top of page

Search Results

2398 items found for ""

  • U.S. Bankrolling Creation of Deadlier, More Contagious Bird Flu Strains

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/united-states-bankrolling-creation-deadlier-contagious-bird-flu-strains/? Under the guise of creating bird flu vaccines, U.S. government agencies and private funders like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are bankrolling gain-of-function research to make bird flu viruses more lethal and transmissible among mammals. U.S. health officials only recently admitted to funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China — but for decades, the U.S. government has funded the same type of dangerous research on bird flu in the U.S. And that research continues today. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) — even the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation — have funded or are funding research to make bird flu more pathogenic and/or more transmissible in mammals. Appearing on the “Kim Iversen Show” on May 16, Brian Hooker, Ph.D., Children’s Health Defense chief scientific officer, said he is concerned the U.S. is “making agents of … biological destruction” that could “put us into another pandemic.” Hooker echoed warnings by former CDC Director Robert Redfield, who suggested the next pandemic would be sparked by a leak from a lab working to humanize bird flu viruses. Hooker told Iversen the CDC’s Influenza Division infected ferrets with the currently circulating H5N1 avian influenza strain, then infected human lung cells, to make the virus more infective to humans. Their justification, he said, is to be prepared for a zoonotic outbreak — where a virus from a bird or other animal jumps to humans. “The party line that you hear all the time is, ‘Well, we have to develop these pathogens because then we can develop the countermeasures,’ — the vaccines, the monoclonal antibodies, the therapeutics,” he said. Long list of gain-of-function studies on bird flu The CDC, BARDA, NIAID and the World Health Organization (WHO) have conducted or funded dangerous bird flu studies. Jessica Belser, a lead researcher with the CDC, was involved in numerous studies exploring the pathogenicity and transmissibility of bird flu viruses. She is co-author of a March 2024 study on the H5N1 strain causing fatal disease and transmitting between co-housed ferrets. In 2020, Belser studied how different strains of the H9N2 flu virus, which have genetic and antigenic differences, show varying patterns of replication and transmission in mammalian animal models. The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention was a collaborator. In 2016, Belser studied how different bird flu strains, including H5N1, H7N9 and H9N2, could infect human pulmonary endothelial cells. Richard Webby, Ph.D., a BARDA-associated researcher and director of the WHO Collaborating Centre for Studies on the Ecology of Influenza in Animals and Birds, is co-author of a May 2024 paper studying the susceptibility and transmissibility in the pig population of highly pathogenic avian influenza derived from mink. In a 2017 study funded by the NIAID, Webby tested bird flu vaccines on ferrets, infecting them with the wild virus to determine the vaccines’ efficacy. Hooker told The Defender this research is dangerous because ferrets “are immunologically very close to humans. … It’s not a huge leap for them to suddenly get into the human population and start human-to-human transmission.” Christine Oshansky, chief of Pandemic Vaccines and Adjuvants at BARDA, co-authored a 2021 study of highly pathogenic influenza H7N9 and a vaccine formulation. In 2018, Oshansky tested H5N1 vaccines stored in the national Influenza vaccine stockpile for up to 12 years to determine if they could be effective against divergent A (H5) influenza viruses. The WHO funded the May 2020 study, “Pandemic potential of highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4 A(H5) viruses.” Collaborators included the CDC, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and other organizations. Webby and Yoshihiro Kawaoka, DVM, Ph.D. of the University of Wisconson are among the listed authors. “That’s the huge danger of doing this work,” Hooker said. “Whether it’s an accidental or intentional release, you’re playing with these pathogens so that they’re basically creating variants that are infectious in humans.” The vaccine cash cow Hooker told Iversen there are “myriad patents associated with bird flu vaccines [and] bird flu pathogens.” Kawaoka, the researcher long funded by NIAID to conduct bird flu research, has 78 patents in his portfolio, many of them related to bird flu vaccination. In 2023, Kawaoka filed patents on: Mutations that confer genetic stability to additional genes in influenza viruses (US-11802273-B2). Recombinant influenza viruses with stabilized HA for replication in eggs (US-11807872 – B2). A humanized cell line (US-11851648-B2). In 2022, Kawaoka filed a patent for influenza virus replication for vaccine development (US-113906-B2). Richard Bright, former BARDA director and a bird flu researcher at the CDC from 1998-2006, has an “extensive patent portfolio on — you guessed it — bird flu vaccines,” Hooker said. “And so these prophets of doom hit the airwaves and they scare everybody.” Hooker also noted that Moderna is developing an mRNA-based bird flu vaccine. U.S. relaxed H5N1 bird flu regulations this month The U.S. government on May 6 released a new policy to tighten oversight of federally funded research on potentially dangerous pathogens, which won’t take effect until May 2025. The policy categorizes high-risk research into two groups, requiring risk-benefit assessments and mitigation plans for both, with an additional layer of review for research involving pathogens with enhanced pandemic potential. The move aims to address concerns about lax oversight and ambiguous guidelines while ensuring that critical research on pandemic preparedness and medical advancements can continue, according to Nature. In a seemingly contradictory move, U.S. government officials on May 14 temporarily relaxed regulations on how public health laboratories and healthcare facilities handle, store and transport H5N1 bird flu samples, according to Reuters. This 180-day change comes in response to the recent spread of the virus to dairy cattle in nine U.S. states. The revised guidance, requested by the Association of Public Health Laboratories, aims to reduce bureaucratic burdens and allow lab staff to focus on testing, preparing for the possibility that the virus could acquire the ability to become easily transmitted among humans.

