top of page

Search Results

3699 items found for ""

  • Researchers urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on mRNA injections in a newly released science paper

    https://expose-news.com/2024/01/26/researchers-urge-a-global-moratorium-on-mrna/ In a paper published on Wednesday, researchers re-analysed the Pfizer covid “vaccine” phase 3 trial data and found more serious adverse events among those in the vaccine group. This is not what published reports from Pfizer’s phase 3 trials said.  “Many key trial findings were either misreported or omitted entirely from published reports,” the researchers said. Seven researchers – M. Nathaniel Mead, Stephanie Seneff, Russ Wolfinger, Jessica Rose, Kris Denhaerynck, Steve Kirsch and Peter A. McCullough – set out to re-analyse Pfizer’s trial data because: our understanding of covid vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts; and, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of the pivotal phase 3 trials have emerged. On Wednesday, they published their findings in a peer-reviewed papertitled ‘Covid-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign’. The paper was published in Cureus, a journal of medical science. “Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group,” the researchers wrote. Adding, “Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, haematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders.” The EUA the researchers are referring to is the authorisation granted to Pfizer by the US Food and Drugs Administration (“FDA”). As the paper noted, Pfizer’s covid “vaccines” never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing according to previously established scientific standards.  It goes on to detail the absolute risk reduction, the underreporting of harms during trials, the shifting narratives and illusions of protection, quality control and manufacturing process-related impurities, the biological mechanisms underlying adverse events (“AEs”) and why, based on how our immune systems work, the vaccine is ineffective. Concluding their comprehensive review, the researchers wrote: Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered. Mead M, Seneff S, Wolfinger R, et al. (January 24, 2024) COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign. Cureus 16(1): e52876. doi:10.7759/cureus.52876 The paper noted that the gene therapy products (“GTPs”) vaccine platform has been studied for over 30 years as an experimental cancer treatment, with the terms “gene therapy” and “mRNA vaccination” often used interchangeably. “Although we employ the terms ‘vaccine’ and ‘vaccination’ throughout this paper, the covid-19 mRNA products are also accurately termed gene therapy products (GTPs) because, in essence, this was a case of GTP technology being applied to vaccination,” they wrote. As such,  throughout their analysis, the terms “vaccines” and “vaccinations” are used interchangeably with injections, inoculations, biologicals, or simply, products. The following are some excerpts from the paper.  You can read the full paper HERE. Serious Harms Revealed after EUA was Granted In this narrative review, we revisit the registrational trials and review analyses of the AEs from these trials and other relevant studies. Most of the revelations have only recently come to light, due to the past few years of extensive censorship of healthcare professionals and research scientists who challenged the prevailing narrative set forth by the vaccine enterprise. Despite the rhetoric, no large randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trials have ever demonstrated reductions in SARS-CoV-2 transmission, hospitalisation or death. The study designs for the pivotal trials that led to the EUA were never intended to determine whether the mRNA inoculations could help prevent severe disease or premature death. It was only after the EUA that the serious biological consequences of rushing the trials became evident, with numerous cardiovascular, neurological, reproductive, haematological, malignant, and autoimmune SAEs identified and published in the peer-reviewed medical literature. Moreover, the covid mRNA vaccines produced via Process 1 and evaluated in the trials were not the same products eventually distributed worldwide; all of the covid-19 mRNA products released to the public were produced via Process 2 and have been shown to have varying degrees of DNA contamination. The process-related impurities were absent from the covid-19 mRNA products used in the registrational trials. Virtually all doses used in those trials originated from “clinical batches” produced using what is known as Process 1.  As a post-authorisation emergency supply measure for global distribution, however, a method much more suitable for mass production known as Process 2 was devised utilising bacterial plasmid DNA. The failure of regulatory authorities to heretofore disclose process-related impurities (e.g., SV40) has further increased concerns regarding safety and quality control oversight of mRNA vaccine manufacturing processes. Incentives Played a Key Role in Undermining Scientific Evaluation Political and financial incentives may have played a key role in undermining the scientific evaluation process leading up to the EUA. Before the pandemic, the US National Institutes of Health invested $116 million (35%) in mRNA vaccine technology, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”) had invested $148 million (44%), while the Department of Defence (“DOD”) contributed $72 million (21%) to mRNA vaccine development. BARDA and the DOD also collaborated closely in the co-development of Moderna’s mRNA vaccine, dedicating over $18 billion, which included guaranteed vaccine purchases. This entailed pre-purchasing hundreds of millions of mRNA vaccine doses, alongside direct financial support for the clinical trials and the expansion of Moderna’s manufacturing capabilities. Once the pandemic began, $29.2 billion – 92% of which came from US public funds – was dedicated to the purchase of covid-19 mRNA products; another $2.2 billion (7%) was channelled into supporting clinical trials, and $108 million (less than 1%) was allocated for manufacturing and basic research. Using US taxpayer money to purchase so many doses in advance would suggest that, before the EUA process, US federal agencies were strongly biased toward successful outcomes for the registrational trials. Established Vaccine Testing Period Abolished Before the rapid authorisation process, no vaccine had been permitted for market release without undergoing a testing period of at least four years. Previous timeframes for phase 3 trial testing averaged 10 years. Health departments have stated that 10-15 years is the normal timeframe for evaluating vaccine safety. The previously established 10-15-year timeframe for clinical evaluation of vaccines was deemed necessary to ensure adequate time for monitoring the development of AEs such as cancers and autoimmune disorders. Pfizer’s covid vaccine completed the process in seven months. Established Safety Standards Abolished With the covid vaccines, safety was never assessed in a manner commensurate with previously established scientific standards, as numerous safety testing and toxicology protocols typically followed by the FDA were sidestepped. Historical accounts bear witness to instances where vaccines were prematurely introduced to the market under immense pressure, only to reveal disabling or even fatal AEs later on. Examples include the 1955 contamination of polio vaccines, instances of Guillain-Barré syndrome observed in flu vaccine recipients in 1976, and the connection between narcolepsy and a specific flu vaccine in 2009. Against this backdrop, it is not surprising that so many medical and public health experts voiced concerns about covid mRNA vaccines bypassing the normal safety testing process. Concerns about inadequate safety testing extend beyond the usual regulatory approval standards and practices. As there were no specific regulations at the time of the rapid approval process, regulatory agencies quickly “adapted” the products, generalised the definition of “vaccine” to accommodate them, and then authorised them for EUA for the first time ever against a viral disease. Due to the GTPs’ reclassification as vaccines, none of their components have been thoroughly evaluated for safety. The main concern, in a nutshell, is that the covid mRNA products may transform body cells into viral protein factories that have no off-switch – i.e., no built-in mechanism to stop or regulate such proliferation – with the spike protein (“S-protein”) being generated for prolonged periods, causing chronic, systemic inflammation and immune dysfunction. When the S-protein enters the bloodstream and disseminates systemically, it may become a contributing factor to diverse AEs in susceptible people. Enforce a Global Moratorium Given the well-documented SAEs and unacceptable harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse and enforce a global moratorium on these modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.

