Search Results

3909 items found

  • Doctors are BEGGING parents not to give their children deadly COVID-19 vaccines Prominent doctors are literally begging parents not to give their children the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines because doing so could lead to their deaths. One of those prominent doctors is Dr. Syed Haider, a board-certified specialist in internal medicine. Haider spoke with Kristi Leigh of InfoWars on “The War Room” to talk about how outraged he feels about parents giving their children the experimental and deadly COVID-19 vaccines. (Related: Giving COVID-19 vaccines to INFANTS is unprecedented, despite mainstream media claims to the contrary.) “I have never felt this outraged and upset with what’s happening in our country,” said Haider. “I literally feel like I have to beg people, ‘Don’t give this to your babies. You will regret it, okay? This is the worst possible thing you can inject into them. You’re injecting a poison into innocent babies who, you know … they could die, right?” Haider added that even if the vaccinated children don’t immediately die due to the vaccines, they will very likely have to deal with lifelong effects. “It could affect their fertility, it could cause autoimmune diseases, it [could] cause cancer, it could cause heart disease,” said Haider. “We know all of this already from the adult trials. We know the risks of these things.” Government still distributing COVID-19 vaccines for children under five Despite the concerns of many doctors and parents around the country, the federal government is still pushing through with the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines for children as young as six months old. President Joe Biden’s administration has already made 10 million vaccine doses for children available in hospitals, clinics, pharmacies and community health centers across the country, and will likely purchase millions more. Biden called this moment “a monumental step forward,” and bragged about how America “is now the first country in the world to offer safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines for children as young as six months old.” Health workers already started giving vaccinations to this age group. Fortunately, data on the ground strongly suggests that not as many parents are interested in giving their kids the vaccine. A poll conducted in April showed that less than 20 percent of parents with children under five were eager to give their kids vaccine doses right away. These early adopters were the outliers, as 27 percent of parents said they will definitely not get their kids vaccinated. These parents believe there is not enough information about the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines to justify giving them to their children. Many other families believe that they can live with the coronavirus, especially since many of them think America has already achieved herd immunity and many of their children have already been infected, with most experiencing only mild symptoms. Jen Wilkerson, 28, of West St. Paul, Minnesota, said she did not plan to get her four-year-old son vaccinated. Her son, Jaxson, developed lumps in his leg following two other vaccines for different diseases. Furthermore, the boy experienced an asymptomatic case of COVID-19 when Jen herself contracted it last year. “He’s a little window licker,” she said. “With how strong his immune system is, I don’t feel the need for him to get vaccinated.” Learn more about how the COVID-19 vaccines affect children at Watch this episode of “The War Room” on InfoWars as host Kristi Leigh talks to Dr. Syed Haider about the consequences of giving COVID-19 vaccines to children. This video is from the InfoWars channel on