  • Evidence continues to accumulate showing vitamin D helps combat cancer

    https://expose-news.com/2024/05/20/more-evidence-vitamin-d-helps-combat-cancer/ More Evidence Showing Vitamin D Combats Cancer By Dr. Joseph Mercola I strongly recommend getting sensible sun exposure each day, and one of the reasons why is because it helps naturally optimise your vitamin D levels. Low vitamin D levels are linked to an increased risk of cancers,1 while vitamin D can attach to the vitamin D receptor (“VDR”) in your cells, setting off a series of signals that may affect how they grow, develop and survive.2 In this way, vitamin D acts like a brake on the process of cell growth in many tissues of the body, helping to control the speed at which cells multiply. This is particularly important when it comes to cancer because one of the key features of this disease is cells growing out of control. Moreover, vitamin D has been observed in animal studies to help delay some age-related changes by activating another important pathway via the vitamin D receptor. This pathway involves a molecule called Nrf2, which plays a crucial role in protecting your body from oxidative stress and DNA damage – two factors that are commonly linked to the development of cancer.3 Overall, evidence continues to accumulate showing that vitamin D is a strong ally to combat cancer.4 Vitamin D Reduces Cancer Mortality Worldwide, cancer is the number 2 cause of death, behind only cardiovascular disease.5 Meanwhile, the global prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (defined as a level of less than 20 ng/ml) and insufficiency (defined as a level of 20 to less than 30 ng/ml) is 40% to 100%.6 Although increasing vitamin D levels may help to reduce cancer deaths, health officials rarely recommend optimising levels for this purpose. For example, research has shown that once you reach a minimum serum vitamin D level of 40 ng/ml, your risk for cancer diminishes by 67%, compared to having a level of 20 ng/ml or less.7 A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis published in Ageing Research Reviews also found vitamin D3 supplementation reduced cancer mortality by 6%. This wasn’t considered statistically significant, but when only studies involving daily vitamin D intake were analysed, cancer mortality dropped by a significant 12%.8 According to the researchers:9 From a biological perspective, it is plausible that a sufficient vitamin D status has an impact on cancer prognosis: by binding to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), the active hormone 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) influences signalling pathways that regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and cell survival, and thus acts as an anti-proliferative agent in many tissues and can slow the growth of malignant cells. Other research also supports vitamin D’s role in protecting against cancer death. In one study of 25,871 patients, vitamin D supplementation was found to reduce the risk of metastatic cancer and death by 17%. The risk was reduced by as much as 38% among those who also maintained a healthy weight.10,11 What’s particularly noteworthy is this study only gave participants 2,000 IU of vitamin D daily and didn’t measure their blood levels. Despite these research flaws, a significant benefit was still found. However, other research has found even more striking benefits, including a GrassrootsHealth analysis published in PLOS ONE. It showed women with a vitamin D level at or above 60 ng/ml (150 nmol/l) had an 82% lower risk of breast cancer compared to those with levels below 20 ng/ml (50 nmol/l).12 Meanwhile, risks of lung cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer and lymphoma are higher in people with low vitamin D levels, while having higher levels is associated with a better prognosis in cases of breast and colorectal cancers.13 The Ageing Research Reviews study further revealed that daily vitamin D supplementation was particularly beneficial for people aged 70 and