  • Happy Australia Day to All. Live by our ways or LEAVE

    The truth of Australia Day.... This information was authored by Peter Lee - it should be taught to all Australians. 'Below is the reason Australia day is celebrated on 26 January 1. Australia Day does not celebrate the arrival of the first fleet or the invasion of anything 2. Captain Cook did not arrive in Australia on the 26th January. The landing of Captain Cook in Sydney happened on the 28th April 1770 – not on 26th January. 3. The first fleet arrived in Botany Bay on 18th January. The 26th was chosen as Australia Day for a very different and important reason. The 26th of January is the day Australians received their independence from British Rule. However, Captain Cook’s landing was included in Australian bi-centenary celebrations of 1988 when Sydney-siders decided Captain Cook’s landing should become the focus of the Australia Day commemoration. Sadly the importance of this date for all Australians has begun to fade and now a generation later, it is all but lost. The media as usual is happy to twist the truth for the sake of controversy. Captain Cook didn’t land on the 26th January, so changing the date of any celebration of Captain Cook’s landing would not have any impact on Australia Day, but maybe it would clear the way for the truth about Australia Day. Australians of today abhor what was done under British governance to the Aborigines, the Irish and many other cultures around the world. So after the horrors of WW11, we decided to try and fix it. We became our own people. On 26th January 1949, the Australian nationality came into existence when the Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948 was enacted. That was the day we were first called Australians and allowed to travel with passports as Australians and NOT British subjects. In 1949 therefore, we all became Australian citizens under the Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948. Before that special date, all people living in Australia, including Aborigines, were called ‘British Subjects’ and forced to travel on British passports and fight in British wars. This is why we celebrate Australia Day on the 26th January. This was the day Australians became free to make our own decisions about which wars we would fight and how our citizens would be treated. It was the day we were all declared Australians. Until this date,Aborigines were not protected by law For the first time since Captain Cook’s landing this new Act gave Aboriginal Australians the full protection of Australian Law. This is why 26th January is the day new Australians receive their citizenship It is a day which celebrates the implementation of the Nationality of Citizenship Act of 1948 –The Act which gave freedom and protection to the first Australians and gives all Australians, old and new, the right to live under the protection of the Australian Law”, united as one nation. What was achieved that day is something for which all Australians can be proud. Isn’t it time therefore that all Australians were taught the real reason we celebrate Australia Day on 26th January? In one way or another, we are ALL descendants of Australia ALL OF US. So we should ALL be celebrating and giving thanks for the freedoms, the lifestyles and opportunities that we currently enjoy, thanks to the strengths and battles of our ancestors’.

