Search Results

Dr. Jason Dean joins Maria Zeee with crucial information regarding the next stage of the agenda, helping the awake masses to see how far along the globalist plan really is, and how AI plans to hack and own humans and their consciousness. Dr. Dean also discusses the intel he has received about the coming global cyber shut down.

https://vigilantnews.com/post/former-major-city-police-detective-reveals-50-of-sids-cases-happened-within-48-hours-post-vaccine

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/27/bill-gates-suddenly-abandons-climate-doom-narrative/ Bill Gates is suddenly changing his tune and appears to be abandoning the “climate doom” Narrative just as more people see through the climate change façade and realize how their lives are being exploited by globalism. “Gates, author of “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster,” spent the last decade warning audiences that the world is overpopulated and subject to impending climate doom. In order to save the planet, Bill Gates says we must achieve “zero net carbon emissions by the year 2050. Meanwhile, Gates continues to traverse the world in his private jets, spewing more carbon emissions in one year than the average person does in their entire lifetime,” says Lance D Johnson from NewsTarget who authored the following article. Bill Gates Suddenly Abandons Climate Doom Narrative as Populations Push Back Against Globalism As more people see through the climate change façade and realize how their lives are being exploited by globalism, Bill Gates is suddenly changing his tune on the climate doom narrative. During a live speaking event at the Times Center in New York, Gates made a sudden U-turn on his climate doom narrative. He said, “No temperate country is going to become uninhabitable.” Gate’s latest comments are in stark contrast to the public comments he made just two years ago when his book on climate doom was first published. In a 2021 Fox News Sunday interview with Chris Wallace, Bill Gates said, “The migration that we saw out of Syria for their civil war, which was somewhat weather dependent, we’re going to have 10 times as much migration because the equatorial areas will become unlivable.” Now he suddenly believes the opposite is true, and it’s easy to see why he is softening his stance. The fear-driven, end-of-the-world climate change doom narrative is no longer working on the masses, and Gates knows that people see through the manipulation and exploitation, so he is adapting his message. In his most recent public speech, Gates said, “If you try to do climate brute force, you will get people who say, ‘I like climate but I don’t want to bear that cost and reduce my standard of living.’” In other words, Gates knows his climate investments are helping to destroy the standard of living for millions worldwide. The poor and working class are being looted by Bill Gates’ climate change policies The poor and working class are the ones who are most impacted by the globalists’ net zero climate change policies and the Green New Deal energy rationing and money laundering that is taking place globally. The United Nation’s central planning of agriculture and energy production has stifled both, driving up the cost of food and energy and reducing the standard of living for many. Now, populations are pushing back against socialism, green new deals, and the “ESG” (environment, social, and governance) schemes that have infiltrated corporations and governments around the world. These policies have slowed economic growth, increased energy costs, and wasted billions of taxpayer dollars. Fossil fuels still represent approximately 80 percent of U.S. energy production and consumption, so the Biden regime’s attempts to shut pipelines and drilling down has only hurt the poor and working class who depend on affordable energy prices just to get by. In the U.S., the $27 billion “National Climate Bank,” created by Biden’s green new deal, has only led to waste, fraud, abuse and outright socialism. Government central planners (like climate czar John Kerry) are entitled to pick the winners and losers in the economy, stifling market innovation and upending countless jobs and livelihoods. Meanwhile, all this self-destruction of American energy and innovation is making the U.S. more vulnerable to foreign nations like Russia. Russia, not beholden to the UN’s climate change hysteria and population controls, is gaining leverage over the U.S. and Europe with their robust, diversified energy production and transport systems. For these reasons alone, Bill Gates and the green new deal-pushing globalists are out of touch with reality. Not only are they making it harder for the average person to eat, commute to work, and cool/heat their homes, but their delusional policies are also breaking down the sovereignty of nations, making populations more vulnerable and the world less safe in the process. source Lance D, Johnson at Newtarget.

Imagine if you will, everything you've been taught is a lie… This out-of-the-box philosophical proposition proposed by savant Neil Kramer will take you on the most amazing journey of discovery in your life. All you have to do is give it serious consideration. Can you…?