over, as well as those who took vitamin D daily and were later diagnosed with cancer. Study author Ben Schöttker, PhD, with the German Cancer Research Centre in Heidelberg, further explained:14 This does imply that basically everyone aged 50 and older, including people who have never had cancer, might profit from vitamin D supplementation if they are vitamin D insufficient … Doctors cannot know who might develop cancer at a later time. Vitamin D Has Anticancer Effects Against Many Types of Cancer A mini review on the impact of vitamin D on cancer, published in The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, pointed out that while vitamin D is widely recognised for its essential role in regulating the balance of minerals in the body, a deficiency has been linked to the onset and progression of various cancers.15 Vitamin D targets cancer in multiple ways, including:16 Anticancer effects, which means it targets different stages of cancer development and progression, including the initiation, growth and spread of cancer cells. Antimetastatic effects, which refer to the ability to stop cancer cells from spreading from the original tumour site to other parts of the body. Since metastasis is often responsible for the fatal outcomes of cancers, preventing the spread can significantly improve survival rates. Anti-tumorigenic, meaning vitamin D helps prevent tumour formation or the growth of tumours. This can involve mechanisms like inducing cell death in cancer cells, blocking cell cycle progression, or inhibiting pathways that fuel tumour growth. The review highlighted vitamin D’s role against the following cancers:17 In terms of breast cancer, the leading cause of death for women globally, vitamin D deficiency is common among patients, and those who are deficient are more likely to have more aggressive and harder-to-treat subtypes of breast cancer, such as higher-grade and oestrogen receptor-negative tumours. The study also highlighted the role of genetic differences in the VDR that could influence breast cancer risk. In particular, in certain populations like North Indian women from New Delhi, variations in the VDR gene were identified as potential risk factors.18 In prostate cancer – the most common cancer in men – low levels of vitamin D were linked to high levels of dihydrotestosterone (“DHT”) in the prostate which is associated with the progression of prostate cancer.19 In addition, vitamin D may influence the activity of sirtuin 1 (“SIRT1”), which is known as a longevity protein. Optimising your vitamin D levels may help boost your body’s natural cancer defences, in part, via mechanisms involving SIRT1.20 Additional research suggests there may be considerable variation in how different individuals’ genes respond to vitamin D supplementation, which might explain why not everyone benefits equally from extra vitamin D. For best results, the scientists suggest vitamin D supplementation should be personalised and “advocate for options tailored to individual vitamin D needs, combined with a comprehensive intervention that favours prevention through a healthy environment and responsible health behaviours.”21 Why Sun Exposure Is the Best Source of Vitamin D On a typical sunny day, your body may produce up to 25,000 international units (“IU”) of vitamin D,22 although many people aren’t in the sun enough to optimise their vitamin D levels. However, I strongly recommend getting your vitamin D from proper sun exposure, if possible, as it provides benefits beyond vitamin D optimisation. Higher levels of vitamin D may even serve as a marker for healthy sun exposure, which in turn may be responsible for many of the health benefits, which include reduced risk of cancer and increased longevity, attributed to vitamin D. Regular sun exposure, for instance, enhances production of melatonin – a potent anticancer agent.23 Near-infrared rays from the sun penetrate deep into your body and activate cytochrome c oxidase, which in turn stimulates the production of melatonin inside your mitochondria. Your