  • CHEMTRAILS: NASAs 1985 Document ☣️ Lithium & Barium Releases into the Atmosphere

    https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/chemtrails-nasas-1985-document-lithium?publication_id=1865725&post_id=138171694&isFreemail=false&r=18xl84 The United States, Germany and United Kingdom teamed up to spam the sky with chemicals to make fake comets and artificial auroras. Oh, and they also wanted to see if it BLOCKS THE SUN... Although they tell us, “Chemtrails aren’t real”, and, “the government isn’t intentionally releasing anything into the sky”, almost 40 years ago, NASA published a document called Astronautics and Aeronautics for 1985, which outlined the creation of their program that intentionally released chemicals into the sky... the exact same chemicals that are still coming down in our rain water and snow… because they are still being intentionally released… by the government… into the sky. Duh. I just finished writing a 4-part series about NASA. In this series we asked, How Fake is NASA?, then looked at almost 60 YEARS of Space propaganda leading up to the first space venture in history. In the second part of the series we looked at The NASA PSYOP and tried to locate 1 real photograph of outer space. Part 3 was called How to Fake Space, and showed NASA’s CGI glitches, harnesses, green screens and more. In the grand finale to the series we examined Who is NASA and Why would they Lie? All of this evidence, combined together, leads us to ask, “If they’re not going to Space, WTF is $25+ billion (in tax dollars) PER YEAR BEING SPENT ON?”. Perhaps we can answer that today. In this very boring 568-page document you will learn how NASA began working with worldwide governments to study the creation of artificial clouds and comets using, quote, “payloads” of Lithium and Barium dispersed into the sky. Yeah, they’re toxic. Yes, Lithium is a drug used to treat bipolar disorder and to make batteries (huh? Medicine and batteries, you say?), and NASA is the largest investor in Lithium (and helium), and sure, they were released into the sky, but it’s 100% safe because our governments would never, ever release dangerous chemicals into the air we breathe, and even if they did, “Chemtrails are a hoax”, they tell me. BLOCKING THE SUN WITH CHEMICALS IN THE 1980s After spending years studying the suns rays and the impact chemicals have on blocking them, it was time for the joint-collaboration experiments to officially begin. The objective of the first experiment was to learn about vapor expansion from atmospheric chemical releases and specifically, to learn what impact these chemicals will have on the suns radiation. In laymen’s terms, this means, “let’s spray sh*t into the sky to block that thing that emits light”. In the first experiment NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility, located in Virginia USA, launched a sounding rocket carrying a 157 pound (71.8 kg) payload: The payload was “balls of greenish-white titanium-boron-barium and barium-cupric-oxide”, which the sounding rocket released when it hit an altitude of 230 miles. The scientists were delighted to see that the barium clouds rapidly expanded, while ejecting barium ions everywhere. The cloud formed “a visible streak more than 62 miles long” (100 km). A second experiment involved releasing red titanium-boron-lithium. Yummy. These chemicals were released at 325 miles and expanded to a diameter of several hundred kilometers IN LESS THAN ONE MINUTE (300km = 186 mi… in under 60 seconds…). Goddard Space Flight Center‘s Wallops Range Control Center received reports of cloud sightings from as far north as Maine and as far south as North Carolina and Indiana. That is a massive f*cking “cloud”, from a single release: …Now imagine if you had 4 releases at the same time… that sure would block a lot of sun, across the whole nation, now wouldn’t it?… The next experiment was to create man-made comets. For this project, the United States, West Germany, and the United Kingdom joined forces to inject lithium and barium into the atmosphere. The scientists claimed that although it was a cloudy day, the comet was a success and the chemical “tail” of the chemical comet spanned up to 12,427 miles in length (20,000 km). CHEMICAL + TRAIL = “CHEMTRAIL”. Germany then began testing the release of other chemicals to create even longer comets, because if there’s one thing the German people want their tax dollars spent on, it's not Oktoberfest, a plate of schnitzel or a pint of Hefferveisen, it’s the government popping off fake comets by spamming their sky with toxins. NASA then announced that it awarded a $145.8 million contract to General Electric for development of the upper atmosphere research observatory, called