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/26/dtp-vaccines-kill-more-than-they-save/ Earlier this month, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had a conversation with Leah Wilson from Stand for Health Freedom. He told Wilson that the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) has lost its way and it has now become an instrument of China, the Davos billionaires club, the pharmaceutical industry and Big Ag, the big agriculture industry. He then highlighted the DTP vaccination programme: “The last big study done on the DTP vaccines showed that … girls who take the DTP vaccine – which is the most widely administered vaccine in the world because of the WHO – girls who take it are 10 times more likely to die in the next six months than children who don’t take it.” Stand for Health Freedom: Conversations that Unite with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., 17 September 2023 (4 mins) You can watch the full interview from which the clip above was taken HERE. DTP is an acronym for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis. DTaP and Tdap are both combination vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis. The lowercase “d” and “p” indicate smaller concentrations of diphtheria toxoids and pertussis antigens, and “a” in “ap/aP” indicates that the pertussis toxoids are acellular. According to Wikipedia, in 2016, the CDC reported that 80.4% of children in the US have received four or more DTaP vaccinations by 2 years of life. Vaccination rates for children aged 13–17 with one or more Tdap shots was 90.2% in 2019. Only 43.6% of adults (older than 18) have received a Tdap shot in the last 10 years. The CDC aims to increase vaccination rate among 2-year-olds from 80.4% to 90.0%. In the United Kingdom, DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and polio) is called the “3-in-1 teenage booster” and is given by the NHS to all teenagers aged 14. The hexavalent vaccine is given to infants and “provides the first stage of protection” against diphtheria, tetanus, and polio, as well as pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type B and hepatitis B. In France, DTP refers to a diphtheria, tetanus and polio vaccine. It is mandatory and given at 2 months (first dose) and 4 months (second dose) with a booster at 11 months. Subsequent boosters are recommended at ages 6, 11–13, 25, 45, 65, and then every ten years. In the Netherlands, pertussis is known as kinkhoest and DKTP refers to the DTaP-IPV combination vaccine against diphtheria, kinkhoest, tetanus and polio. DTP is given as part of the National Immunisation Programme. According to World Bank data, in 2021 81% of children aged 12 to 23 months worldwide had been injected with a DTP vaccine. In 2019, Dr. Mery Nass wrote the article below about the DTP vaccine study Kennedy mentioned in his interview. There was actually a series of studies conducted over 40 years in Guinea-Bissau which were sponsored by the Danish government. All of the studies showed that DTP-vaccinated babies had much higher overall deaths than unvaccinated children. One study found, as Kennedy stated, that vaccinated girls had 10 times the mortality rate of unvaccinated girls. DTP associated with 2-10 times increased mortality in African babies By Dr. Meryl Nass, 5 March 2019 The following blog post is about something so unbelievable and so terrible it kept me awake most of last night. Here it is: ‘All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis’. A highly respected group of Danish researchers say this after studying the results of vaccinations for many years. This group of Danish physicians and scientists has been studying vaccines in a centre in Guinea Bissau, Africa (and sometimes in other places) since 1979. Their work is widely published and has not been subject to significant criticism of any kind. What they have found, in a series of different studies going back 15 years, is that vaccinating young infants with DTP increases the likelihood of early death from 2 to 10 times expected. Different numbers came up in different studies, but each study found at least a doubling of mortality related to DTP. The researchers have looked at this in a variety of ways but kept getting the same answer: that DTP is associated with significantly increased death rates. They propose that the reason may be that the vaccine makes babies more susceptible to other infections (other than diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) than they would be otherwise. The researchers are so convinced of this effect that they asked WHO to study it further and change the international program to vaccinate with DTP. The WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts did not dispute their data and agreed that randomised trials of DPT needed to be done. But then a decision was made not to do such trials. I have previously blogged on Peter Aaby’s group’s finding of a negative effect on mortality of the DTP vaccine. HERE and below, are the group’s 2017 findings. They have additionally found that live polio vaccines, in contrast to killed DPT vaccines, reduce childhood mortality rates, but not nearly so strongly as the DPT seems to increase them. (Please excuse the confusing jargon and abbreviations, which are explained below.) 