Search Results

https://vigilantnews.com/post/wefs-metaverse-an-enforcement-regime-for-vaccination/ This article originally appeared on The Defender and was republished with permission. Guest post by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D. As the United Nations, World Economic Forum (WEF), European Union, World Bank and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation push for a global digital ID, a new WEF report highlights the “pivotal role” a person’s “digital identity” is expected to play in the metaverse. The WEF’s “Metaverse Identity: Defining the Self in a Blended Reality” report, published last month and written in collaboration with Accenture, a multinational internet technology company, states: “The metaverse, poised to redefine the internet, intertwines the digital and physical, emphasizing the pivotal role of ‘identity’ in shaping immersive, human-centric experiences.” According to the foreword to the full WEF report, “The metaverse will act as a conduit to blend the digital world with the physical world and transform how people interact with information, others and their surroundings” and digital ID will be “a cornerstone in metaverse identity.” The WEF’s March report comes on the heels of last month’s report by the RAND Corporation and the U.K. Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, which states that “future metaverses may reach such a sophistication level that they ‘come to function almost like new countries.’” The RAND report predicts the Internet of Bodies ecosystem, where humans and machines are essentially merged, may result in the development of the “Internet of Brains” sometime between 2035-2050. An opportunity ‘to control massive amounts of people’ Experts who spoke with The Defender warned that behind the WEF’s stated concern for the security of individuals’ digital identity in the metaverse, are major financial interests — and new privacy-intrusive digital tools. Seamus Bruner, author of “Controligarchs: Exposing the Billionaire Class, their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life,” and director of research at the Government Accountability Institute, told The Defender that, to understand the interests at play behind the WEF’s metaverse report, it’s vital to follow the money. “The first and most obvious answer is: money,” Bruner said. “Financial institutions like JPMorgan and Bank of America all believe the metaverse has multi-trillion-dollar potential. Goldman Sachs predicted the metaverse could be an $8 trillion opportunity.” According to a December 2023 Bankless Times report, nearly 30% of online users will use the metaverse “for work, shopping, education, or entertainment by 2026,” while “The global virtual reality market is expanding at a yearly compound rate of 31.8%.” “When people think of the metaverse, they often think of virtual reality, but that’s only one part of it,” Bruner said. “Augmented Reality will be a major component of future metaverses, but the difference between AR and VR is that the AR headsets actually see the physical world around you,” which poses privacy concerns for users. “They have cameras that see what you see and microphones that hear what you hear and say. Where will that data go?” Bruner said. Tim Hinchliffe, the publisher of The Sociable, told The Defender “Who needs facial recognition, geolocation tracking or contact tracing when any government or corporation can literally see what you are doing and where you are going in real time?” Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D., author of “Google Archipelago: The Digital Gulag and the Simulation of Freedom,” told The Defender: “The conception is materialist and mechanistic at base, the hallmarks of social engineering. It represents the world as consisting of nothing but manipulable matter, or rather, of digital media mimicking matter.“It suggests that human beings can be reduced to a material substratum and can be induced to accept a technological reproduction in lieu of reality. Further, it assumes that those who inhabit this simulacrum can be controlled by technocratic means.” Rectenwald said this “materialist, mechanistic, techno-determinist and reductionist worldview is consistent with the transhumanist belief that humans themselves will soon be succeeded by a new transhuman species, or humanity-plus (h+) — perhaps a genetically- and AI-enhanced cyborg that will outstrip ordinary humans and make the latter virtually obsolete.” Bruner said the “deeper and more insidious reason” the WEF and its partners are obsessed with virtual realities like the metaverse is the opportunity it presents “to control massive amounts of people — either as a placating tool akin to ‘bread and circuses’ or even as a brainwashing and propaganda tool.” An ‘enforcement regime’ for vaccination? The metaverse is part and parcel of the “Great Reset,” Hinchliffe and others said. “When WEF founder Klaus Schwab officially launched the Great Reset in 2020, he said that the Fourth Industrial Revolution will lead to the fusion of our physical, digital and biological identities,” Hinchliffe said. “When you combine the Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, what you get is transhumanism and the metaverse — the blending of humans and technology in virtual and augmented spaces that dissolve individual and national identities,” he said. According to Rectenwald, “The metaverse may become a means of compensating for and distracting from the real-world impoverishment created by the enactment of the Great Reset, while serving as an enforcement regime for such matters as vaccination.” At the WEF’s annual meeting in January, digital ID was proposed as a means of tracking the unvaccinated. “Thanks to the reduced satisfactions of the ‘real world’ because of the Great Reset, the metaverse may become preferable to non-virtual reality,” Rectenwald said. “And given its governance by the same elites that govern the physical world, the limitations and threats imposed by authorities in the physical world will be doubled in the metaverse.” “If you are an unelected globalist at the WEF, or if you are a big corporation, then the idea of ruling over countries that exist only in cyberspace becomes very alluring,” Hinchliffe said. “You can invent all the rules and govern without ever having to hold an election,” he added, referring to the RAND Corporation report. Catherine Austin Fitts, founder and publisher of the Solari Report and former U.S. assistant secretary of Housing and Urban Development, told The Defender, “One of the WEF’s goals is to market the central bankers’ reset … to the general public.” “Metaverse promotion is part of using online entertainment — such as video games and multi-media combined with mind control — entertainment and subliminal programming — to distract and manipulate the portion of the population that can be captured to escape the real world, part and parcel of lowering cognition and IQs,” Fitts added. For Bruner, the endgame for proponents of the metaverse is to “build back better” by “digitalizing