mitochondria produce ATP, the energy currency of your body. A byproduct of this ATP production is reactive oxidative species (“ROS”), which are responsible for oxidative stress. Excessive amounts of ROS will damage the mitochondria, contributing to suboptimal health, inflammation and chronic health conditions such as diabetes, obesity and thrombosis (blood clots). But melatonin essentially mops up ROS that damage your mitochondria. So, by getting plenty of sun exposure during the day, your mitochondria will be bathed in melatonin, thereby reducing oxidative stress.24,25 If you’re unable to get adequate sun exposure each day, vitamin D supplementation may be necessary. Keep in mind that 20 ng/ml, which is often used as the cutoff for vitamin D deficiency, has repeatedly been shown to be grossly insufficient for good health and disease prevention, which means the true prevalence of people without optimal levels of vitamin D is even greater. The only way to determine how much sun exposure is enough and/or how much vitamin D3 you need to take is to measure your vitamin D level, ideally twice a year. Once you’ve confirmed your vitamin D levels via testing, adjust your sun exposure and/or vitamin D3 supplementation accordingly. Then, remember to retest in three to four months to make sure you’ve reached your target level. The Optimal Vitamin D Level for Cancer Prevention The optimal level for health and disease prevention, including cancer prevention, is between 60 ng/ml and 80 ng/ml (150-200 nmol/l), while the cutoff for sufficiency appears to be around 40 ng/ml. In Europe, the measurements you’re looking for are 150 to 200 nmol/l and 100 nmol/l respectively. It’s important to remember that calcium, vitamin D3, magnesium and vitamin K2 must be properly balanced for optimal overall health. Your best and safest bet is to simply eat more calcium, magnesium and vitamin K2-rich foods, along with sensible sun exposure. However, if you find supplementation is necessary after a serum vitamin D test, also supplement with magnesium and vitamin K2 (“MK-7”) to ensure proper balance. You’ll also want to ensure you’re following an overall healthy lifestyle to reduce your cancer risk as much as possible. As researchers explained in Nutrients:26 Vitamin D supplementation is not the magic pill that miraculously solves the cancer burden or that can replace a healthy lifestyle. It is necessary to foster a good environment and invigorate a healthy lifestyle, including a high-quality diet and physical activity. Both have been proven to confer health benefits in many diseases, including cancer and are the best preventive measures available. Sources and References 1, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology July 2023, Volume 231, 106308 2, 3 Ageing Research Reviews June 2023, Volume 87, 101923, Introduction 4 Substack, Dr. William Makis, April 18, 2024 5 J Thorac Dis. 2017 Mar; 9(3): 448–451 6 Endocr Pract. 2021 May; 27(5): 484–493., Introduction 7 PLOS ONE 2016; 11 (4): e0152441 8, 9, 13 Ageing Research Reviews June 2023, Volume 87, 101923 10 JAMA Network Open 2020;3(11):e2025850 11 The Sentinel November 22, 2020 12 PLOS ONE June 15, 2015 (PDF) 14 Medical News Today May 17, 2023 20 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(7), 6154; doi: 10.3390/ijms24076154 21, 26 Nutrients 2022, 14(21), 4512; doi: 10.3390/nu14214512 22 J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2019 May;189:228-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 Jan 4., Abstract 23 YouTube, The Joe Cohen Show, Episode 1, October 25, 2022, 4:00 24 Physiology February 5, 2020 DOI: 10.1152/physiol.00034.2019 25 YouTube, MedCram, Sunlight: Optimize Health and Immunity January 21, 2022 About the Author Dr. Joseph Mercola is the founder and owner of Mercola.com, a Board-Certified Family Medicine Osteopathic Physician, a Fellow of the American College of Nutrition and a New York Times bestselling author.  He publishes multiple articles a day covering a wide range of topics on his website Mercola.com.