4.3. Comparison with Previous Studies of DTP and OPV There is only one other study of the introduction of DTP. In rural Guinea-Bissau, DTP (±OPV) was associated with 2-fold higher mortality (Aaby et al., 2004a). All studies that documented vaccination status and followed children prospectively indicate that DTP has negative effects; a meta-analysis of the eight studies found 2-fold higher mortality for DTP-vaccinated compared with DTP-unvaccinated, mostly BCG-vaccinated controls (Aaby et al., 2016) (Appendix A). The negative effect of DTP was much worse in this natural experiment than has been reported in previous studies of DTP. This is presumably due to the “unvaccinated” control children in previous studies having been a frail subgroup too frail to get vaccinated. Previous studies have not been able to compare DTP-vaccinated children with “normal” controls. Hence, most previous studies have probably underestimated the negative effect of DTP. The potentially differential effects of DTP and OPV have only been examined in few studies. However, we have recently been able to document marked beneficial NSEs of OPV. In an RCT, OPV at birth (OPV0) reduced infant mortality by 32% (0–57%) before the children received campaign-OPV (Lund et al., 2015). In Bissau, campaign-OPV reduced the mortality rate by 19% (5–32%) (submitted). When DTP was missing for several months in Bissau, we showed that the all-cause case-fatality at the paediatric ward was 3-fold lower if the children had OPV-only as their most recent vaccination rather than the recommended combination of DTP and OPV (Aaby et al., 2004b). Thus, OPV may have modified the negative effect of DTP. This pattern was also seen when DTP was first introduced in the rural areas of Guinea-Bissau in 1984 (Aaby et al., 2004a). OPV was not used the first year and the HR for DTP versus unvaccinated was 5.00 (0.63–39.7). In the period from 1985 to 1987, when DTP and OPV were nearly always administered together, the MRR was 1.90 (0.91– 3.97). In the present study, the hazard ratio was 10.0 (2.61–38.6) for DTP-only but 3.52 (0.96–12.9) for children who received DTP and OPV simultaneously (Table 3). Based on these two studies of the introduction of DTP, the HR compared with DTP-unvaccinated children was significantly different for children who had received DTP-only (HR = 8.14 (2.63–15.2)) and for children who received both DTP and OPV (HR = 2.21 (1.16–4.19)) (test of interaction, p = 0.049). Hence, simultaneous administration of DTP and OPV may have alleviated the negative nonspecific effect of DTP. 5. Conclusions DTP was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP. Unfortunately, DTP is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion who receives DTP3 is used globally as an indicator of the performance of national vaccination programs. It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomised trials. All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections. The recently published SAGE review called for randomised trials of DTP (Higgins et al., 2014). However, at the same time, the IVIR-AC committee to which SAGE delegated the follow-up studies of the NSEs of vaccines has indicated that it will not be possible to examine the effect of DTP in an unbiased way. If that decision by IVIR-AC remains unchallenged, the present study may remain the closest we will ever come to an RCT of the NSEs of DTP. [Emphasis added.] The Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis and Oral Polio Vaccine Among Young Infants in an Urban African Community: A Natural Experiment, EBioMedicine, 2017 Key to Abbreviations: BCG: tuberculosis vaccine HR: hazard ratio: how much more likely an event is in one situation than in another being compared IVIR-AC: Immunisation and Vaccines-Related Implementation Research Advisory Committee of the World Health Organisation MRR: mean reciprocal rank: see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_reciprocal_rank NSE: non-specific effect: a result of a vaccine which is not specifically related to what the vaccine is supposed to be doing OPV: Oral polio vaccine RCT: randomised controlled trials About the Author Dr. Meryl Nass is a physician and researcher who proved the world’s largest anthrax epidemic was due to biological warfare. She revealed the dangers of the anthrax vaccine. Her license was suspended for prescribing covid medications and “misinformation.” She has been disentangling covid disinformation since 2020 and regularly writes articles on her Substack page titled ‘Meryl’s COVID Newsletter’. Dr. Nass is also the founder of ‘Door to Freedom’, a website that was created to help us get back our rights and freedoms by collecting lots of relevant information about the changes in our world, in one place.