UARS, because everything government-related needs a stupid 3-to-4 letter name. Oh, and also, if you’re wondering why the F the number is so strange, like why is it $145.8 million instead of $146 million? Well, if you’re into that number stuff, $145.8 = 1+4+5+8 = 18 18 is 6 + 6 + 6 … so 145.8 is 666 For more on that topic, read my post, NASA: Freemasons in Space. Shortly thereafter, NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, working with Germany, tag-teamed a large Barium release. Germany discovered that this release was successful, that it changed the earths magnetic field. YAY! Maybe you’re like, “Agent, what exactly happens when the earth magnetic field changes?”, to which I reply, “Not much sweetheart, other than magnetic compasses not working and species of birds, bees, insects, animals and sea life that rely on the magnetic field to navigate cannot make it home with food to feed their families so they are senselessly slaughtered, other than, not much, but did you see that comet?” Perhaps this is a good time for me to tell you about Barium Inhalation? BARIUM INHALATION Barium is a Toxic Heavy Metal. Symptoms of Barium poisoning include: Cardiac irregularities Tremors Weakness Anxiety Dyspnea Paralysis Gastrointestinal disturbances (diarrhea, IBS) Muscle weakness neurodegenerative diseases High blood pressure (hypertension) Cardiovascular disease Breast Cancer Multiple sclerosis (MS) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) Hypokalemia (Health condition with insufficient potassium in blood) Covid They have been studying the health ramifications of Barium Nanoparticles in air and how it impacts rats…I wonder why? Seems like an odd thing to randomly choose to study, doesn’t it? After only 24 months, particles were permanently lodged in the rats lungs. Because of the irreversible harm done to the rats, they were euthanized at the end of the 24-month study. Thank goodness, we would never want any form of life to be forced to live with Barium Inhalation damage to their lungs! That would be inhumane! Barium, when released into the atmosphere, can be a greenish color if burned / ignited. If released as raw particles, it is white: Barium and strontium, when combined, can create “pretty Auroras”: When you shoot off those cool-looking green fireworks, you are literally helping the government chemtrail the sky. I beg you to not shoot fireworks. It is not patriotic, it’s evil. These chemicals help block the sun, kill the insects, poison the air, contaminate the soil and poison the water. That’s why there’s not a peep from all the FAKE “Save the Earth” organizations who are funded by the same organizations they allegedly police. We will discuss this in much more detail in the future, because this too is a deep, sad, sh*tty rabbit hole: Now let’s get back to NASA: At this point in time, we are still in the early 1980s, and NASA is loving their chemmies so much that now they wanted to know if they could release chemicals that would not be noticeable by an observer on the ground, because that’s not suspicious AF or anything. An absolutely massive barium release and two gigantic lithium releases then occurred. All of the ground stations, except the one in Argentina, reported clear weather. The Arizona ground station stated that it did see the chemicals, but only briefly. The chemicals were only visual with the naked eye for about 20 minutes. This meant that now NASA knew chemicals could be released without public observation, or, at worst, a very short observation period. More lithium releases and fake comets followed. Awesome. Lithium, when released into the sky, is often a reddish-color that can also appear orange or pink. Sorry for ruining “beautiful sunsets” They claim this is just a stunning, rare natural phenomenon, but congressional testimony proves otherwise, check out my Substack post about it. The title is Chemtrails Testimony: GeoEnginnering means no more blue skies, only white… with magnificent, colorful sunsets. Still in the early 1980s, Johns Hopkins Physics Lab, who would later become a pillar of the military GeoEngineering program, scored a government a contract with NASA to build the rockets and crafts that would be used to release further chemicals. The Germans then released two Barium Canisters to create another artificial comet. A third release was a combination of Barium and Lithium. It was during these experiments that a discovery was made, that discovery was, if these chemicals were released at 70,000 feet or higher, the chemicals would not appear on satellite imaging. Now they knew that, not only could the public not see their chemicals, but they have a way for them to not appear on satellite either. Spray and deny. Can I make