  • Pfizer whistle-blower says about a third of Pfizer’s covid injections contained graphene oxide, but the debate continues

    https://expose-news.com/2024/05/20/a-third-ofvaccines-contained-graphene-oxide/ Last week, Pfizer whistle-blower Melissa McAtee said that Pfizer’s internal database had evidence from a laboratory in Spain that up to a third of covid injection vials contained graphene oxide. Melissa McAtee worked for Pfizer while their covid mRNA products were in development. When she became aware of the problems taking place in her facility, McAtee became a whistle-blower. From communications among staff about contaminants in the injections to blacked-out windows when the US Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) inspectors made their rounds, she refused to stay silent when the injectables were set to be rolled out to the public. On CHD.TV’s  ‘Doctors & Scientists’ last week, Melissa McAtee laid out all she collected, observed, and discovered in the process of digging up the truth about the Big Pharma giant. During the interview, she discussed the presence of graphene oxide in covid injections. “The first thing I found was in … June or July of 2021, and it was a graphene oxide report from Spain that this lab had found graphene oxide in one vial of Pfizer vaccine that didn’t have a full dosage in it,” McAtee told Brian Hooker. The whistle-blower added, “And so, they compared it under a microscope to 100 per cent graphene oxide and they determined that it looks almost identical, but requested more samples so that they could do a more structural chemical analysis than just visual.” McAtee said that “later, much later, I followed up on them to see what happened, and if I remember correctly, 28 vials out of a hundred did have graphene oxide, of the Pfizer vials.” The Pfizer whistle-blower goes on to note that the Spanish laboratory “requested more and when … I found this on the internal Pfizer database, I didn’t know it was the internal Pfizer database, I actually thought it was just internet public knowledge. But I shared that report on my Facebook and I got a call not long after that, I don’t know how long, but not long after that from a Pfizer lawyer telling me that I had to take down the post because that was company property. And that’s when I realised, ‘Hey, I guess I can see [Pfizer’s] internal database …” McAtee searched the database for the code “HEK 293T” and the first returned in the search results were emails in which Pfizer executives and communications department were conspiring to hide that aborted foetal cell lines were used in the development and confirmatory tests for the vaccine.  This was because of the Vatican’s stance on encouraging the public to get the vaccine. McAtee only talks about vaccine hesitancy based on religious and moral grounds.  However, aside from the religious apsect and exemptions based on religious beliefs, there is the risk of cancer from the HEK 293T cell line. HEK 293T is code for “human embryonic kidney 293T cells.” The “T” in HEK 293T refers to the presence of the Simian Vacuolating Virus 40 (“SV40”) large T-antigen. The SV40 T-antigen is a protein and is a dominant-acting oncoprotein, a gene that has the potential to cause cancer. According to McAtee, the covid vaccine manufacturers did not include HEK cells, they were only used in the development of the vaccines. McAtee has documented her testimony in the form of a slide share which you can read HERE. Children’s Health Defense: Former Pfizer Employee Reveals Contaminations in Covid Vaccines, 17 May 2024 (38 mins) In March 2023, the Twitter profile ‘Not Op Cue’ posted a thread highlighting information from an article by Humourous Mathematics.  