everything using Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies such as digital IDs, digital currencies, artificial intelligence and virtual realities like the metaverse.” “Schwab has said that each of these concepts will lead to ‘a fusion of our physical, our digital, and our biological identities,’” Bruner said. Opting out could ‘negatively influence social mobility in physical worlds’ According to the WEF report, “Given that the metaverse is an extension of and an evolution of today’s internet, it may be assumed that anyone online today can have a metaverse identity. … Digital entities will be an enabling aspect of metaverse identity, facilitating and augmenting digital interactions.” The report states that metaverse identity includes “representations” of “personal, social and role identity” through “avatars, pseudonyms or other digital expressions,” data that “capture the intricate web of knowledge about individuals generated by metaverse-supporting hardware and software” and traditional forms of identification. Together, these constitute “digital crumbs that accumulate to form a metaverse identity,” the report adds. Going beyond digital ID, the “metaverse identity includes data points,” the report states, that also extend “into the intricacies of an individual’s behaviours, actions and choices.” The report gives an example of such “intricacies:” “The way an individual speaks — for example, with unique tonal inflexions or cultural idioms — can offer insights into their background and upbringing. Similarly, a person’s distinctive movements, whether it’s the fluidity of their dance or the precision of their basketball shots, tell tales of their experiences and passions. Collectively, these attributes can generate insights and inferred data.” The metaverse “enables dynamic verification through real-time, inferred data.” For example, an individual’s behaviors, paired with facial scanning, can be used as ongoing age estimation or “‘behavioural credentials,’ effectively making verification an ongoing authentication process based on individual user conduct.” “Metaverse identity,” in turn, “connects and anchors a person to the physical and virtual world,” the report states, adding that this is “central to the future of the blended world.” Potential applications of these metaverse identities range from “fashion try-ons” to “health monitoring … by inputting an individual’s daily nutrition and exercise habits into the doppelganger’s simulated environment.” The report acknowledges that there will be people “who, by choice or circumstance, remain outside the formal bounds of identification” — i.e., consciously opting out of participating in the metaverse — and that this could “negatively influence social mobility in physical worlds, given the reliance economies have on digital platforms.” When implemented together, digital currency and digital ID “will create a global, interoperable system that allows WEF-allied central banks to track, trace, surveil, and ultimately control how people spend their money, and thus, live their lives,” Bruner said. According to Rectenwald, the WEF and its corporate partners are interested in “developing and promoting the metaverse particularly to create metaverse identities,” allowing all internet use to be collected in a database “connected to individual users.” He added: “In this way, all internet activity of users will become part of their digital identities, which will then be used to connect their online activities with all other activity, including but not limited to their banking, attitudes, beliefs, politics and even their compliance with various ‘health’ measures being rolled out.” Hinchliffe predicted that “some form of digital ID will be necessary to access the metaverse and to make digital payments,” which is connected to the idea of digital money via the introduction of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Hinchliffe cited a 2021 report by the Bank for International Settlements, which stated, “Identification at some level is … central in the design of CBDCs. This calls for a CBDC that is account-based and ultimately tied to a digital identity.” ‘Internet of Brains’ may ‘connect’ brains to ‘online data networks’ by 2050 According to the RAND Corporation-U.K. Defence report, the metaverse will lead to the creation of “a more interconnected global society emerging via virtual reality.” There may also be not one, but multiple, metaverses, which may “come to function almost like new countries … that exist in cyberspace rather than in physical locations but have complex economic and political systems that interact with the physical world.” This “may reduce the importance of national and individual identities and change how societies define and shape their cultural identities,” RAND states. “If you can’t physically invade a country to establish a New World Order or a One World Government, why not create a digital one that reduces ‘national & individual identities’ and then install a cyber-government of unelected technocrats?” Hinchliffe said. RAND also suggested the metaverse may include technology that allows users to “store and enforce the rules” they set “about what is allowed to come into their awareness, what takes up their time and what information is shared about their activities.” “The changing relationships between individual end users and those controlling virtual environments have led some to argue that ‘our sense of physical identity, time and agency will become subject to entirely new paradigms where the gateways to these experiences might be controlled by interests other than citizens,’” the report states. This may lead to an “internet of bodies” that may also ultimately lead to an “‘internet of brains’, i.e. human brains connected to the internet to facilitate direct brain-to-brain communication and enable access to online data networks,” leading to “the potential emergence of ‘trans-humanism’ within the 2050 timeframe,” according to the report. The report says those who opt out of such a system may be marginalized: “Given the direct embedding of technology into human cognitive, physical and psychological functions, substantial levels of human augmentation may ‘[blur] the notions of identity and of what it means to be human’, introducing new normative lenses on humanity and producing new stigma for those not seen as attaining those norms.” What’s more, “manipulations experienced in a digital environment may influence an individual’s physical or ‘real-world’ behaviours, potentially challenging established sociocultural institutions such as democratic political systems,” the report adds. Fitts rejected these visions. “From my point of view, the metaverse hypers are the marketing division of what I call the ‘Great Poisoning.’ Best to ignore it and teach children the joys of being healthy and building real wealth,” she said. “There is perhaps no better description of the metaverse than a painless transhumanist concentration camp, as Aldous Huxley predicted nearly six decades ago,” Bruner said.