a quick point really fast? If “satellites” are machines in “space”, as shown in NASAs artist renderings, why is it that the chemicals will not appear on satellite when they are high up in the atmosphere? Shouldn’t they appear better if they are closer to the f*cking space satellite? For more on NASA Fakery, read my 4-part series that absolutely shatters the illusion. In the final phase of this experiment, researchers used two balloons, each large enough to enclose an entire football field, to lift scientific payloads into the atmosphere. All we know is that this was labeled a success, and the first phase of the tri-country partnership studies were marked “Completed”. NASA LOVES RELEASING CHEMICALS Even prior to the 1980’s, NASA was releasing chem-chems all over the place. Here’s a 1971 newspaper article about Barium releases: In 1978, a 36‐pound barium payload was ejected 20,000 miles above Central America, as well as Alaska: 2013, the military publicly states it will be making Auroras using HAARP. These Auroras also require chemicals. Which makes me wonder, is there such thing as a real Aurora? Or have they all been chemically induced? 2015, NASA released chemicals all over the east coast of the USA 2017, “clouds of barium, strontium and cupric-oxide vapor” were released over the east coast of the USA to create “Bright Artificial Clouds”: Another project in 2017 lasted from February 13th through March 3rd. This operation formed artificial clouds by deploying trimethyl aluminum (TMA): You can see a TMA release video here: https://m.facebook.com/AGU-Climate-315727311921252/videos/trimethyl-aluminum-gas-clouds-released-by-the-first-of-three-rockets-launched-as/2683059681797226/ Inhaling TMA can cause skin irritation, burning eyes, burning / sore throat, coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath. The good news is, the government can say it doesn’t cause cancer, reproductive issues or other long-term effects because it has never been tested: BUT, the government does know you should always wear a respirator when working with it, and if it ever comes in contact with your eyes or skin, you need to seek medical attention. If you ever inhale it “transfer promptly to a medical facility”: Also, the media and CDC assure us that these releases are safe, because, “there is no harm to humans when it is in the atmosphere”… they accidentally forgot to explain the harms when it comes down in rain and snow… the weird snow that doesn’t melt: (41 second video) In 2018, NASA secured a 13,500 acre-area, surrounded by a 125,000-acre buffer zone in the wetlands of Mississippi, where they built the John C. Stennis Space Center (SSC). This is a special place for the testing rocket engines. The combustion of the engine materials create large clouds of steam that exceed 6,000 °F. The steam rises after the engine test and cools in the air, forming a cloud that floats over the city and can create rain nearby. In case you missed it, tax dollars paid for wetlands to be obtained for the purpose of shooting off chemicals around them. Once again, where are all the eco-activists? 2021: NASA released, “Two of the payloads of barium vapor clouds in the upper atmosphere” Look how far these chemicals spread in two minutes. Covered my entire state of Michigan: There’s thousands of known experiments. 2023: To this day, NASA openly admits that it is releasing Aluminum (TMA), Lithium and Barium into the atmosphere and that these chemicals create “trails”: So, that’s the story of the 1980’s NASA document, which clearly outlines that they were doing exactly what we say they are currently doing, yet we are labeled Conspiracy Theorists for simply saying, “the government is doing exactly what the government was doing, and openly admits to currently doing”. SO, IF THEY’RE NOT GOING TO SPACE, WTF ARE THEY DOING? We still need to answer the question, “If they aren’t going to Space, what is $25+ BILLION per year being spent on?” Well, in a document from 2010, which we will be discussing this year, they outlined the Chemtrail program cost, in great detail. They listed cost as $1.1 billion annually for a fleet of 24 Boeing planes, which would be stationed at military bases, then fly a total of 48 flights per day: … and that cost is for only two dozen planes, based on 2010 monetary value. After NASA’s costs of operations, how much of the $26 billion is left over? Let’s guess $15 billion, maybe more? For $15 billion, you can operate over 300 planes per day, each making two flights. That equals 600 spray missions per day, which would fit with this: Remember, even though NASA is being sold to us as a Space program, NASA stands for “National Aeronautics and Space Administration”… Aeronautics is airplanes…