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/24/mrna-injections-make-a-third-of-workers-sick/ A recent German study on the inability to work post-vaccination found that 35% of healthcare workers took sick leave after receiving an mRNA covid injection. “Among 1704 [healthcare workers] HCWs enrolled, 595 (34.9%) HCWs were on sick leave following at least one covid-19 vaccination, leading to a total number of 1550 sick days,” the authors wrote. “Both the absolute sick days and the rate of HCWs on sick leave significantly increased with each subsequent vaccination.” The study was published in the September issue of the journal Elsevier. Data for the study was collected by way of an electronic questionnaire. It forms part of the ongoing CoVacSer cohort study. The CoVacSer cohort study is a research project that aims to investigate the relationship between mental health, sleep quality and the immunogenicity of covid injections among healthcare workers. The study is conducted by a team of scientists from the University of Wuerzburg, Germany, and involves healthcare workers who received mRNA-based covid “vaccines.” In the inability to work study, the researchers found that there was no significant difference in sick leave after the second dose between the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna injections. However, the third dose of Moderna induced a significantly longer and more frequent sick leave than the third dose of Pfizer-BioNTech. The researchers concluded: In the light of further covid-19 infection waves and booster vaccinations, there is a risk of additional staff shortages due to postvaccination inability to work, which could negatively impact the already strained healthcare system and jeopardise patient care. These findings will aid further vaccination campaigns to minimise the impact of staff absences on the healthcare system. Inability to work following COVID-19 vaccination – a relevant aspect for future booster vaccinations, Elsevier, September 2023 Commenting on the study, Dr. Peter McCullough wrote: “I wonder if hospital administrators take this into account that a third of nurses get so sick after the shot they have to call in ill and miss work. It would be higher if the nurse had not planned a day off after injection. “The word is out after three years of covid-19 vaccination, the products are toxic and there are serious consequences including missing work for the employer who held that precious job ransom over unwanted, ill-advised, experimental genetic vaccination.”

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/24/squalene-in-vaccines-cause-our-immune-systems-to/ In a recent article, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny explained the toxicity of adjuvants used in vaccines. In particular, she explained what MF59 is and warned about the potential harms of injecting this squalene-based adjuvant into people. Fluad (aQIV), a flu vaccine introduced in the UK in the 2018-19 flu season for adults aged 65 and older, contains MF59. MF59 is Novartis’ squalene-based adjuvant. “The main ingredient in MF59 is squalene oil … from fish oil,” the University of Oxford’s Vaccine Knowledge website states. And goes on to claim that “There is no evidence that MF59 causes [ ] serious adverse effects.” Another squalene-based adjuvant is AS03 used in various vaccine products by GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”). In May 2020, GSK penned deals offering AS03 adjuvant to several developers of covid injections. One of the covid “vaccines” that contains AS03 is SKYCovion, which the MHRA approved for use in the UK in May this year. Despite the University of Oxford boldly stating there is “no evidence that MF59 causes serious adverse effects,” it didn’t take us long to find evidence online of serious adverse effects. Within a few minutes, we found the article published by Berry Law below regarding anthrax vaccines: Causes of the Anthrax Vaccine’s Side Effects The FDA has confirmed that squalene – an oil-based adjuvant that hyperactivates the immune system – was used in some of the batches of the anthrax vaccine given to military members in the early 1990s. Squalene is very dangerous to use as an adjuvant because it can cause the body’s immune system to self-destruct. Anthrax Vaccine Presents Long Term Side Effects, Berry Law, 22 September 2023 Berry Law’s article goes on to list 13 long-term adverse effects of the squalene-based anthrax vaccine. In addition to the harm to human health, there is the harm to the natural world. Squalene belongs in sharks and not in our arms. In October 2020, conservationists warned that half a million sharks could be killed to feed the covid injection industry alone. How many more for all the other vaccines containing squalene? And then, for the cosmetic industry, 2.7 million sharks are captured and killed for their livers each year. The University of Oxford can’t have tried very hard to conduct any research on squalene-based adjuvants. And, Dr. Tenpenny has much more information than our few minutes of online search. The following is an abridged version of an article written by Dr. Tenpenny. You can read the full article HERE. Disgusting Chemicals in Vaccines: MF59 Dr. Sherri Tenpenny An adjuvant is a substance added to