  • Why Can’t People See Through The COVID Con? Written by Dr Joseph Mercola Despite the statistics and mathematical models dramatically overrating the risk of the virus, and the obvious side effects of the vaccines – many are not capable of seeing it. This is why you should continue to push back, before this monster devours its own child. Professor Mattias Desmet, a Belgian psychologist with a master’s degree in statistics, gained worldwide recognition toward the end of 2021, when he presented the concept of “mass formation” as an explanation for the absurd and irrational behavior we were seeing with regard to the COVID pandemic and its countermeasures. He also warned that mass formation gives rise to totalitarianism, which is the topic of his new book, “The Psychology of Totalitarianism.” Desmet’s work was further popularized by Dr. Robert Malone, whose appearance on the Joe Rogan podcast was viewed by about 50 million people. But as the search term “mass formation” exploded in popularity, Google responded by manipulating the search engine results in an attempt to discredit Desmet and show people in their search results information that would cause them to discount the importance of this work. Why? Because Google is at the core of the global cabal and movement toward totalitarianism. Understanding The Psychology Of The Times Is Crucial Those who refuse to learn from history are bound to repeat it, they say, and this appears particularly pertinent in the present day because, as explained by Desmet, if we don’t understand how mass formation occurs and what it leads to, we cannot prevent it. How did Desmet reach the conclusion that we were in the process of mass formation? He explains: “In the beginning of the Corona crisis, back in February 2020, I started to study the statistics on the mortality rates of the virus, the infection fatality rates, the case fatality rate and so on, and immediately, I got the impression — and with me, several world-famous statisticians, such as John Ioannidis of Stanford, for instance — that the statistics and mathematical models used dramatically overrated the danger of the virus. Immediately, I wrote an opinion paper trying to bring some of the mistakes to people’s attention. But, I noticed immediately that people just didn’t want to know. It was as if they didn’t see even the most blatant mistakes at the level of the statistics that were used. People just were not capable of seeing it.” This early experience made him decide to focus on the psychological mechanisms at play in society, and he became convinced that what we were seeing were in fact the effects of a large-scale process of mass formation, because the most salient characteristic of this psychological trend is that it makes people radically blind to everything that goes against the narrative they believe in. They basically become incapable of distancing themselves from their beliefs, and therefore cannot take in or evaluate new data. Desmet continues: “Another very specific characteristic is that this process of mass formation makes people willing to radically sacrifice everything that is important to them — even their health, their wealth, the health of their children, the future of their children. When someone is in the grip of a process of mass formation, he becomes radically willing to sacrifice all his individual interest. A third characteristic, to name only a few, is that once people are in the grip of a process of mass formation, they typically show a tendency of cruelty towards people who do not buy into the narrative, or do not go along with the narrative. They typically do so as if it is an ethical duty. In the end, they are typically inclined, first, to stigmatize, and then, to eliminate, to destroy, the people who do not go along with the masses. And that’s why it is so extremely important to understand the psychological mechanisms at work, because if you understand the mechanisms at work, you can avoid the mass formation to become so deep that people reach this critical point in which they really are fanatically convinced that they should destroy everyone that does not go along with them. So, it’s extremely important to understand the mechanism. If you understand it, you can make sure that the crowd, the mass, will first destroy itself, or will exhaust itself, before it starts to destroy the people that do not go along with the mass. So, it’s of crucial importance, and that’s what my book describes. It describes how a mass, a crowd, emerges in a society, under which conditions it emerges, what the mechanisms of the process of mass formation are, and what you can do about it. That’s extremely important. I will mention this from the beginning. Usually, it is impossible to wake up the masses. Once a process of mass formation emerges in a society, it’s