the virus. Subsequent PCR tests run by the state’s Department of Health found that only 4 out of those 65 were positive. Testing is inaccurate. Patients are sometimes diagnosed without being tested. There are likely millions of infected people with no symptoms. And the death toll is a flat-out lie. And even when tests are accurate, they can still be misleading. Most Patients Are Not Contagious The New York Times published a story Saturday which looked at the accuracy of the most popular coronavirus tests currently in use. It found that the tests are being run in such a way that they are far too sensitive. The Times estimates that up to 90% of the people who receive a positive test are carrying so little virus that they probably aren’t contagious; only about 10% would need to consider isolating themselves. The standard tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus. We’ve known for months (based on the available data) that the coronavirus does not act like normal cough and cold viruses that we often catch from children. In a surprise to pediatricians, teachers and parents alike, the virus behaves the opposite of what we are used to. Children and adolescents do not seem to get sick with Covid-19 as frequently as adults. And children, especially elementary school-age children, do not seem to transmit it effectively to one another, nor to adults. This has been documented in countries around the world, including Greece, Switzerland and Australia. Even when schools are open, most children who get ill are found to have been infected by someone in their household, not from a school contact. According to the CDC’s own data, people aged 0-24 account for 0.2% of documented COVID-19 deaths. And remember – only 6% of those are actually confirmed! And since the vast majority of infections seem to be asymptomatic, there is an extremely high likelihood that there are thousands – even millions – of infected Americans who have not been tested or diagnosed. So the tests are bad, the data is bad, and most people probably aren’t even carriers. But there’s one more lie we need to address before we move on. And it involves the fundamental rhetoric of “flattening the curve”. Hospitals Are Not Overwhelmed (the U.S. is actually in great shape) Despite the narrative you may have heard from the mainstream media, our health system (while riddled with flaws), was prepared for an event like this. While the federal government’s pandemic preparedness was sorely lacking, the fact is America’s system of private medicine has left us far better positioned for today’s crisis than other nations. As Scott Gottlieb, former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, explained in an interview, here in the United States, “we’re going to have a better experience [with COVID-19] than a lot of other countries because of how good our system is at delivering critical care.” And while we hate to say it, Gottlieb is right. The United States has 20 to 30 intensive care unit beds for every 100,000 people, the most per capita of any country in the world. That is at least 75% more than in the United Kingdom, where the government-run National Health Service had a meager 5,900 ventilators before the pandemic struck. Here’s some quick math: Ignoring false positives and misdiagnoses, the U.S. has seen 6,212,174 cases. The official number of deaths due to COVID currently stands at 187,742 The U.S. population is about 331,002,651 This means that the percentage of the population diagnosed with the virus is about 1.9% The WHO estimates that around 20% of infected patients will require hospitalization This means that the number of hospitalized patient in the U.S. is roughly 1,242,434 About 0.37% of the U.S. population needed hospitalization The vast majority (about 75%) of hospitalized patients do not require intensive care This means that about 0.09% of the U.S. population required intensive care That figure amounts to 9 in every 10,000 And while that number may seem high at first, remember that the CDC confirmed that 94% of reported covid deaths accompanied other morbidity factors. Cancer patients, people injured in car accidents, drowning victims, and people with existing heart or respiratory disease were routinely counted among the death toll for the virus. Admittedly, the virus may well have exacerbated some preexisting conditions. It would be unfair to claim that 94% percent of cases weren’t caused – at least in part – by the virus. But the reality is that people go to the hospital all the time. Approximately 4 million patients are admitted to the ICU each year. Given that 94% of patients had other illness or injury, it may well be that the number of ICU admissions for COVID-19 is around 12,424. That number, while serious for patients and their families, barely registers against the 4 million ICU admissions normally seen each year. And as usual, the U.S. government found a way to squander millions of dollars responding to a threat that never really existed. Early this spring, the Army Corps of Engineers mobilized in the U.S., hiring private contractors to build emergency field hospitals around the country. The endeavor cost more than $660 million, according to an NPR analysis of federal spending records. But nearly four months into the pandemic, most of these facilities haven’t treated a single patient. In fact, of the 13,727 beds made available, only 1,177 patients were seen. The majority of these field hospitals saw exactly 0 patients. That’s $560,747.66 per patient. But squandering money on unnecessary field hospitals is not the only mistake the government made in response to the virus. Safety Measures Don’t Work In a knee-jerk response fueled by faulty data (or, in many cases, no data at all), the U.S. government shut down business and began mandating mask use. But do masks work? The CDC says that even simple face coverings are better than nothing in order to “slow the spread” and limit the transmission of coronavirus. Let’s go over the FACTS about masks and COVID-19. Here are 12 FACTS that we KNOW… No studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on transmission of COVID-19. As a matter of fact, research published in the Annals of Internal Medicine at the first of April indicated that “both surgical and cotton masks seem to be ineffective in preventing the dissemination of SARS–CoV-2 from the coughs of patients with COVID-19.” In a February 2020 meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials involving 9,171 patients, there were no statistically significant differences in preventing influenza or viral infections using N95 respirators and surgical masks. A May 2020 study involving 159 healthcare workers aged 21 to 35 years of age found that 81% developed headaches from wearing a face mask. In a 2008 study of surgical masks worn by 53 surgeons, researchers found that the mask reduced the blood oxygen levels significantly, creating a condition known as “hypoxia.” A 2015 study indicated that hypoxia inhibits T-lymphocytes (the main immune cells used to fight viral infections) by increasing the level of a compound called hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1). In other words, wearing a mask, which has been shown to cause hypoxia, may actually set the stage for contracting COVID-19 and make the consequences much worse. Hypoxia promotes inflammation which can promote the growth, invasion and spread of cancers. Hypoxia is also a significant factor in atherosclerosis, thus it increases the risk of stroke and heart attack. The WARNING on the box of surgical masks states clearly “THIS PRODUCT WILL NOT PROVIDE ANY PROTECTION AGAINST COVID-19 (CORONAVIRUS) OR OTHER VIRUSES OR CONTAMINANTS.” Those who wear masks are constantly rebreathing the viruses, raising the concentration of the virus in the lungs and the nasal passages. By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and can travel into the brain. Anthony Fauci, head of the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), did an interview on 60 Minutes where he said, “People shouldn’t be walking around wearing masks.” The World Health Organization says that there is no need for healthy people to wear face masks. They recommend that healthy people only wear masks when taking care of someone infected with COVID-19. Surgeon General Jerome Adams advised against the general public wearing face masks, saying they were “not proven to be effective” in preventing people from contracting COVID-19. Although the CDC recommends wearing masks, they admitted that they do not have data to confirm that wearing a mask reduces the risk of contracting or spreading COVID-19. The World Health Organization’s guidance about when to wear a face mask may seem confusing to Americans, who have been advised by the CDC to wear cloth face masks in public to help slow the spread of COVID-19. “If you are healthy, you only need to wear a mask if you are taking care of a person with COVID-19,” the WHO guidelines read. And at first, the CDC agreed. After months of maintaining that healthy people didn’t need to wear masks in public to prevent the coronavirus, the country’s top public health officials reversed their position, recommending that everyone wear a face mask in public places where social distancing is difficult. It’s a stark change from the early weeks of the outbreak, when the CDC said only two groups of people needed to wear them: people who were showing symptoms and people who were taking care of someone who was sick. And the fallout of shutting down our economy will be far more severe than the virus itself. Economy and Public Health One of the most common attacks we’ve heard on those who support reopening our economy and salvaging our liberties is that we care more about the economy than human life. But the truth is that the two are invariably intertwined. The more damage we do to our society and economy, the higher the death toll will rise. In fact, there will almost certainly be more loss of life from the reaction to coronavirus than the disease itself. Reuters summarized a few of them beautifully: Domestic Violence Trapped at home with their abusers, some domestic violence victims are already experiencing more frequent and extreme violence, said Katie Ray-Jones, the chief executive officer of the National Domestic Violence Hotline. Domestic violence programs across the country have cited increases in calls for help, news accounts reported – from Cincinnati to Nashville, Portland, Salt Lake City and statewide in Virginia and Arizona. The YWCA of Northern New Jersey, in another example, told Reuters its domestic violence calls have risen up to 24%. “There are special populations that are going to have impacts that go way beyond COVID-19,” said Ray-Jones, citing domestic violence victims as one. Vulnerable Students Students, parents, and teachers all face challenges adjusting to remote learning, as schools nationwide have been closed and online learning has begun. Some experts are concerned that students at home, especially those living in unstable environments or poverty, will miss more assignments. High school students who miss at least three days a month are seven times more likely to drop out before graduating and, as a result, live nine years less than their peers, according to a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation report. Among the most vulnerable: the more than 6 million special education students across the United States. Without rigorous schooling and therapy, these students face a lifetime of challenges. Special needs students “benefit the most from highly structured and customized special education,” said Sharon Vaughn, executive director of the The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk at the University of Texas. “This means that they are the group that are most likely to be significantly impacted by not attending school both in the short and long term.” In New Jersey, Matawan’s Megan Gutierrez has been overwhelmed with teaching and therapy duties for her two nonverbal autistic sons, eight and 10. She’s worried the boys, who normally work with a team