produce a high antibody response using the smallest amount of viral-containing (antigen) solution possible in the shot. By definition, adjuvants are considered to be “pharmacologically active drugs.” They are designed to be inert without inherent activity or toxicity on their own. It is difficult to explain how a substance can be defined as “pharmacologically active” and at the same time, be described as “inert and have no activity or toxicity.” The first adjuvants were used in 1925 by French researcher G. Ramon. After more than 75 years of use, the mechanism of action for most adjuvants is still “incompletely understood.” In other words, what they do to the body is unknown. For an adjuvant to work it must be attached to a molecule called a “carrier” or a “vehicle.” The combination (adjuvant + carrier) is referred to as an “adjuvant formula,” a supposedly inert compound. Adjuvants have the potential to cause serious health problems. A partial list of risks that have been associated with adjuvants include immune suppression, autoimmune disorders, and genetic events such as cancer, birth defects and abortions. Does that sound inert to you? Decades of experimentation have shown that “successful predictions about safety, potency, or efficacy in humans for a particular adjuvant cannot be reliably made from [animal] models. Unfortunately, the absolute safety of vaccines containing adjuvants, or any vaccine¸ cannot be guaranteed.” (Emphasis added.) MF59 and Squalene The only adjuvants currently licensed for use in humans in North America are aluminium compounds which have been in use since the 1920s. The limiting factor for approval of new adjuvants has been that most are far too toxic for use in humans. However, one adjuvant was approved in 1992. It is an oil-based adjuvant called MF59, primarily composed of squalene but also includes two emulsifying agents, Tween80 (polysorbate 80) and Span85. Manufactured in the liver, squalene is a precursor for cholesterol, the fat that is the essential building block for hormones and part of the surface of all cells. It is found in a variety of foods, including eggs and olive oil, over-the-counter medications, and health supplements. It can also be purchased at health food stores in its more commonly known form, shark liver oil. In the early 1970s, UCLA Medical Centre scientist Carl M. Pearson began experimenting with a variety of edible oils, hoping to discover a safer, less toxic vaccine adjuvant. His assumption was that because these oils were naturally occurring and could be metabolised by the body, they would be safe. In his well-chronicled book ‘Vaccine A: The Government Experiment That’s Killing Our Soldiers and Why GIs Are Only the First Victims’, award-winning investigative journalist Gary Matsumoto gives an excellent explanation of the difference between ingesting an edible compound and injecting one into the body: “Intuitively, this premise seems somewhat dubious: Your body could metabolise a cheeseburger, for instance, but you couldn’t liquefy it in a blender and inject the resulting slurry [into your arm], and then expect to feel well in the morning.” The same holds true for squalene in shark oil and other edible oils. Scientific data, published in peer-reviewed journals, show that injected squalene is not metabolised like a food passing through the intestinal tract. Injected squalene molecules are not broken down nor are they excreted from the body; they end up in tissues where toxic reactions can occur. Injected oils Svelander, et al. injected dozens of metabolizable oils including squalene into rats and found that all the oils were toxic, inducing arthritis with varying degrees of severity. In addition, all rats injected with squalene developed an MS-like disease that left them crippled, dragging their paralysed hindquarters across their cages. Similarly, when molecules of squalene are injected into humans, even at concentrations as small as 10 to 20 parts per billion, the oil can lead to self-destructive immune responses, such as autoimmune arthritis and lupus. More than two dozen peer-reviewed scientific papers from ten different laboratories throughout the US, Europe, Asia, and Australia have been published documenting the development of autoimmune disease in animals subjected to squalene-based adjuvants. A convincing proposal for why this occurs includes the concept of “molecular mimicry” in which an antibody created against the squalene in MF59 can cross-react with the body’s squalene on the surface of human cells. The destruction of the body’s own squalene can lead to debilitating autoimmune and central nervous system diseases. The squalene in MF59 is not the only cause for concern. One of its components, Tween80 (polysorbate 80) is considered to be inert but is far from it. A recent study (December 2005) discovered that Tween80 can cause anaphylaxis, a potentially fatal reaction characterised by a sharp drop in blood pressure, hives, and breathing difficulties. Researchers concluded that the severe reaction was not a typical allergic response but it was caused by a serious disruption that had occurred within the immune system.