https://expose-news.com/2024/04/21/the-end-of-humanity-as-planned-by-the-global-leaders/ Did you know there is an official agenda, one which is heavily promoted by the World Economic Forum to replace the human race with robots, cyborgs and AI? Their plan is to end the era of humanity and usher in a new era of neo-humanity, in which people are a mix of man and machine and our thoughts and emotions will be monitored by AI. Stop World Control, who ask us “Is that the world you want for yourself and your children?” have just released a short film THE END OF HUMANITY” with the intention that it will serve as a warning to mankind, to prevent this nefarious plan and to save the human race from both eradication and from this extreme form of slavery.” We have shared the film today which can be viewed following this introduction from Stop World Control: Ending humanity to ‘save the planet’ Many of us have seen the popular science fiction movies about robots taking over the world and eradicating humanity. But little do we know that this is exactly what is being prepared by the global leaders. It is what they are promoting, developing, financing and calling for, all around the world. The globalists even claim that this is the only way to save the Earth from total collapse. Without exiting the era of mankind and entering into the era of NEO-HUMANITY, the world is doomed, they say. One of their arguments is that humans are the cause of climate change, and must therefore be replaced with artificial alternatives to “save the planet”. This worldwide reformation is called “The Fourth Industrial Revolution” and is intended to completely digitize every aspect of life on Earth. Our film “THE END OF HUMANITY” exposes this global agenda, which is being powerfully promoted with massive support from the most powerful organizations worldwide. This is not just a film. This is reality. Klaus Schwab, founder and chairman of the World Economic Forum, stated during the recent World Government Summit in Dubai: “The future is already here. It’s coming like a tsunami! This Fourth Industrial Revolution will not only change everything we do, but it will have an impact on who we are.”Major developments are underway to transplant the human personality into robotic carriers, to give man artificial immortality. This is the ultimate dream of the elites: to become immortal. Robots are already replacing nurses, social workers, psychological assistants, doctors, cashiers, cooks, law enforcement, etc., in several areas of the world. The first computer chips are already being implanted into humans. The blending of man with machine is a reality, while AI is taking the world by storm, removing millions of human jobs as we speak. The horrifying thing is that specifically those sensitive jobs where people need a human touch, true understanding and emotional support are being replaced with robots. Can you imagine being taken care of by a robot in the hospital or nursing home? That’s exactly what is happening. Removing the human experience, which is so precious, beautiful and deep, and replacing it with unfeeling robotic alternatives. Inserting thoughts and emotions into everyone At the same time, technologies are being installed in every nation of the world that will continually record all the thoughts, emotions and dreams of everyone. These technologies even have the ability to insert thoughts and emotions into the population. That is not a conspiracy theory, as it is publicly stated by the former president of Chile, Sebastian Pinera, and by the Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum, Ida Auken, former minister of the environment of Denmark. In Europe, the public ‘School TV’ tells kids how ‘cool’ it is to have a chip in your brain. Google is organizing symposia declaring how humans will become one with computers, while the CEO of Nokia says that, in a few years, everyone will have their smartphones inside their body. This means that every detail of our lives can be constantly monitored. Meanwhile, the World Economic Forum hosts conferences about ‘brain transparency’, discussing how all our most intimate, personal data will be stored in the cloud and controlled by Big Tech. All this falls in line with the announcement of the WEF that by 2030, no one will have any privacy. Klaus Schwab says we will have to get used to a society of “full transparency”, where everything we think, feel and dream is monitored. The film “THE END OF HUMANITY” is a warning to mankind, intended to prevent this nefarious plan and to save the human race, from both eradication and from this extreme form of slavery. Sources: Stop World Control – https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/supportStop World Control – The End Of Humanity –As Planned By The Global Leaders – https://stopworldcontrol.com/endhumanity/

"Covid was used to terrorize the world, convince them that we need some giant protector state that actually has some sort of supranational ability, and then suspend civil liberties as long as they need to be suspended... at the whim of funding agencies who have no criminal accountability." "These things are set up to be terror campaigns, to modify the public's willingness to give up their liberties."