You can read the thread HERE. After the FDA did not respond to a Freedom of Information Act request, Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (“PHMPT”) sued the FDA for not releasing information supplied to them by Pfizer.  Humourous Mathematics showed an image from one of the Pfizer documents that was subsequently released. Within their 7 April to 19 August 2020 study titled ‘Structural and Biophysical Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein (P2 S) as a Vaccine Antigen’ (file name: 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf [released 1 February 2023]) they confirm their use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer mRNA covid-19 injection. Pfizer states on page 7 section 3.4 ‘Cryogenic Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM)’ of their study that graphene oxide is required to manufacture the Pfizer mRNA covid-19 injection because it is needed as a base to stabilise the lipid nanoparticles. The Adverse Effects of Experimental Messenger RNA (mRNA) “Vaccines” a.k.a. Injections For Covid-19, Humourous Mathematics, 18 March 2021 (updated 16 February 2024) However, Jikkyleaks, who has worked hard for years to expose the nefarious covid agenda, quickly responded: AP fact-checkers also used the point Jikkyleaks noted about Pfizer’s document to debunk the claim that Pfizer’s covid injections contained graphene oxide. On 7 April 2023, the Associated Press said that the document being cited online does not say anything about vaccine manufacturing but instead describes using graphene oxide during a process of evaluating the vaccine’s spike protein under a microscope. So, Pfizer’s document is not sufficient to prove the presence of graphene oxide in Pfizer’s covid “vaccines” that were administered to the public. However, as Sense Receptor noted in a tweet when sharing McAtee’s interview above, graphene oxide is commonly studied as a material for gene-delivery nanoparticles and added a link to a 2019 paper published in Applied Physics Letters. As we read the excerpt from the abstract of the paper below, we should recall that, as Dr. Ah Kahn Syed explained, the lipid nanoparticle used in mRNA injections is a cationic lipid particle. Graphene oxide (GO) is employed in a broad range of biomedical applications including antimicrobial therapies, scaffolds for tissue engineering, and drug delivery, among others. However, the inability to load it efficiently with double-stranded DNA impairs its use as a gene delivery system. To overcome this limitation, in this work, the functionalisation of GO with cationic lipids (CL) is proficiently accomplished by microfluidic manufacturing. Riccardo Di Santo, Erica Quagliarini, Sara Palchetti, Daniela Pozzi, Valentina Palmieri, Giordano Perini, Massimiliano Papi, Anna Laura Capriotti, Aldo Laganà, Giulio Caracciolo; Microfluidic-generated lipid-graphene oxide nanoparticles for gene delivery. Appl. Phys. Lett. 10 June 2019; 114 (23): 233701. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5100932 Out of 100 vials tested by a laboratory in Spain, 28 vials were found to contain graphene oxide.  A study of a larger sample needs to be done to establish how widespread the use of graphene oxide is in terms of the number of vaccine batches, and when and where they were manufactured.  So, the debate of whether Pfizer’s mRNA injections that were administered to the public contain graphene oxide continues.  Or as the late Dr. Andreas Noack pointed out, the University of Almeria’s Professor Pablo Campra (as publicised by the Spanish podcast La Quinta Columna) did not find graphene oxide but rather graphene hydroxide.