of therapists and teachers, will regress. “For me, keeping those communications skills is huge, because if they don’t, that can lead to behavioral issues where they get frustrated because they can’t communicate,” Gutierrez said. Soaring Suicides In Europe and the United States, suicide rates rise about 1% for every one percentage point increase in unemployment, according to research published by lead author Aaron Reeves from Oxford University. During the last recession, when the unemployment in the United States peaked at 10%, the suicide rate jumped, resulting in 4,750 more deaths. If the unemployment rate increases to 20%, the toll could well rise. “Sadly, I think there is a good chance we could see twice as many suicides over the next 24 months than we saw during the early part of the last recession,” Reeves told Reuters. That would be about 20,000 additional dead by suicide in the United States and Europe. Less than three weeks after extreme suppression measures began in the United States, unemployment claims rose by nearly 10 million. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin warned the rate could reach 20% and Federal Reserve economists predicted as high as 32%. Europe faces similarly dire forecasts. Some researchers caution that suicide rates might not spike so high. The conventional wisdom is that more people will kill themselves amid skyrocketing unemployment, but communities could rally around a national effort to defeat COVID-19 and the rates may not rise, said Anne Case, who researches health economics at Princeton University. “Suicide is hard to predict even in the absence of a crisis of Biblical proportions,” Case said. This week, the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado, relaxed its strict social isolation policies after the apparent suicides of two cadet seniors in late March, The Gazette, a Colorado Springs newspaper, reported. While juniors, sophomores and freshmen had been sent home, the college seniors were kept isolated in dorms, and some had complained of a prison-like setting. Now, the seniors will be able to leave campus for drive-thru food and congregate in small groups per state guidelines. Public Health Crippled Local health departments run programs that treat chronic diseases such as diabetes. They also help prevent childhood lead poisoning and stem the spread of the flu, tuberculosis and rabies. A severe loss of property and sales tax revenue following a wave of business failures will likely cripple these health departments, said Adriane Casalotti, chief of government affairs with the National Association of County and City Health Officials, a nonprofit focused on public health. After the 2008 recession, local health departments in the U.S. lost 23,000 positions as more than half experienced budget cuts. While it’s become popular to warn against placing economic concerns over health, Casalotti said that, on the front lines of public health, the two are inexorably linked. “What are you going to do when you have no tax base to pull from?” she asked. Carol Moehrle, director of a public health department that serves five counties in northern Idaho, said her office lost about 40 of its 90 employees amid the last recession. The department had to cut a family planning program that provided birth control to women below the poverty line and a program that tested for and treated sexually transmitted diseases. She worries a depression will cause more harm. “I honestly don’t think we could be much leaner and still be viable, which is a scary thing to think about,” Moehrle said. Job-loss Mortality Rises in unemployment during large recessions can set in motion a domino effect of reduced income, additional stress and unhealthy lifestyles. Those setbacks in income and health often mean people die earlier, said Till von Wachter, a University of California Los Angeles professor who researches the impact of job loss. Von Wachter said his research of past surges in unemployment suggests displaced workers could lose, on average, a year and a half of lifespan. If the jobless rate rises to 20%, this could translate into 48 million years of lost human life. Von Wachter cites measures he believes could mitigate the effects of unemployment. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act approved by the White House last week includes emergency loans to businesses and a short-time compensation program that could encourage employers to keep employees on the payroll. Young People Suffer Young adults entering the job market during the coronavirus suppression may pay an especially high price over the long term. First-time job hunters seeking work during periods of high unemployment live shorter and unhealthier lives, research shows. An extended freeze of the economy could shorten the lifespan of 6.4 million Americans entering the job market by an average of about two years, said Hannes Schwandt, a health economics researcher at Northwestern University, who conducted the study with von Wachter. This would be 12.8 million years of life lost. Thousands of college graduates will enter a job market at a time global business is frozen. Jason Gustave, a senior at William Paterson University in New Jersey who will be the first in his family to graduate from college, had a job in physical therapy lined up. Now his licensure exam is postponed and the earliest he could start work is September. “It all depends on where the economy goes,” he said. “Is there a position still available?” Even the U.N., which has vigorously supported the draconian suspension of industry, society, and freedom, says that “hundreds of thousands of children could die this year due to the global economic downturn sparked by the coronavirus pandemic and tens of millions more could fall into extreme poverty as a result of the crisis” Every day that our country remains closed, more people around the world will die. And that fatal decision has been made by a few public servants who would fancy themselves omnipotent overlords. And as Americans suffer, The government and the