extremely difficult to wake the masses up. But, [waking them up is] important, [because] you can avoid the masses and their leaders becoming so fanatically convinced of their narrative that they start to destroy the people who do not go along with them.” Indeed, to those of us who did not fall under the spell of the irrational COVID narrative, the cruelty with which political leadership, media and people at large tried to force compliance was shockingly abhorrent. Many were physically attacked, and some even killed, simply for not wearing a face mask, which we knew was a useless prevention strategy. Historical Context For Mass Hypnosis It is easier to understand what mass formation is if you consider it as mass hypnosis, because they’re not merely similar, they’re identical, Desmet says. Mass formation is a kind of hypnosis that emerges when specific conditions are met. And, disturbingly, these conditions, and the hypnotic trance that emerges, almost always precede the rise of totalitarian systems. While totalitarianism and a classical dictatorship share certain features, there are distinct differences at the psychological level. According to Desmet, a classical dictatorship, at the psychological level, is very primitive. It’s a society that is frightened of a small group, a dictatorial regime, because of its aggressive potential. Totalitarianism, on the other hand, arises from a very different psychological mechanism. Interestingly, the totalitarian state didn’t actually exist before the 20th century. It’s a relatively new phenomenon, and it’s based on mass formation or mass hypnosis. The conditions for this mass hypnotic state (listed below) were first met just before the emergence of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, so that’s our historical context. These conditions were again met just before the COVID crisis. What we’re seeing now is a different kind of totalitarianism, largely due to technological advancements that have created extremely effective tools to subconsciously influence the public. We now have very sophisticated tools with which to hypnotize far larger masses of people than they could in earlier times. But while our current-day totalitarianism is global rather than regional, and the information war more sophisticated than anything the Soviets or Nazi’s could muster, the basic psychological dynamics are still identical. Understanding Hypnosis So, what are those psychological dynamics? “Mass formation” is a clinical term that in layman’s jargon could simply be translated as a kind of mass hypnosis, which can occur once certain conditions are fulfilled. When you are being hypnotized, the first thing the hypnotist will do is to detach or withdraw your attention from the reality or environment around you. Then, through his hypnotic suggestion — usually a very simple narrative or sentence stated out loud — the hypnotist will focus your full attention on a single point, for instance, a moving pendulum or just his voice. From the perspective of the hypnotized person, it will seem as though reality has vanished. An extreme example of this is the use of hypnosis to make people insensitive to pain during surgery. In that situation, the patient’s mental focus is so narrow and intense, that they don’t notice that their body is being cut into. In the same way, it doesn’t matter how many people are injured by the COVID measures, because the focus is on COVID and everything else has vanished, in psychological terms. People can be killed for not wearing a mask and the hypnotized won’t raise an eyebrow. Children can die from starvation and friends can commit suicide from financial desperation — none of it will have a psychological impact on the hypnotized because to them, the plight of others doesn’t register. A perfect example of this psychological blinding to reality is how COVID jab deaths and injuries are simply unrecognized and not even considered to be causal. People will get the shot, suffer massive injuries, and say, “Thank goodness I got the shot or it would have been so much worse.” They cannot conceive the possibility that they were injured by the shot. I’ve even seen people express gratitude for the shot when someone they supposedly loved died within hours or days of getting it! It’s just mindboggling. The psychological dynamics of hypnosis does explain this irrational and otherwise incomprehensible behavior, but it’s still quite surreal. “Even while I know the mechanisms at work, I’m still baffled every time it happens,” Desmet says. “I almost can’t believe what I see. I know someone whose husband died a few days after the vaccine, during his sleep, from a heart attack. And I thought, ‘Now she will open her eyes and wake up.’ Not at all. She just continued in the same fanatic way — even more fanatic — talking about how happy we should be because we have this vaccine. Unbelievable, yes.” The Psychological Roots Of Mass Formation As mentioned, mass formation, or mass hypnosis, can occur when certain psychological conditions are present in a large-enough portion of society. The four central conditions that need to exist in order for mass formation to arise are: 1. Widespread loneliness and lack of social bonding, which leads to: 2. Experiencing life as meaningless, purposeless and senseless, and/or being faced with persistent circumstances that don’t make rational sense, which leads to: 3. Widespread free-floating anxiety and discontent (anxiety/discontent that has no apparent or distinct cause), which leads to: 4. Widespread free-floating frustration and aggression (frustration and aggression have no discernible cause), which results in feeling out of control How Mass Formation Emerges In A Society Once a large-enough portion of society feels anxious and out of control, that society becomes highly vulnerable to mass hypnosis. Desmet explains: “Social isolation, lack of meaning, free floating anxiety, frustration and aggression are highly aversive because if people feel anxious, without knowing what they feel anxious for, they typically feel out of control. They feel they cannot protect themselves from their anxiety. And, if under these conditions a narrative is distributed through the mass media, indicating an object of anxiety, and at the same time, providing a strategy to deal with the object of anxiety, then all this free-floating anxiety might connect to the object of anxiety. And, there might be a huge willingness to participate in a strategy to deal with the object of anxiety, no matter how absurd the strategy is. So, even if it is clear from the beginning — for everyone who wants to see it — that the strategy to deal with the object of anxiety might claim many more victims than the object of anxiety itself … even then, there might be this huge willingness to participate in a strategy to deal with the object of anxiety. That is the first step of every major mechanism of mass formation. Whether it concerned the Crusades, or the witch hunts, or the French Revolution, or the beginning of the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany, we see the same mechanism, time and time again. There is a lot of free-floating anxiety. Someone provides a narrative that indicates an object of anxiety and a strategy to deal with it. And then all the anxiety connects to the [proposed] object of anxiety. People participate in a strategy to deal with the object of anxiety that yields a first important psychological advantage, and from then on people have the impression that they can control their anxiety. It’s connected to an object and they have a strategy to deal with it.” The Problematic Social Bonding Of Mass Formation Once people who used to feel lonely, anxious and out of control start to participate in the strategy presented to them as the solution to their anxiety, a brand-new social bond emerges. This, then, reinforces the mass hypnosis, as they now no longer feel isolated and lonely. This reinforcement is a kind of mental intoxication, and is the real reason why people buy into the narrative, no matter how absurd. “They’ll continue to buy into the narrative, because it creates this new social bond,” Desmet says. While social bonding is a good thing, in this instance it becomes extremely destructive, because the free-floating frustration and aggression are still there, and need an outlet. These emotions need to be directed at someone. What’s worse, under the spell of mass formation, people lose their inhibitions and sense of proportion. So, as we’ve seen during the COVID pandemic, people will attack and lash out in the most irrational ways against anyone who doesn’t buy into the narrative. The underlying aggression will always be directed at the part of the population that isn’t hypnotized. Speaking in generalized terms, typically, once mass formation is taking place, about 30% of the population will be hypnotized — and this typically includes the leaders who pronounce the hypnotizing narrative to the public — 10 percent remain unhypnotized and do not buy into the narrative, and the majority, 60 percent, feel there’s something wrong with the narrative, but go along with it simply because they don’t want to stick out or cause trouble. Another problem with the social bonding that emerges is that the bond is not between individuals, but rather a bond between the individual and the collective. This gives rise to a feeling of fanatic solidarity with the collective, but there’s no solidarity toward any given individual. So, individuals are remorselessly sacrificed for the “greater good” of the faceless collective. This is taken from a long article. Read the rest here: theepochtimes