💥New Free Flyer💥 The dangers of 5G. The flyer links to our article below. There have been a myriad of studies showing the adverse effects of RFR (radio frequency radiation) exposure on the human body...... View full article + video content here: www.itsy.pub/5g Direct download 2 flyers per A4 page here (https://didyouknow.ink/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/5G-Double-A4-flyer.pdf). Direct download A5 flyer here (https://didyouknow.ink/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/5G-A5-Flyer.pdf). View our other free downloadable awareness flyers and stickers or shirts at cost price here: www.didyouknow.ink/downloads Check out out website at: www.DidYouKnow.ink

https://expose-news.com/2024/04/19/japanese-study-finds-mrna-injections-cause-cancer/ A newly published Japanese study confirms UK Professor Angus Dalgleish’s concerns about mRNA injections causing cancer.  After the findings of the study were published, Australian Professor Ian Brighthope has classified the injections as class one carcinogens. More than a year ago, Professor Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a renowned oncologist practising in the UK, first published his concerns that his patients with melanoma were relapsing after several years of being in remission. “I could find none of the usual causes but on further investigation, I realised that they had all had a booster covid vaccine between three weeks and three months before their cancer’s resurgence, the time in which their immune repression fails,” he wrote in The Conservative Woman on Monday. After raising the alarm that the vaccine boosters could induce cancer relapse, he became aware of literally dozens of people who had not had cancer before developing leukaemia and lymphomas after the boosters. In November 2022, Prof. Dalgleish wrote an open letter to the editor-in-chief of the medical journal The BMJ, urging the journal that harmful effects of Covid injections be “aired and debated immediately” because cancers and other diseases are rapidly progressing among “boosted” people. A few weeks later, he reported that other oncologists had contacted him to say they were seeing the same phenomenon of the recurrence of cancer in many melanoma patients who had been stable for long periods. “Since pointing this out publicly I have been contacted by many physicians and patients from all over the globe saying that they are not only seeing the same phenomenon but also an increase in other cancers especially colorectal, pancreatic, renal and ovarian,” he wrote at the beginning of this week. Many people had covid vaccines against their will, Prof. Dalgleish said. “Others gave in to the bullying of the NHS and GPs who hounded them with texts and calls (which I myself received regularly) about the importance of having a booster even though they presented no evidence that it could be beneficial.” Adding, “Having worked in vaccine development for a decade I remembered an adage that if a vaccine needs a booster, it doesn’t work!” In his latest article, Prof. Dalgleish highlighted several sources of evidence that have proved his concerns to be justified.  One source being a paper from Japan published last week. “It was available on a pre-publication server last year but now it has been peer-reviewed and published in Cureus. Titled ‘Increased age adjusted cancer mortality after the third mRNA lipid nanoparticle vaccine dose during the covid pandemic in Japan’,” he said. The results are astounding. It shows there was a deficit for all cancers in the year 2020 when the first and second covid waves occurred. In 2021 there was an excess of deaths of 2.2 per cent and a 1.1 per cent increase in cancers. However, by 2022 the excess deaths had increased 9.6 per cent and cancer by 2.1 per cent. This paper was completed and published before the 2023 figures release which will almost certainly be much worse. What is remarkable here is that we are talking mortality, that is deaths from cancer not incidence of it. So what is the cause of this sudden increase? It is revealed in the title of the paper! Massive cancer deaths study vindicates my warnings over covid boosters, The Conservative Woman, 15 April 2024 In an article published on Wednesday, retired Australian medical practitioner Professor Ian Brighthope highlighted the same Japanese paper and said: Today, on behalf of my professional friends and medical colleagues, I declare the mRNA vaccines to be class one carcinogens. mRNA is also a broad-spectrum mutagen. mRNA must be banned internationally. mRNA is a class one carcinogen, Ian Brighthope, 17 April 2024 He then went on to explain what carcinogens are, the process of carcinogenicity and how carcinogens are classified before inviting readers to make up their own minds about how carcinogenic mRNA injections are based on the findings of the Japanese study. Below are some extracts from Prof. Brighthope’s article but we encourage readers to read his informative article in full. Carcinogens and Carcinogenicity Carcinogens are substances, organisms or agents capable of causing cancer by altering the cellular, genetic and epigenetic mechanisms within the body, leading to the transformation of normal cells into cancer cells. These agents can be chemical substances, viruses or even certain types of radiation therapies used to treat cancer. Carcinogens do not necessarily cause cancer in every case or under all circumstances. Factors such as the amount and duration of exposure, the individual’s genetic makeup and exposure to other environmental factors play a significant role in determining whether a person exposed to a carcinogen will ultimately develop cancer. Moreover, not all mutations caused by carcinogens lead to cancer; only certain mutations in specific genes that regulate cell growth, apoptosis, and DNA repair may result in uncontrolled cell proliferation and cancer. The process of carcinogenicity, also known as carcinogenesis or tumour genesis, involves multiple stages where normal cells