extremely wealthy are taking advantage. The Elite Class is Scamming Us The powers that be – billionaires, the tech and pharmaceutical industries, and governments around the world – have used fear as a means to seize the very freedoms that define our society. Many of us are at the mercy of these authorities. Businesses are failing, citizens are hurtling towards financial ruin, and the rights enshrined in the constitution have been stripped. Practicing safe habits as a virus spreads is important. Supporting your immune system, practicing proper hygiene, and taking care of those most vulnerable among us is of paramount importance. But the oppressive measures taken against us will cause far more damage than this virus ever could. Yes, there are ways to boost your immune system. Yes, you should absolutely practice proper hygiene and responsible social distancing to protect those most vulnerable to disease. And yes, this is a very real disease that will claim some lives. But the government has quietly stripped us of our freedoms, and they will start demanding concessions before they return them. Increased taxes. Bailouts for mega-corporations. New vaccine requirements. Medical tracking and registration. Communist-era social surveillance. If we comply with their demands in exchange for our liberty, we are acknowledging that our liberty is subject to the whims of a few self-important government officials and the corrupt corporations that support them. The inevitable conclusion to this chapter of our history will be a bargain: comply with government orders and they will return to you your freedom. But conditional freedom is no freedom at all. And it’s time we sent that message loud and clear. The $2 trillion stimulus package approved by the government is intended to help ease some of the strain the country is feeling, but a closer look under the hood reveals an unsatisfactory distribution of funds for a potentially cataclysmic crisis. Here is a quick breakdown: Individuals: A direct deposit of around $1,000 in cash into the average American’s bank account. Big Business: Airlines are expected to be the largest recipient of this pie with about ~15% of this chunk. Small Business: $10 million loans to small businesses to help make rent or make payroll. Public and Health Services: $100 billion going to healthcare providers allotted to help them make up for lost revenue coming in from elective surgery. Red flags run through the entire stimulus. Any cash deposit is always welcome, but $1,000 is not going to sustain most Americans through to the other end of the economic recovery. Why are airlines the largest recipients of the Big Business pool of money? Even now, as Congress is attempting to pass a new stimulus bill, the two parties are in a deadlock. Both sides are using this bill to force their own agendas, unrelated to the current economic crisis. A crisis they caused in the first place. Americans are literally being held hostage and used as bargaining chips in political showdown between the two parties. As it turns out, all of this is the result of faulty data and lies. And artificially inflated statistics are responsible for the economic and social collapse we’re currently experiencing. Enough is enough. Politicians are supposed to work for us. They should use our tax dollars sparingly and responsibly, and they should protect our constitutional rights instead of stripping them away. Our governments have crossed a line that they cannot uncross. They have taken freedom hostage. And soon, they will offer vaccines and other concessions as the terms for its release. It is of paramount importance that we do not accept their terms.
- AUSTRALIA'S BRAVEST MAN (And he's 76 years old) Police Interview
The accused at Greater Melbourne between the 16th of August 2020 and the 27th of August 2020 did incite another person/persons to pursue a course of conduct that involved the commission of an offence by promoting a planned protest with the intention to incite person/persons to contravene namely s 203 (1) of the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 by encouraging them to not wear masks and also to leave their residence without a specified reason as provided by the stay at home directions restricted areas.
- "You Can't Handle the Truth!"
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/you-can-t-handle-the-truth?utm_campaign=6567227a-b515-4eb6-bae7-1b6bdc8c7e5f&utm_source=so&utm_medium=mail&cid=2f5bf5a4-ab83-47b5-8036-b6279dcd98f3 "You Can't Handle the Truth" was a line in the movie, "A Few Good Men" - Please watch and listen before reading the rest of this short but very important article! This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid - 19 fatalities! The real and truthful numbers (unlike those reported by the fake news) reflect that only 6% of all 164,280 deaths recorded actually died from Covid-19! What this means is the real number of fatalities for COVID-19 in the USA amount to 9,857 deaths out of the erroneous 164,280 deaths! Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. The other 94% fatalities had 2-3 other serious primary illnesses (like diagnosed cancer or heart disease) with the overwhelming majority were of very advanced age. (Over 85 years of age as shown in Table 1 on the red line in the graph) Please check out the CDC link below for verifying the truth about COVID-19 as seen from their own produced Tables 1, 2 and 3! This whole COVID-19 Worldwide Pandemic has truly been a HUGE fraud perpetuated upon the entire human race! COVID-19 is NOT a Pandemic but a Plannedemic! orchestrated by some very 'Bad Actors' who have a 'GOD COMPLEX' and who only care about themselves! Their slogan should be 'NO LIVES MATTER' except theirs! https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#Comorbidities Now my question to you is this - Can YOU Handle the Truth and then open your mouth and save yourself and your love ones from the real agenda behind COVID-19 - the mass execution of over 7 billion people by chemical, biological and electromagnetic poisoning?