  • NEW - 25 Republican governors issue a joint statement in support of Texas in its border dispute with the federal government.

    https://www.disclose.tv/id/awss3p7o9i/ Interesting that states run by cabalists all rally for a good cause and support the Constitution (which they never do otherwise) ... Looks more like they are putting together a planned civil war.

  • Is NASA’s ‘Temperatures Are Rising’ graph evidence of global warming or evidence of widespread fraud?

    https://expose-news.com/2024/01/25/nasas-temperatures-are-rising-graph/ “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” – Upton Sinclair This statement holds particularly true in the field of climate science, says Tony Heller. On NASA’s website is a tab labelled “Facts.”  Clicking on “Facts” displays various menu options alongside a quote from the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPPC”): “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.” The term “climate system” is vague and subject to the occasional reinterpretation as required.  But on another webpage, NASA is more specific. ‘Scientific Consensus: Earth’s Climate is Warming’ is the title of the webpage listing selected quotes from selected institutions, including two from the IPPC On another webpage, NASA shows a graph titled ‘A World of Agreement: Temperatures Are Rising’.  The graph depicts the latest annual temperatures from 5 different research groups, working independently. “Collectively, the past five years are the warmest years in the modern record,” NASA states. In a short video titled ‘‘Imaginary Heat Record’, Heller discusses the graph above. “The [lines] show five different [research] groups which have generated nearly identical graphs from 1880 to the present,” he said. Showing NASA’s map of the world where temperature data is collected from, Heller said: “NASA uses this map to convince people that they have very good global coverage of the temperature record but unfortunately this is propaganda, not reality.” For temperatures in 1880, there are temperature records from only a few areas and so there is very little coverage of the Earth, Heller explained. “Almost none in Africa and very little in Asia,” he said. Data for 1880 from the UK’s Climatic Research Unit doesn’t fare any better.   “They have none from the southern hemisphere,” he said. “This coverage [of 1880 data] is grossly inadequate to calculate a global temperature,” Heller said. “The only plausible explanation for the close agreement in these graph [lines] is that these different [research] groups are not independent at all, [the researchers are] actually colluding to produce the same graph,” he said. “[The] graph [above] is not evidence of global warming.  Rather, it’s evidence of widespread fraud.” Heller then turned to recent temperature records.  He explained how the urban heat island effect corrupts the entire temperature record using the example of Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (“DRC’s”) capital and one of the largest cities in the world. “[The] urban heat island at Kinshasa corrupts the entire DRC temperature record,” he said. “These five [lines on the] graph are fake at both ends.  Most academic climate science assumes the accuracy of this graph.  Billions of taxpayer dollars are diverted into climate academia to produce meaningless reports based on fake data.” Tony Heller: Imaginary Record Heat, 24 January 2024 (5 mins) If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it on Odysee HERE. Tony Heller is an American lifelong environmentalist. He has degrees in geology and electrical engineering and has worked on design teams for many of the world’s most complex designs, including some which likely power your personal computer. He has also worked as a contract software developer on climate and weather models for the US government.  He publishes articles on the website Real Climate Science and uploads videos on his YouTube channel HERE.

  • Moment innocent civilian brandishing white flag in Gaza 'safe zone' is shot dead | ITV News

    The English-speaking man lamented the fact that having fled Gaza City when this war began, the family were now running away again, this time abandoning Khan Younis to head for Rafah. Their attempts to escape the war have taken them from the top of the Gaza Strip to the bottom. They are among hundreds of thousands of people hemmed in, with their backs to the Egyptian border and the IDF bearing down. “Nowhere is safe in Gaza,” he told a cameraman working for ITV News.

  • BRETT SUTTON AUSTRALIA DAY AWARD

    Former chief health officer Brett Sutton, a leading musical director and the boss of the state’s zoos are among the Victorian recipients celebrated for their achievements in the 2024 Australia Day honours.⁠ https://t.me/daveoneegsauschat/32811