undergo a series of changes at the cellular, genetic, and epigenetic levels, resulting in abnormal cell division and the formation of cancer. Breast Cancer Prevention Partners: Carcinogenesis | The transformation of normal cells to cancer cells, 13 November 2013 (2 mins) Classification of Carcinogens Carcinogens can be classified based on their mode of action into genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens. Genotoxic carcinogens directly interact with DNA and/or the cellular apparatus, affecting the integrity of the genome. Non-genotoxic carcinogens exert their effects through mechanisms that do not involve direct DNA damage. International Agency for Research on Cancer (“IARC”) Classification The IARC Monographs identify factors that can increase the risk of human cancer, including lifestyle factors. Interdisciplinary working groups of expert scientists review the published studies and evaluate the weight of the evidence that an agent can increase the risk of cancer. Agents are then categorised as carcinogenic, probably or possibly carcinogenic, or not carcinogenic to humans, based on the strength of the evidence. The IARC Working Group also considers the body of evidence as a whole, to reach an overall evaluation of the carcinogenicity of the agent to humans. The categorisation of an agent into one of four groups is a matter of scientific judgment that reflects the strength of the evidence derived from studies in humans and in experimental animals and from mechanistic and other relevant data. The four IARC groups are: • Group 1: Sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity, the highest IARC classification for carcinogenicity. [Agents that are judged to fall into this category are also referred to as “class one carcinogens.”] • Group 2A (probably carcinogenic to humans) or Group 2B (possibly carcinogenic to humans): Limited evidence of carcinogenicity, a positive association. Group 3: Inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity. Group 4: Evidence suggesting lack of carcinogenicity. World Cancer Research Fund (“WCRF”) and American Institute for Cancer Research (“AICR”) Classification The 2007 WCRF and AICR Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective report and subsequent tumour-specific updates are based on systematic reviews of the scientific literature for food, nutrition and physical activity. A WCRF and AICR Panel judged and graded the evidence into five categories: convincing, probable, limited (suggestive evidence), limited (no conclusion) or unlikely to affect cancer risk. Decide for yourselves the level of carcinogenicity that characterises mRNA After describing how carcinogens are classified, Prof. Brighthope invited readers to judge for themselves how mRNA injections should be classified by sharing the conclusion from the recently published Japanese study: Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukaemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive [Estrogen Receptors Alpha-sensitive] cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than covid-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown. Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan, Cureaus, 8 April 2024 As the title of his article stated, Prof. Brighthope classifies mRNA injections as a “class one carcinogen.” Sources for this article include: mRNA is a class one carcinogen & a broad-spectrum mutagen, The Liberty Beacon, 18 April 2024

In a report for Infowars, Greg Reese says that the Moderna patent filed in 2020 lists variations for the technology that was used in their covid jabs and this technology contains self assembled nanoparticles. He supports these findings by citing Todd Callender’s team who have concluded that the jabs contain a variety of synthetic pathogens that can be released with external 5G frequencies and each have a catalogued IP address. Callender’s research shows that the technology is turning the human body into an antenna which can output energy. Meaning that humans are being turned into batteries to fuel the digital A.I. prison, Greg claims.

https://expose-news.com/2024/04/16/bird-flu-does-not-transmit-to-humans/ Featured image: A person in Texas caught bird flu after mixing with dairy cattle. Should we be worried? The Conversation, 8 April 2024 The Bird flu virus has been modified in laboratories in the USA using gain-of-function to make it infectious and transmissible among mammals. This research has been occurring for at least a decade.  During that time there have been laboratory accidents, one of which is known to have happened at the end of 2019. It is these laboratory accidents that pose a risk of infection to humans and mammals, not the naturally occurring bird flu. On 25 March 2024, the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) was notified about a case of human infection with an influenza A (H5N1), bird flu, virus by the national authorities of Vietnam. According to the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005, a human infection caused by a novel influenza A virus subtype is an event that has the potential for high public health impact and must be notified to the WHO. WHO will then assess the risk posed to the general population based on available information.  In the case of the Vietnamese, WHO assessed the risk of this virus as low. On 1 April, a person in Texas tested positive for H5N1 bird flu. The Texan worked with dairy cows “presumably infected with H5N1 bird flu viruses,” the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) said.  