  • Purification: Virology’s Black Sheep PURITY: Relative freedom from extraneous matter in the finished product, whether or not harmful to the recipient or deleterious to the product. (21 CFR 600.3(r)) FDA Guidance Definition for vaccine purity The above definition for purity is taken from the FDA’s Guidance for Industry. According to the FDA, purity is considered relative freedom from extraneous matter. What is “relative freedom?” Relative implies that something is true to a certain degree. In other words, there is freedom from extraneous matter to a certain degree. However, in relation to purity, there can be no degrees of freedom from extraneous matter. A substance is either pure, meaning that it is free of all contaminants and foreign matter, or it is impure, meaning it is mixed with contamination and foreign matter. There is no such thing as purity to a certain extent yet you will commonly find discussions of purity within the “scientific” papers as if this can be the case. Terminology such as low purity, partially purified, somewhat purified, relatively purified, highly purified, etc. are thrown about as vague descriptors used to wiggle around a concept that is so simple and straight forward that most children can understand it. Something is either pure or impure. There is no in-between. The issue of purification is absolutely vital to the foundational problems regarding virology. In order to prove the very existence of the fictional creations we are supposed to fear, it must be shown that “viruses” exist in a purified and isolated state. However, purification is mostly ignored in any original “virus” study when it should be a prominent focus. If we are to believe that these invisible intracellular parasitic entities exist, we need to be able to observe them alone. As we can not observe “viruses” in nature nor with our own eyes, this means that it is essential that the particles assumed to be “viruses” are taken directly from the fluids of a sick human and then purified free of any contaminants, pollutants, foreign materials, etc. contained within so that nothing else remains other than the assumed “viral” particles. Only then could pathogenicity be proven by having a valid independent variable separated from everything else in order to establish a cause-and-effect relationship for the particles claimed as the causative agent. Only then would electron microscope images of just those particles with nothing else contained within the sample be valid as evidence. However, as you will see, virologists have admitted numerous times that “viruses” can not be purified and isolated directly from the fluids of a sick human. They state that “viruses” must be cultured with a host cell first before purification and isolation can occur. This creates many problems as: 1. The methods used to purify and isolate “viruses” are ineffective 2. “Viruses” can not be separated from exosomes and other MVB’s within the sample 3. The cell culture method is impure and the media and host cell DNA can not be purified away from the invisible “viruses” In this article, I will break these various problems down and show that, from their own sources, virology admits that complete purification and isolation of the assumed “viral” particles is an impossibility. ______________________________________________________________________________________________ As purification can NOT be achieved, virology lacks the physical particles necessary for use as an independent variable to vary and manipulate in order to determine cause and effect. There is NO direct evidence as to the existence of the particles assumed to be “virus” ever being found within humans. The only evidence is from indirect cell culture experimentation citing patterns of cell death known as the cytopathogenic effect (CPE) seen in the cells after being poisoned and starved for days which is then blamed on an invisible “virus.” As other contaminants, chemicals, and impurities remain within the cultured sample, there can be no certainty that the other substances within may be the potential cause of the CPE seen within the culture over the assumed “virus.” It is a fact that other substances will be there within the fluids, especially in any sample processed through cell culture, as can be seen from the exosome studies as well as from attempts to purify “viruses” from cell culture supernatant for vaccine use. The FDA admitted that there are other factors besides a “virus” which can cause the CPE seen which is instead blamed on the invisible “virus.” The cell culture method is by definition an impure process as many foreign elements, chemicals, and contaminants are added to the culture which can NOT be separated out. As virology admits that “viruses” can NOT be purified and isolated directly from the fluids of a sick human and must be cultured, there is NO purification that can ever be achieved by subjection to an impure process. Without purification, virology can NOT adhere to the scientific method and is thus a PSEUDOSCIENCE. We know this and virologists know this which is why purification methods are rarely performed and why this criteria is rarely discussed in virology papers. Purification is the black sheep of the virology family and it will remain as such until virology can find a way to do what it has been unable to do for well over 100 years.