  • Top 4 conspiracy theories about 5G that are coming true

    https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-01-24-4-conspiracy-theories-about-5g-coming-true.html The price we pay for high-speed internet is terrifying. The longer we spend time on our Smart Phones, near Smart Meters and around 5G antennas, the more we sacrifice the very health of our cells, our mitochondria, our DNA. When 5G was first introduced in 2019, there was fierce controversy over the ill effects of electromagnetic radiation, and "conspiracy theories" emerged. In 2017, doctors and scientists petitioned against the 5G rollout in the EU due to potential cancer risks. Today, more independent scientists are documenting evidence that radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) pose harmful biological effects on every cell in the body, damaging the mitochondria (the powerhouse of the cell). This grave reality has led an entire city (Vaud in Switzerland) and an entire nation (Belgium) to place a moratorium on new 5G installations. More cities around the world are beginning to view 5G antennas as a source of environmental pollution. Here are four conspiracy theories about 5G that are coming true: One: 5G amplifies EMF damage by forming free radicals EMFs indirectly damage DNA by activating the body’s voltage gated calcium channels (VGCCs). Dr. Martin Pall’s research shows that EMFs cause VGCC’s to release excess calcium ions into the cells, leading to nitric oxide and superoxide formations that react further to form peroxynitrite and other free radicals. These free radicals, especially the peroxynitrite, damages DNA and hinders fertility, brain function and heart health. 5G is a silent catalyst for oxidative damage to the cells and a precursor to immunodeficiency, which has become all-too common in the population. Two: Smart Meters maximize EMF pulses, doing greater damage to the body Smart Meters emit pulsed wave radiation, letting off EMF bursts that come in rapid start-stop cycles throughout the day. Utility companies such as Pacific Gas and the Electric Company of California have testified in court that smart meters are pulsating waves between 9,600 to 190,000 times per day. Pulsed wave radiation is much different than continuous wave radiation. There are now 13 studies that point to pulse wave EMFS being more active and dangerous than continuous wave EMFs. These pulses put stress on the cells of the body. Essentially, Smart Meters are designed to do maximum EMF damage to the body. Three: EMF penetration from Smart Phones causes negative effects deep within the body According to the telecom industry, EMFs from Smart Phones only affect the outer 1 cm of the body. Users are warned not to wear devices directly on the skin. However, according to independent scientists, the damage to the body goes much deeper and penetrates the human brain, the heart and the endocrine system. EMFs can alter enzyme activity, leading to decline in sperm motility. Professor Hässig and his colleagues in Switzerland found an association between greater levels of oxidative stress and the number of 5G transmitters within a 100-to-199-meter distance. In the study, calves suffered various degrees of nuclear cataract, but the cataracts were more prominent when the calves were more readily exposed to 5G antennas. There was a relationship between the location of calves expressing nuclear cataracts in the first trimester of gestation and the strength of 5G antennas nearby. Four: Manipulating humans by using their sweat ducts as antennae In the article, 5G and IoT: Total Technological Control Grid Being Rolled Out Fast, scientist Dr. Ben-Ishai wrote about 5G’s ability to exploit the body’s sweat ducts. According to Dr. Ben Ishai, 5G networks broadcast frequencies that access human sweat ducts, as if they are antennae. He found that the sweat ducts work like helical antennas, absorbing electromagnetic energy between 75-100GHz. “If you changed the character of the sweat duct, i.e. made it work, you could actually change that absorption at some point, and if you could do that you could trace how a person is under stress,” he says. According to researcher Mark Steele, 5G is equipped with a dielectric lens and can be used as a weapons system, much like long range radar and directed energy. “5G is a weapons system, nothing more, nothing less. It’s got nothing to do with telecommunications for humans. 5G is a machine-to-machine connection for autonomous vehicles.” The push for 5G has created a vast network of antenna that expose people continuously to electromagnetic radiation. Smart devices are bringing new EMF exposures into people’s daily lives at an increasing rate. The biological effects of 5G, as outlined by independent studies, are being ignored. The repercussions of this will be felt for many years to come. Limiting one’s exposure is important, but many exposures are inevitable, which is why it’s important to intake foods and supplements like NAC that are high in antioxidants.

  • Scottish farmers’ protest: “Farmers are getting pushed to the limit – We’ve had enough”