This was the second human case of H5N1 bird flu reported in the United States. There was a previous case in 2022 in Colorado in a poultry worker. The case of the Texan was also reported to WHO. WHO assessed the public health risk to the general population posed by this virus to be low and for occupationally exposed persons, the risk of infection is considered low-to-moderate. Related: Bird flu in 2005 was used to begin the biggest power grab in history – now it’s back Last week we published an article by Dr. Joseph Mercola who cautioned: “As we move forward, it is important for to keep an eye on the narratives we’re being fed. If bird flu becomes a human epidemic or pandemic, there are plenty of reasons to suspect it’s a weaponised virus, and the “solution” offered will be the same as that for covid-19: ‘Get vaccinated’.” Dr. Mercola also offered some advice on what to do should they release such a virus. John Leake agrees that any H5N1 epidemic would likely be due to a virus created in a laboratory. “H5N1 does NOT efficiently transmit to humans and therefore poses little risk to humans,” he notes. “Far more dangerous … is the possibility of a lab-modified H5N1 virus escaping from a laboratory.” A History of H5N1 Laboratory Accidents By John Leake Exactly one year ago, the investigative journalist and author, Alison Young, published a report in USA Today on an accident that occurred on 9 December 2019 at the University of Wisconsin’s Influenza Research Institute. The accident involved experiments with an H5N1 influenza virus that had been modified through gain-of-function (“GoF”) to make it transmissible among ferrets. The research team leader – a renowned virologist named Yoshihiro Kawaoka – had gained international attention (or notoriety) for his controversial GoF research on H5N1. As Alison Young reported: … in late 2011 the world learned that two scientific teams – one in Wisconsin, led by virologist Yoshihiro Kawaoka, and another in the Netherlands, led by virologist Ron Fouchier – had potentially pushed the virus in that direction. Each of these labs had created H5N1 viruses that had gained the ability to spread through the air between ferrets, the animal model used to study how flu viruses might behave in humans. The ultimate goal of this work was to help protect the world from future pandemics, and the research was supported with words and funding by two of the most prominent scientists in the United States: Dr. Francis S. Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Kawaoka contended it would be “irresponsible not to study” how the virus might evolve in nature. “Some people have argued that the risks of such studies – misuse and accidental release, for example – outweigh the benefits. I counter that H5N1 viruses circulating in nature already pose a threat,” he said at the time. In November 2013, a needlestick accident happened on Kawaoka’s research team, followed by failure to adhere to the established quarantine rules. Though no human infection resulted from this accident, it was nevertheless alarming. Young’s report continues: By 2014, there was a growing discomfort at the highest levels of the US government about the risk of an accident with an engineered virus. Wisconsin’s needlestick incident, which drew questions within NIH but wasn’t publicly known, was soon followed by a series of high-profile accidents at federal labs in 2014 – from safety breaches with anthrax and avian influenza at the CDC to the discovery of forgotten vials of smallpox that had been kept for decades in a storage room on the NIH campus. In October 2014, citing these federal laboratory incidents, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy announced a moratorium on new federal funding for certain gain-of-function research while the risks and benefits of the controversial experiments were studied. The funding pause remained in place for three years until it was finally lifted in December 2017. But it was only in 2019 that some of the halted experiments were quietly allowed to begin again under a revised federal oversight process, which was criticised for keeping secret the details of the new experiments and the basis for the government approvals. The second accident on Kawaoka’s team occurred less than a year after GoF experiments were allowed to resume. This time, a laboratory researcher in training was working with ferrets infected with the GoF-modified H5N1 when his respirator hose was discovered to have detached from his hood, allowing him to breathe the possibly contaminated air in the cabinet. Again, the quarantine rules were not properly followed, and nor was the incident promptly reported to the NIH. Though the accident purportedly did not result in a human infection, it nevertheless raises many questions about the prudence of manipulating the H5N1 virus in a laboratory in order to make it infectious and transmissible among mammals. Alison Young’s report prompted me to start reading her book, ‘Pandora’s Gamble: Lab Leaks, Pandemics, and a World at Risk’, published on 25 April 2023. Young has a long history of researching and reporting on biolabs and their checkered past. Most laboratory manipulation of pathogens is purportedly done to develop vaccines against them in the event that their natural iterations should ever evolve to infect humans, but this rationale is highly questionable if not downright mendacious. Indeed, on 18 December 2013, the Foundation for Vaccine Research wrote a letter to the European Commission, signed by 56 scientists (including Nobel Laureates) in which they sharply criticised the GoF experiments on H5N1 by virologist, Ron Fouchier. The 56 scientists vehemently express their opinion that naturally occurring H5N1 does NOT efficiently transmit to humans and therefore poses little risk to humans. Far more dangerous, they claim, is the possibility of a lab-modified H5N1 virus escaping from a laboratory. The scientists refer to the resurgence of H1N1 influenza in 1977 after a 20-year hiatus, most likely after escaping from a laboratory in the former Soviet Union. About the Author John Leake is a true crime author and investigative journalist.  Among the books he has written is ‘The Courage to Face Covid-19: Preventing Hospitalisation and Death While Battling the Biopharmaceutical Complex’ which he co-authored with Dr. Peter McCullough.  Leake often publishes articles on Dr. McCullough’s Substack page titled ‘Courageous Discourse’ which you can subscribe to and follow HERE.