  • STUNNING: At Today's Congressional Testimony, Dr. Deborah Birx Admits the Biden Admin's Vaccine Effi

    STUNNING: At Today's Congressional Testimony, Dr. Deborah Birx Admits the Biden Admin's Vaccine Efficacy Claims Were Based on 'Hope' Not Science Clip: Full Exchange:

  • The Spike Protein is a Cancer Trigger: It binds to the breast cancer and ovarian cancer gene, BRCA

    Cancers are now exploding: The spike protein attacks the bone marrow and your dividing stem cells, hence the increase in cancers It doesn’t matter which ‘vaccine’ you take, they all produce the same spike protein which attacks your cells This is a crime against humanity where we’re using a dangerous product that is harming our human body, harming our hormones, harming our reproductive organs

  • FAKE medicine: Over 90% of all medical interventions lack evidence to support their use, as the medi FAKE medicine: Over 90% of all medical interventions lack evidence to support their use, as the medical system implodes with error (Natural News) A new meta-analysis published in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology finds that there is NO high-quality evidence to support MOST modern healthcare interventions and pharmaceutical drugs used in hospitals today. According to the findings of this analysis, almost every single aspect of the medical system is a racket, a fraud. It’s not just the inhumane Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) protocols and the so-called vaccines that have failed the world. Almost every single pharmaceutical intervention approved since 2008 carries more risk than benefit. Up to 94% of medical interventions lack evidence to support their use. Meta-analysis finds 94% of medical interventions are lacking evidence to support their use The meta-analysis investigated 1,567 medical interventions studied within the Cochrane reviews. Most of the interventions had already been approved as “safe and effective” and are currently used throughout hospital systems and pharmacies nationwide; however, a shocking 94% of the interventions were not supported by high-quality evidence. In fact, the majority of the interventions carried more risk than benefit and were not recommended by the study authors. The meta-analysis investigated a random sample of Cochrane Reviews published between January 1, 2008 and March 5, 2021. The study involved 35 percent of all Cochrane reviews published during that time frame. The data from these studies were extracted if the intervention was compared to a placebo (or no treatment) and also had an outcome quality-rated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). According to the analysis, most drugs are marketed as safe and effective, but there is no high-quality evidence or solid clinical data to support the claims. Most pharmaceutical interventions did not show statistically-significant positive effects and were not deemed beneficial by the review authors. Only 87 of the interventions (5.6%) provided high-quality evidence to support their use. Even worse, significant harms were measured in 577 or (36.8%) of the interventions studied. A shocking 127 of the interventions caused statistically significant evidence of harm. There were more interventions found to be significantly harmful (8.1%), than there were interventions that had evidence to support their use (5.6%). The meta-analysis warns that “Patients, doctors, and policymakers should consider the lack of high-quality evidence supporting the benefits and harms of many interventions in their decision-making.” The researchers conclude: “Most healthcare interventions studied within recent Cochrane Reviews are not supported by high-quality evidence, and harms are under-reported.” Doctors fighting back against corrupt, totalitarian drug companies As the failures of covid-19 vaccines come to light, more doctors are waking up to the fact that pharmaceutical companies routinely defraud the public and use medical professionals as pawns. In the process, science is manipulated to achieve profit goals, and crimes are covered up. Doctors who treat patients with dignity and warn about the issues with the vaccines are also witnessing sordid corruption coming from their state medical board. The medical boards are currently being used to hunt down doctors who do not promote the predatory narratives crafted by the drug companies. During the covid-19 scandal, medical boards became mafias, protecting a kingpin of pharmaceutical profits and crimes. The medical boards are now threatening many doctors who speak out about the inhumane protocols and the scientific failure/genocide of covid-19 vaccines. The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) are now threatening two of the most important voices in medicine – Drs. Peter McCullough, and Pierre Kory—for allegedly “providing false and inaccurate information to patients.” These doctors have been at the forefront of this crisis, dispelling the fear, treating patients successfully, and warning about the health issues and lethality associated with the covid-19 vaccines. Science and medical fraud have perpetrated mass iatrogenic death in the 21st century The medical malpractice, disability, and wrongful death that has resulted from forced remdesivir, sedation, mechanical ventilation and covid-19 vaccines is just the tip of the iceberg! Scientific and medical fraud is the underlying reason why there have been so many iatrogenic deaths since the year 2000. The number of iatrogenic deaths since January 1, 2000 stands at 17,630,724. In this same time frame, there have been approximately 9,895,605 deaths from hospital errors, 2,383,941 from adverse drug reactions, 2,204,021 from general medical errors, 365,126 from opioids, 1,686,750 from hospital infections, 512,030 from prescription drug-related events and 22,490,054 from chemotherapy. The covid-19 death total represents, to a great extent, systemic errors throughout the medical system. This politicized statistic is fraud in and of itself and is not properly analyzed, detailed, and broken down to provide informed consent and help the public understand the underlying reasons why people died in the medical system. This covid-19 death toll narrative seeks to cover up for mass carnage caused by poisonous drugs like remdesivir, immunosuppressants like chemotherapy, ongoing vaccine damage and antibody dependent enhancement, and the imploding level of medical error that the insurance companies and the courts can no longer keep up with. Keeping this medical error under wraps is the real reason why governments continue to maintain covid-19 pandemic “state of emergency” status. Under this contrived pandemic emergency status, the hospitals and the vaccine makers continue to receive immunity and do not have to answer for their deadly, inhumane, and debilitating protocols. This is also why healthcare workers were chided as “superheroes” throughout the covid-19 scandal. If they go along and do what they are told, they are rewarded. If they don’t, they are shamed, blacklisted, and terminated. The medical system is in shambles, as it bears allegiance to criminal pharmaceutical operations and scientific fraud. The only way forward is for medical professionals to return to medical ethics and human decency, to end liability protections for vaccine makers and hospital systems, and utilize only the interventions that have evidence to support their use.