    https://expose-news.com/2024/01/25/scottish-farmers-protest-weve-had-enough/ In the Scottish countryside, the rallying cry “It’s happening” echoes as farmers join the wave of protests happening across Europe. Their grievances are diverse, but the common thread is dissatisfaction with the status quo. For the Scottish farmers, the protest was about restrictions being placed on farmers relating to Cairngorms National Park.  What sparked the protest was a scheme to re-introduce beavers in the area which was done without consultation. “The park provides control more than aid to those living and working in the area,” a farmers’ representative said. Joseph Stalin called the Ukrainian farmers “enemies of the state.”  As History noted in a 2019 article, the Soviet Union dictator wanted both to replace Ukraine’s small farms with state-run collectives and punish independence-minded Ukrainians who posed a threat to his totalitarian authority.  By expropriating the farms, the state took control of food production. As a result, an estimated 3.9 – 7 million starved to death. History quoted Alex de Waal who said: “The Ukrainian famine was a clear case of a man-made famine.”  He described it as “a hybrid…of a famine caused by calamitous social-economic policies and one aimed at a particular population for repression or punishment.” Now, 100 years later, governments across Europe are targeting farmers primarily in the name of “climate change.”  The result? As history has proved, a man-made famine. It’s not clear when the Scottish protest shown in the videos below took place, the location or the reasons the farmers and their supporters decided to take action.   Those who have been sharing the videos on social media have not provided these details.  However, The Scottish Farmer reported a protest held in Grantown-on-Spey on Monday 15 January at the headquarters of Cairngorms National Park Authority (“CNPA”). “They rallied 21 tractors, a Unimog truck, and Land Rovers through Grantown before a meeting took place with CNPA board members,”  The Scottish Farmer wrote. This description appears to fit the vehicles that can be seen driving through a Scottish town in the first of the videos below, which may indicate this is the same protest.  In the third video, the farmer can be heard discussing rules being imposed on farmers for the sake of the national park, which would also seem to indicate it is the protest described by The Scottish Farmers’ article. The protest in Grantown-on-Spey was over the lack of engagement regarding the re-introduction of beavers into the area. Cairngorms National Park was established in 2003.  In 2010, the area of the park was extended.  Within the national park, many areas have conservation designations: there are 19 Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protection Areas and 46 Sites of Special Scientific Interest. Roughly 18,000 people reside within the park. National Farmers Union Highland regional manager Ian Wilson said: “The fact that the Cairngorms Park has not delivered and worked with farmers and crofters is a concern, as the government considered setting out even more national parks.  The park provides control more than aid to those living and working in the area.” Robert MacDonald is the chairman of the Cairngorms Crofters and Farmers Group and a local farmer from Grantown-on-Spey.  He said the protest followed long-running concerns. “The promises we received 20 years ago were of benefit to the agricultural community. Yet the focus of the park is on conservation and rewilding, this is secluding farmers.” “They seem to have a conservation policy which is not taking into account the crofters, farmers and land managers in the national park unless they are fully committed to rewilding,” he said. “It was the beaver release that brought it all to a head because it was really done without consultation to the land managers directly,” he added.  “As seen on the River Spey with the re-introduction of beavers, this is negatively affecting people’s livelihoods.” He also highlighted that the government views the park as a “carbon-clearance.” “We need to consider where our food comes from,” MacDonald said. Below are three videos being shared on social media regarding the Scottish farmers’ protest. Source: Gareth Wyn Jones on Twitter “We’ve tried hard to do what the government has said but they keep asking for more [and] giving us less,” the farmer in the video below said. “Farmers are getting pushed to the limit – we’ve had enough.” Source: Peter Sweden on Twitter James Melville tweeted the video below with the comment: “This Scottish farmer expresses his concerns about how the government are neglecting the concerns of farmers. It’s time for governments to support one of the most vital industries of them all – farming. Our food supply depends on it.” Source: James Melville on Twitter The Scottish farmers have joined the German, French, Italian, Romanian, Polish and Lithuanian farmers. European farmers, as in one voice, say that the green policies and taxes are taking them to the very edge of bankruptcy, in what becomes in all practical terms a “manufactured famine.” The local demands vary, but they all claim to be taking the hardest hit from environmental reforms, and therefore they need more government subsidies to offset them. To ensure farming is preserved, farmers in some countries are taking matters a step further.  The Dutch farmers have created their own political party and it’s doing well in the polls.  The Irish farmers have also established a political party, called the Farmers Alliance, and are preparing to make an impact in the upcoming local and European Union elections this summer. Further reading: Germany, France, Romania, Poland, Lithuania… Farmers All Over Europe Take a Stand Against Crippling ‘Green’ Policies, The Gateway Pundit, 24 January 2024 In pictures: French farmers block roads, bridges as protests sweep country, France 24, 24 January 2024 ‘We live in continual stress,’ French farmers escalate protests against government over increasing costs, Rebel News, 23 January 2024 Europe’s Unrest: Scottish Farmers Protesting, French Chaos on Train Tracks… Continent in Turmoil! Citizen Watch, 23 January 2024

©2017 by NutriTruth. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page