[viii] [ix] MF59 is capable of accelerated activation of the immune system, particularly the innate (inborn) or cell-mediated immune system. Once the immune reaction is “turned on” there is no available “switch” to turn it off. MF59 induces the expression (activation) of at least 891 genes. It is the most potent activator of all adjuvants tested so far. The long-term results of this activation are unknown and most likely will not be known. Following patients for an extended period of time looking for the development of serious reactions is not what the vaccine industry is interested in studying. Vaccine clinical trials are interested primarily in two results: 1. the assessment of reactions, usually within five to fourteen days of receiving the vaccine and, 2. the development of an “adequate antibody response.” If the numbers of reactions were “acceptably” low and the antibody level was found to be “acceptably” high the vaccine is considered to be “safe and effective.” But there are problems with this conclusion. For one, it can take longer than 14 days to develop an autoimmune reaction in the body; in fact, it can take months. No long-term studies have been designed to investigate the development of these problems because these studies are expensive and time-consuming. The second problem is the definition of “effectiveness” used by clinical investigators. Most clinicians interpret “effective” as “protective.” In other words, if a vaccine is declared effective the person who receives it will be protected from infection. However, in vaccine research, “effectiveness” is defined as the vaccine’s ability to induce an “acceptably high antibody response,” called a titre. The assumption is made that if the titres are elevated, protection is automatically conferred. This assumption has not been proven. In fact, the mainstream medical journal Vaccine published an article in 2001, clearly stating: “It is known that, in many instances, antigen-specific antibody titres do not correlate with protection.” (Emphasis added.) This means you can get the vaccine, develop antibodies, and still get the disease the vaccine was designed to protect you from. In addition, you get all the risks that come with the toxic vaccine components. In spite of the known risks, MF59 was licensed for use in Fluad in Europe in 1997 and in the US in 2016. The adjuvant was chosen over concerns that aluminium did not substantially increase the antibody level in elderly patients who received a flu shot, but when MF59 was added, the antibody response more than doubled. The vaccine was deemed “safe and effective” by the investigators, but the results of the study could be seriously flawed. The clinical trial only involved elderly people in nursing homes; the average age was 71.5 years. If autoimmune problems such as fatigue and joint pain developed in this geriatric population, doctors might not attribute these complaints to anything but old age. If autoimmune problems occur in the general population after vaccination, doctors may well attribute these complaints to “anything but” the vaccine. The risks are magnified by the fact that MF 59 was not tested to see if it induces hypersensitivity or if it increases the risk of anaphylaxis, allergies, or even cancer. The manufacturers of Fluad admitted to this lack of testing at the original approval meeting. They passed it off by saying: “We don’t test MF59 separately because it’s not a product.” If the term “MF59” rings a bell, it may be through its association with the anthrax vaccine. Matsumoto’s book is a bone-chilling account of MF59 used in the anthrax vaccine given to tens of thousands of US troops going to the Gulf. This squalene-containing, unlicensed, experimental vaccine has been implicated as the cause of Gulf War Syndrome in thousands of military men and women. The warning given by Matsumoto in his book regarding the widespread use of MF59 is sobering: “The unethical experiments detailed in [my] book are ongoing, with little prospect of being self-limiting because they have been shielded from scrutiny and public accountability by national security concerns.” He was referring to the anthrax vaccine and the military. However, because squalene-containing adjuvants are going to be a key ingredient in a whole new generation of vaccines intended for mass immunisation around the globe, the problems may just be just over the horizon. The grave reality is that despite denials from the government, the vaccine industry, and the military the highly-recommended book, Vaccine A, was a premonition of the serious health problems to come when MF59 or similar adjuvants are used in vaccines for the general population. About the Author Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is an osteopathic medical doctor and founder of Tenpenny Integrative Medical Centre in Cleveland, Ohio. She has invested 21+ years and far more than 40,000 hours researching, documenting, and exposing problems associated with vaccines. She is a frequent speaker at national and international conferences and a regular guest on radio shows, podcasts and on TV, sharing her highly researched information on why we should just say no to vaccines. She publishes articles and podcasts on her website which you can subscribe to HERE. She also publishes articles on her Substack page titled ‘Dr. Tenpenny’s Eye on the Evidence’ which you can subscribe to and follow HERE.