https://expose-news.com/2024/04/16/lettuce-virus-x-and-the-weaponisation-of-food/ In an article titled ‘Virus X is Not What Anyone is Expecting’ posted on her Substack, Karen Kingston highlighted an interview from more than 20 years ago with the late Michael Crichton, author of many bestselling novels including ‘Jurassic Park’. Crichton’s books have sold over 200 million copies worldwide, and over a dozen have been adapted into films. On 26 November 2002, Crichton was interviewed by American journalist and talk show host Charlie Rose about his book ‘Prey’ which was published that month. He also discussed “the dangers of self-replicating biosynthetic pathogens (or what we call genetically modified viruses), gene editing and the dangers of highly advanced biotechnologies,” Kingston said. The synopsis of Prey reads: In the Nevada desert, an experiment has gone horribly wrong. A cloud of nanoparticles – micro-robots – has escaped from the laboratory. This cloud is self-sustaining and self-reproducing. It is intelligent and learns from experience. For all practical purposes, it is alive. It has been programmed as a predator. It is evolving swiftly, becoming more deadly with each passing hour. Every attempt to destroy it has failed. And we are the prey. As Britannica notes, although he was often criticised by the scientific community for being sensationalist, Crichton was known for the careful research that went into his work. For example, he meticulously studied the science underlying the premise of Jurassic Park. “Crichton continued to postulate on the effects of scientific advancements in works of science fiction such as Prey (2002), about nanotechnology; Next (2005), in which he returned to the blurry ethical boundaries of genetic engineering; and the 2005 thriller State of Fear, his polemical take on global warming,” Britannica notes. Crichton described his book Prey as follows: In the case of Prey, I was interested in knowing where three trends might be going – distributed programming, biotechnology, and nanotechnology. As a concept, nanotechnology dates back to a 1959 speech by Richard Feynman called There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom. Forty years later, the field is still very much in its infancy. But practical applications are starting to appear. Nanotechniques are already being used to make sunscreens, stain-resistant fabrics, and composite materials in cars. Soon they will be used to make computers and storage devices of extremely small size. And some of the long-anticipated “miracle” products have started to appear as well. In 2002, one company was manufacturing self-cleaning window glass; another made a nanocrystal wound dressing with antibiotic and anti-inflammatory properties. Prey: In His Own Words In 2002, Michael Crichton wrote an article ‘Could Tiny Machines Rule the World’ for Parade magazine that coincided with the release of his novel, Prey.  In the following excerpt, Crichton speculates about how nanotechnology could change our world.  We were unable to find a copy of the original article published by Parade on 24 November 2002, however, there is an extract published on the Michael Crichton website and also by The Fountain magazine, a publication controlled by the Gülen or Hizmet movement. Crichton says: “These organisms [self-reproducing tiny computers] will be created by nanotechnology, perhaps the most radical technology in human history: the quest to build man-made machines of extremely small size, on the order of 100 nanometres, or 100/billionths of a meter. Such machines would be 1,000 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair. Experts predict that these tiny machines will provide everything from miniaturised computer components to new medical treatments to new military weapons. In the 21st century, they will change our world totally.” Nanotechnology, The Fountain, 1 July 2003 Two days after his article was published in Parade, Crichton was interviewed by Charlie Rose. “I’m quite worried about the whole area of self-reproducing technologies – which is already biotechnology … [With genetic engineering] conceivably, just conceivably, if there was some kind of a virus that interfered with the photosynthesis, in enough plants … everything’s gone. The biosphere is essentially wiped out,” he warned. Michael Crichton interview on Charlie Rose about ‘Prey’, 26 November 2002, (32 mins) If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it and read the transcript on Charlie Rose’s website HERE. What Crichton was referring to is self-replicating biosynthetic viruses that could infect plants and hijack the photosynthesis process, Kingston wrote. “Please see THIS 2022 report on self-replicating biosynthetic pathogens being bred into plants to hijack the photosynthesis process.” Lettuce Virus X In 2008, Springer Link published an article about a virus infecting lettuce in Tehran province in Iran. The article stated: Based on particle morphology, physicochemical properties and the complete genome sequence, this virus is a member of a new species in the genus Potexvirus, for which the name lettuce virus X (LeVX) is proposed. Biological assays using an infectious cDNA clone and a wild-type isolate of LeVX revealed that the virus, despite reaching high concentrations in all lettuce cultivars tested, does not cause symptoms in lettuce. Dizadji, A., Koohi-Habibi, M., Izadpanah, K. et al. Characterisation of lettuce virus X, a new potexvirus infecting lettuce in Iran. Arch Virol 153, 1867–1875 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-008-0191-x For 180 euros, LeVX virus inoculum – any part of the pathogen that can initiate infection – can be purchased from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (“DSMZ”). “There are NO known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for [LeVX],” DSMZ states. DSMZ claims to be the world’s most diverse collection of biological resources – bacteria, archaea, protists, yeasts, fungi, bacteriophages, plant viruses, genomic bacterial DNA as well as human and animal cell lines – providing all users with the necessary legal certainty in the handling of their bioresources under the Nagoya Protocol, a 2010 supplementary agreement to the Convention on Biological Diversity signed at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Related:  Under the guise of biodiversity, they want to genetically manipulate all living things According to Wikipedia, DSMZ is a global supplier of microorganisms and cell cultures for university, non-university and industrial research with more than 10,000 customers in over 80 countries.  