  • Letter to the Editor: The Truth About Fiat Currency A reader writes to warn people about, what he/she believes is, the imminent removal of fiat currency: “fiat currency is to be removed as a medium of payment in January 2023, at the latest … When fiat currency is removed, all bank accounts will be zeroed … While several countries are doing what is necessary for the people … none of England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland is, as yet, doing so.” To The Exposé, The truth about fiat currency: before it’s too late I feel compelled to make the people aware of who actually owns ALL fiat1 currency, or debt, before it is too late. People hoard a worthless piece of paper in the belief that they own it. They categorically do not. ALL fiat currency is owned by the central bank that printed it. The people have been given use – and only use – but NEVER ownership. What most people don’t realise, is that ALL fiat currency is to be removed as a medium of payment in January 2023, at the latest. This time period was agreed upon by the Bank of International Settlements (“BIS”) and governments so that countries had sufficient time to set up their International Trade Bank and a subsidiary Commercial Bank which would allow people standing in the correct jurisdiction – Land and Soil – to claim the credit that has been deliberately hidden from them. While several countries are doing what is necessary for the people of those countries before the January 2023 deadline, none of England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland is, as yet, doing so. When fiat currency is removed, ALL bank accounts will be zeroed out as a “bail-in.”2 This is actually the banks taking back their property. So, here in England, the people are facing a frightening outlook of having zero means to pay for rent or mortgage, food, utility bills and medical bills in the very near future. The thing that masquerades as an English government has no intention of making the people aware. To do so would leave the UK Corporate government unable to access the credit that belongs to every man, woman and child in this country. There is a false perception that when peoples’ bank accounts are zeroed out the banks will compensate them. This agreement that banks have for a set figure only applies while fiat currency remains in existence. It will not apply after its removal. Those that have savings or hoard debt money under the mattress have two choices: 1. Turn that worthless paper into commodities that shall have value after the financial collapse. 2. Or hold onto it and lose it all with nothing in return. Twice the BIS has attempted to remove the fiat currency before the agreed January 2023 deadline. This action, if it had been successful, would have resulted in approximately 70% of the world’s population dying through starvation. After being hit with huge penalties for any lives lost, the BIS had no choice but to continue with the agreement. These facts are pointed out to make people aware of the gravity they face through ignorance and the suppression of the facts. Fiat currency is debt. A promissory note promising to pay a debt at a later time. A debt cannot be paid with debt. Nobody has ever paid a debt using fiat currency. Nobody. A million of fiat currency in the bank accrues interest on a DAILY basis which is removed from the credit ledger that the banks deliberately hide. While the prospect of having bank accounts zeroed out may be frightening for those with such sums of fiat currency in bank accounts, it is actually a good thing. It is debt, and nothing but debt, that is being removed. Nonetheless, people need to grasp reality before the window of opportunity to prepare for the inevitable collapse closes. Regards, The Antidote is Love Note from The Exposé: 1 Fiat money is a government-issued currency that is not backed by a physical commodity, such as gold or silver, but rather by the government that issued it. Most modern paper currencies are fiat currencies, including the U.S. dollar, the euro, and other major global currencies. 2 A bail-in is the opposite of a bailout. Bailouts help to prevent creditors from taking on losses while bail-ins mandate creditors to take losses. “Technically, deposit holders [“Savers” for example, savings account holders] are the banks’ creditors,” Norbert Häring explained in a 2013 article discussing a planned levy on Cypriot bank savings. Häring suggested that a small change with very wide-reaching effects would be to make deposits on current accounts, as well as securities, remain the customers’ property and cease to function as involuntary loans to the banks. “The payments system would no longer depend on the banks’ solidarity … [Savers] would be unaffected by bank bankruptcies, so that in case of a crisis, the state would no longer be forced to bailout banks just to safeguard the payments system.”

  • Dr. Judy Mikovits: The Plan to Inject Humanity With Cancer Viruses

    “They’ve been doing this for the last 40 years….never take another shot” Important video - Make sure to SHARE it with your Family and Friends

  • The Hard Road to World Order outlining how blockchain will be used for Digital ID technology.

    Former Financial Analyst and Author of Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order outlining how blockchain will be used for Digital ID technology.