  • Ugly chaos incoming soon to a place near you!

    Choose YOUR future flavor... Uh, like now is your choice point...

  • SPRINGBANK HONEY - Please share this, we need your help, to stop being forced to destroy their lively hood.

    Please share every where https://www.instagram.com/p/C646ff0xTy8/?igsh=MW5uNjF6NzcxeXFucw==

  • CDC Admits Covid Shots Killed 500,000 Children & Young Adults

    https://slaynews.com/news/cdc-admits-covid-shots-killed-500000-children-young-adults/ A secret report has emerged from the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that exposes the shocking impact of Covid mRNA injections on American children and young adults. The bombshell report shows that a staggering half a million American children and young adults have been killed by Covid shots. The CDC report has revealed that almost 500,000 Americans aged between 0 and 44 years old died from the dangerous side effects of the Covid mRNA injections. The recorded deaths occurred between the start of the public rollout of the shots in early 2021 and October 9, 2022. However, due to the timeline of the data, the already shocking figures do not include deaths recorded over the past year and a half. Shockingly, the explosive revelations from the report have been completely ignored by the corporate media – the same outlets that told the public the vaccines were “safe and effective.” Compared to other countries, the U.S. Government has been slow to publish relevant and up-to-date data to allow the public to analyze the consequences of rolling out the Covid injections. However, the data has finally been made public by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OEC). The OEC is an intergovernmental organization with 38 member countries founded in 1961 to stimulate economic progress and world trade. The organization hosts a wealth of U.S. government data on excess deaths. The data is available for review here. Figures provided to the OEC by the CDC show excess deaths among children and young adults aged 0-44 across the USA by week in 2020 and 2021. The official figures reveal that there was a slight increase in excess deaths among children and young adults when the Covid pandemic hit the US in early 2020. With the introduction of Covid mRNA shots, and the promise from health officials about the “safe and effective” vaccines’ claimed impact, one would have expected deaths to have fallen significantly among the age group in 2021. Instead, however, the opposite happened. Excess deaths among children and young adults skyrocketed every single week in 2021. Throughout 2021, excess deaths were far higher than they were in 2020 except for weeks 29 and 30. Unfortunately, official figures provided by the CDC show that the trend continued through 2022. The most recent data released by the CDC covers up to week 40 of 2022, the week ending October 9. The CDC has confirmed that there have been 7,680 more excess deaths among children and young adults in 2022 so far than there were during the same time frame in 2020 at the height of the Covid pandemic, according to a report from the Exposé. The year 2021, was by and far the worst, however, with 27,227 more excess deaths by week 40 following the roll-out of the Covid-19 injection than what occurred in 2020 at the height of the alleged Covid-19 pandemic. The official CDC figures show all deaths and excess deaths among children and young adults across the United States prior to the rollout of the Covid vaccines and after. The figures reveal that the first 9 months of 2022 saw only 1,352 fewer excess deaths among 0-44-year-olds than the whole of 2020 – the supposed peak of the pandemic. But the most concerning figures revealed are the overall number of deaths and excess deaths among children and young adults since the rollout of the Covid injections. Nearly half a million Americans aged 0 to 44 have died after receiving the Covid shots, which were supposed to “protect” them from the virus. This report from the CDC comes after recent reporting from Slay News regarding the shocking leaked documents from the UK government’s efforts to promote the vaccines through fear tactics. The explosive leaked docs show medical staff were ordered to euthanize patients who had been admitted to hospital and tested positive for COVID-19. The official documents were leaked from the UK’s state-funded National Health Service (NHS). The docs further confirm the previous reporting from Slay News that revealed patients were euthanized in order to boost the numbers for “Covid deaths.” As Slay News reported, smoking gun evidence revealed that tens of thousands of elderly people were murdered to boost the mortality rates. The data produced for the report indicated that people were being euthanized using a fatal injection of Midazolam. The cause of their deaths was then listed as “Covid,” indicating that the virus was killing far more elderly people than it was. The explosive data from the report was made public by Australian politician Craig Kelly, the national director of the United Australia Party. The report obtained official UK government data on death rates and causes. According to Kelly, the patients were euthanized in order to boost “Covid deaths” and ramp up public fear to garner support for lockdowns and vaccines. While alerting the public about the data, Kelly declared that it exposes “the crime of the century.” “These deaths were then falsely blamed on Covid, which was the basis of the public fear campaigns used to justify the lockdowns and mass-mandated injections of the public (including children) with an experimental medical intervention that had zero long-term safety data,” Kelly said in a post on X alongside copies of the data. “Along the way, a small group pushing the need for mass-mandated injections made billions. “This paper shows that the UK spike in deaths, wrongly attributed to COVID-19 in April 2020, was not due to SARS-CoV-2 virus, which was largely absent, but was due to the widespread use of Midazolam injections which were statistically very highly correlated (coefficient over 90 percent) with excess deaths in all regions of England during 2020. “The widespread and persistent use of Midazolam in UK suggests a possible policy of systemic euthanasia.” READ MORE – Renowned Scientist: All Covid-Vaxxed ‘Will Die in 3 to 5 Years’

bottom of page