It is a member of several international organisations such as the European Culture Collections’ Organisation (“ECCO”), the World Federation for Culture Collections (“WFCC”) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (“GBIF”), which is a partner in the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data. Related: Global Public Private Partnership on The Exposé At the end of March, the Tennessee House of Representatives passed a bill dubbed the “House Lettuce bill” which defines any food that “contains a vaccine or vaccine material” as a drug under Tennessee law and the “food” would have to be labelled as a “vaccine.” “Lettuce is being weaponised with mRNA, not medicated,” Kingston said. Lettuce Virus X, or what we call “mRNA Vaccine Lettuce” includes mRNA viruses that hijack the chloroplasts of green plants to produce highly infectious pathogens instead of oxygen. Please see this report of the China National GeneBank Plant Databases and Lettuce Virus X. [Note: The ‘Lettice Virus X’ article Kingston linked to is behind a paywall.  However, we were able to find Lettuce Virus X on the China National GeneBank so we can assume she is using the term, abbreviated to LeVX, as described above.] If you’d like to better understand synthetic biology, Lettuce Virus X, mRNA gene editing technologies, and how you can protect you and your community, please subscribe to The Kingston Report [on Substack]. Virus X is Not What Anyone is Expecting, Karen Kingston, 15 April 2024

https://expose-news.com/2024/04/15/massive-rallies-break-out-in-japan-against-whos-pandemic-treaty-dont-underestimate-the-japanese/ “Let’s stop the third atomic bomb with our hands, in the hands of the Japanese people!” April 13, 2024, will be etched in the annals of modern Japanese history as tens of thousands of citizens across the nation came together in a series of pandemic rallies. The protests centered on the widespread opposition to the Pandemic Treaty, with escalating concerns over “infectious disease” and “public health” becoming potent tools for an unprecedented push towards what is perceived by many as a totalitarian surveillance society. Source The following was written by Aussie 17 in Pharma Files. Massive Rallies Break Out in Japan Against WHO’s Pandemic Treaty. – ‘Don’t Underestimate the Japanese’ From the bustling streets of Ikebukuro to the gatherings at Higashi-Ikebukuro Central Park, the sheer scale of participation speaks volumes. Organizers aimed for a monumental turnout of 100,000 protesters to demand answers on crucial issues, such as the stark increase in excess deaths and the lack of transparency on the adverse effects following vaccinations. The protest not just opposed potential mandatory vaccinations but also the perceived overreach of health authorities and their ties with global pharma, echoing a distressing sentiment of disenfranchisement among the populace. Demonstrators criticized the lack of explanations for a sharp increase in excess deaths and demanded accountability and clarity on vaccine-related casualties. Eminent speakers, including Professor Masayasu Inoue and modern history researcher Chikatsu Hayashi, provided compelling pre-demonstration speeches that laid bare the concerning dynamics between global health authorities and pharmaceutical agendas. Professor Inoue highlighted the concerning trend of our health being weaponized in what he termed as “a third world war fought with information.” He urged the public to resist introducing genetic vaccines into their bodies, implicating a significant portion of WHO’s funding comes from pharmaceutical giants and private interests like the Bill Gates Foundation. This follows Japan’s Message to the world delivered by Prof Inoue a few days ago. Modern history researcher Prof Chikatsu Hayashi’s address was a rallying cry to resist the encroaching shadows of global totalitarianism, symbolically referring to the proactive stance against it as “stopping the third atomic bomb with our hands.” His poignant discourse highlighted a national movement poised against not only the Pandemic Treaty but also the underlying structures threatening Japan’s sovereignty and the well-being of its citizens. April 13 marked not just a protest against a treaty but a stand against a future where health becomes a lever for control and surveillance. The massive turnout signifies a critical moment in Japan’s civic engagement. It’s a call from its people for autonomy, transparency, and the reassessment of global health governance that resonates beyond its borders. Today, Japan stands at the forefront, questioning, challenging, and seeking change for a future where health policy respects national sovereignty and individual rights. Video Sources here, here, here. Don’t Underestimate the Japanese! Translation of the X post below: “The chants from the front group were far away! There was no megaphone, so I barked in my normal voice! A huge number of friends! It is supposed to be the largest demonstration in Japanese history. Don’t mess with me, WHO! Don’t underestimate the Japanese!” Source: PharmaFiles by Aussie 17 – https://www.aussie17.com