- Does a Cloth or Surgical Mask Provide Protection Against Chemical or Biological Pollutants?
Dr Robert O. Young https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/does-a-cloth-or-surgical-mask-provide-protection-against-pollutants?utm_campaign=f2292a84-cd8b-4cb2-bdad-743017065a22&utm_source=so&utm_medium=mail&cid=2f5bf5a4-ab83-47b5-8036-b6279dcd98f3 The pores or opening sizes in cloth and surgical masks range from 80 to 500 microns, which is much larger than particular matter (PM) in the nano micro range such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen cyanide(HCN), titanium dioxide (TiO2), aluminum dioxide, carbon dioxide (CO2)l, bacteria, or even bacterphages or exosomes sometimes referred to the virus. Therefore, any of the above cloth or surgical masks are useless and provide no possible protection against PM less than 80 microns and nothing in the nano micron range.(See Figure 1) Figure 1 - Biologicals and Chemicals Based Upon Size The filtering efficiency of all six of the above selected masks may potentially filter out PM larger than 80 microns such as pollen, dust or hair. Based upon the sizes of bacteria, yeast, molds, endotoxins, bateriophages, exosomes (so-called viruses), carbon monoxide emissions and factory emissions of nitrogen dioxide, hydrogen cyanide, aluminum dioxide, including electrical and magnetic fields (EMF), cloth and surgical masks provide absolutely NO filtering efficiency of PM smaller than 80 microns due to their larger open pores present in all cloth and surgical masks. (See Figure 2 - A through F are cloth masks and G through I are surgical masks) Figure 2 - Using Bright Field Microscopy at 100x You Can See the Open Pores Ranging From 9 to over 500 microns. The Scale Bar in Micrograph A is 500 Microns Surface Characterization The representative bright fieldmicroscopy images of different CMs and SMs are shown in Figure 2. Out of 20 CMs (CM1-CM20) imaged, for brevity, images of CM1, CM3, CM7, CM9, CM12, CM18 are shown in A, B, C, D, E, and F, respectively. The bright patches in the bright field microscopy images are the pores present in the masks. All CMs viewed contained two ply (layers) and the surface characteristics of both layers was very similar. For comparison, you can view the surface of seven different brands of paper/SMs masks available on the market. The SM masks examined contained two or three layers (two or three ply). The surface morphology of the inner, middle, and outer layers of a three ply SM is shown in Figure 2 G, H and I. These micrographs showed a mean range of pores for the CM and the SM from 81 to 461 microns. Conclusion Based upon viewing and measuring the pore sizes of the CM and the SM using bright field microscopy at 100x magnification both types of masks were found to be incapable of filtering PM smaller than 81 microns. Because of the size ranges of PM9[see Figure 4], such as tobacco smoke, bacteria, yeast, mold, endotoxins, mycotoxins, exotoxins, exosomes, bacteriophages, air pollutants of nitrogen dioxide, hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, aluminum dioxide, EMF, etc. the wearing of a cloth or surgical mask provides no protection from disease causing chemical, biological, electrical or magnetic pollution.[See Figure 3] Figure 4 - Showing Particulate Matter (PM) Measuring From 0.001 Nano Microns to 10,000 Microns Additional Questions 1. What type of mask will I need to wear in order to protect myself from small micro particles and even smaller nana particles? 2. Will social distancing provide protection against small micro and even smaller nano particulate matter? The answer is no because micro and nano particles are all around us, especially in the larger cities where you find elevated PM from increased amounts of chemical, biological, electrical and magnetic pollution (EMF). A Mask nor Social Distancing will NOT Protect YOU From High Levels of Micro and Nano Toxic/Acidic Micro and Nano Particulate Matter Found Daily in New York City, New York