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/25/how-the-covid-conspirators-will-cover-up-their-crimes-a-chilling-prediction-by-ed-dowd/ “These crimes are so horrific [that] I think … once this comes to light, there’ll be no place to hide on the planet, in my humble opinion.” “We’re getting there [the tipping point] quickly as word of mouth spreads on the dangers of these vaccines,” data analyst Edward Dowd told Dr. Naomi Wolf in a recent interview. Dowd refers to the “tipping point” as the moment the public becomes so aware of COVID “vaccine” harms that demands for accountability become unshakeable. Originally published at Vigilant News “And when we get to a critical amount of people, the anger will be such that the politicians will understand that something’s changed, the regulators will start to worry, and we’ll start to see something — or an event that will cover it all up.” Dowd cited why he thinks “we’re getting close” to the tipping point. “Megyn Kelly came out recently, and she’s now talking about her injury. I think we’re going to see more and more of this, and this is going to become more and more of a dinner table conversation.” Dowd continued. “The folks of Maui used to treat me differently when I was doing what I was doing, meaning they thought I was full of crap … Now, they want to hang out with me … because that’s the word of mouth spreading. Booster uptake for me is [also] word of mouth. People are clearly not running towards the boosters anymore.” According to PBS, 75% of Americans skipped last year’s COVID-19 booster shot. Chances are the booster uptake will be even less this year. “Well, what’s going to happen politically?” asked Dr. Wolf. “What do people at the highest levels behind the scenes start to do when the rank and file start to realize they [and their loved ones] have been murdered?” “Well, so this is the problem,” answered Dowd. “In more normal times, we’d peacefully vote all these people out, then investigate them and prosecute them. But these crimes are so horrific [that] I think the establishment is going to try to create a diversion or steal the election to prevent themselves from ever being prosecuted. Because once this comes to light, there’ll be no place to hide on the planet, in my humble opinion.” Tucker Carlson echoed a similar sentiment on August 30. Carlson warned about the slippery slope of criminalizing political activity. He suggested that once politicians begin indicting their opponents (Trump), they set a precedent to which they themselves could be subjected. As a result, Carlson claimed that Democrats “can’t lose” or that they will get indicted themselves. Therefore, “they will do anything to win.” The likely distraction — a hot war with Russia. “There will be a hot war between the United States and Russia in the next year. They want it anyway. I don’t think we’ll win it, but that’s a separate analysis. But I think, as a political matter, they need to declare war footing in order to assume war powers in order to win [the election]. I believe that, and I think all the evidence suggests that’s true. So, if you’re worried about our politics getting even more vicious than it already is and people being hurt in our politics, which is entirely possible, you should be worried about the prospect of an open war.” So, it seems Ed Dowd and Tucker Carlson agree. To avoid accountability at all costs, the people in power need to retain power. And this desperate grip on power, according to both analysts, will likely push them to take drastic measures. Edward Dowd’s full interview with Dr. Naomi Wolf is available to watch via the video below: Ed Dowd Reveals Astonishing Death Rates in the UK